Loyalty

Posted: July 9th, 2021 | Author: | Filed under: David Myatt, Drecc, Dreccian, Generation Three, Iteration Three, Monarchism, Mundanes, National Socialism, Next Generation, Nihilism, O9A, O9A Nine Angles, Occultism, Order of Nine Angles, Order of the Nine Angles, Phase Three, Reichsfolk, The Sinister Dialectic, The Sinister Tradition, The Sinisterly Numinous Tradition, Third Iteration, Traditionalism | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Loyalty

.:.There is no such thing as equality in Nature. We can repeat that natural fact all we want, but the average person is ignorant and stupid when it comes to the Nature, Ethos, and Quality of individual people, breeds of people, ethnic folks of people, and races of people. Does everyone have the Same work ethics?

I’m not fucking lazy when I work. Working for Chinese people is hell [my family is mostly ethnic Chinese]. And working for your own family who are Chinese is even harder than hell. 7 days a week. 10-11 hours a day. No breaks, You take a lunch whenever you can squeeze it in. No vacations. No fucking minimum wage: you get whatever is left over after the family shop’s bills are paid, after supplies have been bought, and after your family uses the money to pay the mortgage. I never once complained. Never called in sick. My friends asked me: “Why don’t you quit the family business and get a real job?” Because I’m Loyal: to my family. There is no such thing as equality in Nature. And so we each, as individual people, have our own Degree and Magnitude of work ethics. Therefore, unless you have the same Level of work ethics as I do: we aren’t Peers.

The same with Honour. There is no such thing as equality in Nature. A Traditional Brahminical Southeast Asian family is structured, hierarchal. Your Great Grandmother is the boss and matriarch of the entire family/clan. Under the Great Grandmother is your own grandmother. Under your grandmother is your own mother. In such a Traditional family, your grandmother has more authority than your father [if the father is an outsider]. An “outsider” is a person who marries into your family. Like you have a mother, and your mother has a sister who is your auntie, and that auntie married a man: that man your aunt married is an outsider, and he has no say in how you will be raised and in what culture you will be raised in, because he is not blood, not family. Your mother’s brothers are your Fathers in the family. If your grandmother has a son who is your father, and he married a woman who is your birth mother: she is an outsider, and your father’s sisters are your mothers, not the woman who gave birth to you.

If the Great Grandmother or your grandmother have judged that your birth parents do not have the proper requirements to raise you properly, they can dictate that your parents give you up to one of your aunts or uncles, who becomes your adopted parents. Which was what happened to me and a few of my other cousins. My birth mother had me when she was about 13, and being so young, she didn’t have the proper requirements to raise me right, and raise me inside the Traditional Culture. And so my late Great Grandmother, her daughter [my grand auntie], and my grandmother decided to give me to my birth mother’s eldest sister, who has raised me since I was born. I call my birth mother “little [underling/inferior] mom” and my auntie who is my adopted mother “big [superior] mom.” But why does everybody in the family put up with such rules, hierarchy, to the point where your elders can take your children away from you? Why not run away or move away? Why follow such rules and structure? Because of Loyalty and Honour. And so, not everybody has the same level of Honour. If you barely get along with your parents and siblings: you don’t have the same kind and level of Honour as I do, and so we aren’t Peers, we aren’t Equals.

The same with Loyalty. There is no such thing as equality in Nature. And so, not everybody has the same sense, kind, and level of Loyalty. Like Honour and Work Ethics: Loyalty is observable in your human behavour and way of life. Different individuals have different degrees and magnitudes of Loyalty. If your were in a street gang, and your gang leader told you to pull the trigger and kill someone: would you do it? If you were a soldier and your commander told you to kill an enemy soldier: would you do it? If you were a Muslim, and your religion told you to kill an infidel: would you do it?

Loyalty in Buddhism is a Dhamma. Dhamma [Pali] means Phenomenon. Like Nature has natural phenomena which can be observed. And the insights we get from such observation tells us about the Nature and Ethos of Nature. The same with Loyalty as a Dhamma. As a Dhamma, shit like Loyalty and Honour is observable in how you are being human. And the insights we get from observing such things tell us about your Nature and Ethos as a Breed of person.

There are certain breeds of human who lack any sense of Loyalty, and you can see it: they jump around from religion to religion, from god to god, from holy book to holy book. Never Loyal to any single religion, any single god, any single holy book. They discard their own ethnic culture and traditions. They cheat on their wives and husbands, on their boyfriends and girlfriends, lacking Loyalty/Commitment. They lack any real Loyalty to friends, their blood relations, their associates, their folk, their Culture, their Traditions, their Race.

Loyalty is hard. Because human nature and human behaviour and human relationships aren’t easy and smooth. You get into fights and arguments. And if the Bond of Loyalty is strong: after such fights, you revert back to being Loyal associates, Loyal Blood. Living in a big family, or living with friends, makes it so that sometimes you get on each other’s nerves. But we’re stuck with each other, through thick and thin, for better or for worse. The internet is interesting because it makes the world a small place, and you see or interact with the same people year after year. You get on each other’s nerves, get into arguments, but the Bonds of Loyalty never break for those of us with High Quality and High Level of Loyalty.

Loyalty is also hard because there is no such thing as equality in Nature: which also means that your friends and family members are not like you. My own sister is a Liberal and a Leftist and she strongly supports Critical Race Theory and believes that White people are inherently racist. My boy cousins [who are mostly Chinese in ethnicity] wants China to be the world superpower. I have a few Five Percenter Black Friends who are into the Black Power Movement. And so, in such cases, Loyalty trumps such differences. Loyalty in such cases is when you set such differences aside, and make it a rule to never talk about religion or politics with each other: because such topics are divisive. And you love each other, care for one another, despite such differences.

In the ancient world, the ancient Aryan ethnicities in the Aryavarta, understood this concept of Natural Inequality, that Uniqueness exists in nature and Humanity, and that human breeds and human individuals have unequal capacity for Intelligence, Philosophical understanding, Sagely Wisdom, Honour, Loyalty, Ethics, Strengths, Bravery, Craftiness, and so on. And so, in such ancient times, they structured their social order into a hierarchy. At the top were the humans with the most excellent Nature and Ethos of Sages. Below the Sages were the natural aristocracy who had high capacity for Honour and Loyalty. Below the aristocracy were the soldiers/warriors who were naturally brave and death defiant. Below the warriors were the clever and crafty merchants and tradesmen. And below them were the Common, the Mundane, the Average, the Anarya [Unaryan], who are a savage and ignorant breed of humans who lack high mental capacity, lack intelligence, lacked Honour, lacked Loyalty.

Today, such concept of hierarchy based on your level of intelligence, sagely wisdom, bravery, Honour, and Loyalty is alien to the typical Westerner. And so we vote and elect basal breeds of humans: Commoners, Mundanes, Anarya, into political offices of power, based on the promises they make and opinions they have… and our elected officials become corrupt, make themselves rich, and do as little as possible to make the machinery of the Nation work. It’s not such elected officials fault: it’s your fault because you voted them into power and you are the Anarya. This is what happens when you give the Common, unthinking mob of Underlings the power to make political, social, martial [war shit], economic, and religious decisions/matters. It’s lunacy.

Loyalty is the Defining Quality and Characteristic of an ONA initiate/associate. Did you know that? We forget sometimes don’t we:

The O9A Code of Kindred Honour

Those who are not our kindred brothers or sisters are mundanes. Those who are our brothers and sisters live by – and are prepared to die by – our unique code of honour.

Our Kindred-Honour means we are fiercely loyal to only our own ONA kind. Our Kindred-Honour means we are wary of, and do not trust – and often despise – all those who are not like us, especially mundanes.

Our duty – as individuals who live by the Code of Kindred-Honour – is to be ready, willing, and able to defend ourselves, in any situation, and to be prepared to use lethal force to so defend ourselves.

Our duty – as individuals who live by the Code of Kindred-Honour – is to be loyal to, and to defend, our own kind: to do our duty, even unto death, to those of our brothers and sisters to whom we have sworn a personal oath of loyalty.

Our obligation – as individuals who live by the Code of Kindred-Honour – is to seek revenge, if necessary unto death, against anyone who acts dishonourably toward us, or who acts dishonourably toward those to whom we have sworn a personal oath of loyalty.

Our obligation – as individuals who live by the Code of Kindred-Honour – is to never willingly submit to any mundane; to die fighting rather than surrender to them; to die rather (if necessary by our own hand) than allow ourselves to be dishonourably humiliated by them.

Our obligation – as individuals who live by the Code of Kindred-Honour – is to never trust any oath or any pledge of loyalty given, or any promise made, by any mundane, and to be wary and suspicious of them at all times.

Our duty – as individuals who live by the Code of Kindred-Honour – is to settle our serious disputes, among ourselves, by either trial by combat, or by a duel involving deadly weapons; and to challenge to a duel anyone – mundane, or one of our own kind – who impugns our kindred honour or who makes mundane accusations against us.

Our duty – as individuals who live by the Code of Kindred-Honour – is to settle our non-serious disputes, among ourselves, by having a man or woman from among us (a brother or sister who is highly esteemed because of their honourable deeds), arbitrate and decide the matter for us, and to accept without question, and to abide by, their decision, because of the respect we have accorded them as arbitrator

Our duty – as kindred individuals who live by the Code of Kindred-Honour – is to always keep our word to our own kind, once we have given our word on our kindred honour, for to break one’s word among our own kind is a cowardly, a mundane, act.

Our duty – as individuals who live by the Code of Kindred-Honour – is to act with kindred honour in all our dealings with our own kindred kind.

Our obligation – as individuals who live by the Code of Kindred-Honour – is to marry only those from our own kind, who thus, like us, live by our Code and are prepared to die to save their Kindred-Honour and that of their brothers and sisters.

Our duty – as individuals who live by the Code of Kindred-Honour – means that an oath of kindred loyalty or allegiance, once sworn by a man or woman of kindred honour (“I swear on my Kindred-Honour that I shall…”) can only be ended either: (1) by the man or woman of kindred honour formally asking the person to whom the oath was sworn to release them from that oath, and that person agreeing so to release them; or (2) by the death of the person to whom the oath was sworn. Anything else is unworthy of us, and the act of a mundane.

Many are called to ONA. The Mythos of ONA attracts a lot of people. It’s easy to get into ONA. There is no membership. You read the ONA Corpus, put the shit into practice in whole or in part. But Time is your Tester. Because in Time, as Time passes: the Breed of Human that you are becomes visible and observable. And if you are the Common Breed of Anarya: your lack of Loyalty will cause you to leave ONA, to find something new, and better. Like how your kind and breed play musical chairs with your gods, religions, culture, and shit: moving around, jumping around. Many are called, but few Chosen.


–David Myatt

 

/Chloe


Spaewife

Posted: July 7th, 2021 | Author: | Filed under: Acausal Theory, Alchemy, Anarchy, David Myatt, Deofel Quartet, Drecc, Dreccian, Druidry, Labyrinthos Mythologicus, Nihilism, O9A, O9A Nine Angles, Occultism, Order of Nine Angles, Order of the Nine Angles, paganism, Psychic Readings, Rounwytha, The Sinister Dialectic, The Sinister Game, The Sinister Tradition, The Sinisterly Numinous Tradition | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Spaewife


–ONA’s Black Book of Satan 1

 

.:.I started writing about Witchcraft in Nexion Zine 5.1 HERE. And then the entire issue of 7.1 [1800 pages] is about Magick, Sorcery, Animism, Paganism, and Witchcraft. I write so much, I forget where everything is. I was curious a few days ago about how many pages I’ve actually written. So I added up every page of each issue of Nexion Zine, plus Sinister Musings [which is 90% of my defunct onanxs.wordpress.com blog], plus Opus Vrilis, minus 100 pages [re-used ONA MSS], and I found out – to my surprise – that I’ve written approximately 6000 pages since 2006-2007; non-stop. You really do become the people you admire and look up to. There have been two constant people I have looked up to and secretly strive to be like for the past 10-13 years. The first is David Myatt. The second is Prozak [also known as Brett of Amerika.org]. Both of them write non-stop, year after year. And both of them, via their writings, have inspired and influenced people.

How do you know if your writings are worth anything, are of any value or import? By the writings’ content? By the writings’ erudition? By how many facts the writings contain? No. The Buddha tells us that you judge a Thing by its Vipaka [Fruit]; by the Fruit that it generates. Or as Jesus said: “By their Fruits…” The act of writing is the Kamma [karma], which literally means Work/Labor/Build. And you judge the work, labor, by the Fruit such work bears. You see? I can’t say too much about this subject, but to drop a hint about the Fruit I’m talking about: David Myatt, over the past 40-50 years, via his writings, under various pen-names, has inspired and influenced many people to become radicalized, extremists, who eventually… “Presences the Dark,” shall we say. Writing is an artform, or as ONA’s 21 Satanic Points say: “10. Forge not works of art but swords of death, for therein lies great art.” But anyways.

 

 

I didn’t always believe in psychics and psychic readings and seeing the future. But I was fortunate to have a few friends who were very good professional card readers, and some of the old people in my family and extended family can read cards. I have an aunt whose Vietnamese husband’s [my uncle] father was into magick and psychic stuff. My uncle tells me that before his father died, he burned all of his books and scrolls on magick and psychic stuff and forbade his children from learning it. The uncle’s father knew the exact day he was going to die. The uncle’s father left a note under his pillow, which had the date and time of his death. In our culture [Brahminical Southeast Asian], you need a Kru [guru], in order to have the supernatural ability to be very accurate with seeing the future. A Kru is a spirit who teaches and tells you shit.

And so, I got curious about psychic card readings. So, I spent the past 13 years buying [gradually] about $1000 worth of different psychic cards. Most of them were various kinds of tarot cards. Some were tea leaf reading cards, Lenormand, and so on. I try to use each deck to read with, and I test each deck. If the deck of cards fails the tests, I discard them and give them away.

The way I test my cards is I’ll ask them a number of questions for a couple weeks. I usually ask these questions: (A) What did I do yesterday? (B) What will I be doing today before I go to bed? (C) What am I going to do in 2 hours? (D) What will I experience tomorrow?

Those are my questions. I give each deck of cards only 2 weeks to prove themselves to me, or I discard them and never use them again. They must answer each question without being vague, without me needing to interpret shit. Just give me a normal, relevant, straightforward answer to the god damn question.

All of my psychic cards have failed me. They produce gibberish as answers. All except one: the Drecc Deck. And so, after a decade of buying hundreds of decks, and testing every deck, I only use one deck of cards now. The Drecc Deck, for some reason, has the ability to answer my test questions. The Drecc Deck is a form of Logomancy, which basically means that your answer is written out for you to read. Logomancy is one of the oldest forms of divination in China and the ancient world.

I use my personal Drecc Deck on an everyday basis. I carry them with me wherever I go. And so, after using them every day for years, I’ve learned to work with them. All I need are 3 cards. The words on the 3 cards then give me words and impressions and feelings. The words triggers your faculty of Empathy, and you empath your answer. The Logomancy of the Drecc Deck has an accuracy rate of 80-90%, and 90% of the time, the worded answers that it gives you is actually relevant to the question you asked.

So, my entire family now comes to me when they have a question, so I can divine an answer for them. All I need is 3 cards. One of my aunts regularly calls me, every other day, to ask me questions. This aunt invests in and trades trades stocks. She recently called me up to ask me and my Drecc Deck questions on 3 stocks she wanted to trade. The Drecc Deck told her that the first two she named were duds and that she should avoid them. So my aunt says: “What about an airline stock? I found an airline stock I like.” So I threw down three cards. They were positive cards. One card said that there is an increase and gradual growth. Another card said the word “government.” I asked my aunt what this airline stock has to do with a government. And my aunt says to me: “Oh yeah, the airline is partly owned by the Thai government.”

My other aunt asked my cards if she will be moving to Oregon, because she came down for a visit and loved the place. This auntie likes nature too. I threw down three Drecc Deck cards, and saw the logomantic message. The cards said that this auntie desires to move, but she can’t because her heart is tied to her son [my cousin], and her son does not want to move to rural Oregon. My auntie was amazed and admited that deep in her heart, she can’t leave her son behind.

My grandmother recently ask me to give her a reading. She wanted to know if any of my aunts and uncles will also move away from her to live in Oregon. The Cards said that one of her three sons, a slender one, will eventually relocate to Oregon. She knew which of my uncles the Drecc Dreck was referring to. She then asked me: “Can you see when I will die?” I threw down three cards. The cards said that it will be a while, and that she has nothing to worry about because two women [two of my aunts] will take care of her all her life, until she passes on. She was happy with the answer.

Besides the Drecc Deck, I also use the nkobos [seashells] and chamalongos [coconut shells] as divination instruments. A spirit that lives in my Fetish speaks through the shells. Those are just as accurate as the Drecc Deck.

I love divination. I used to be skeptical, but after experiencing it first-hand and directly, I know that it works… you just need the right species and tools of divination.

To supplement the Drecc Deck, nkobos, and chamalongos, I taught myself Qi Men Dun Jia:

Right now I am starting to teach myself Jyotish [Vedic Astrology/Horary] and Traditional Western Horary Astrology.

I bought a $300 Jyotisha software to work with:

The software is called Parashara’s Light version 9.

I also bought a $300 Western Horary program, called Solar Fire version 9:

So, when I’m not traveling or writing, I’m studying Vedic Jyotish, and Traditional Western Horary Astrology. Each has thousands of pages to study, and hundreds of charts to study.

What got me into Qi Men Dun Jia [Chinese Horary], Jyotisha, and Western Horary was reading about how they have been used to solve crimes! I love mysteries and crime solving. I suck so bad at the moment. But I can cast a Traditional Western Horary chart for a question and derive a Yes/No answer.

The Big Mystery is why divination works. To begin to learn that Big Mystery, you first have to study this book:

 

The book is called “The Elizabethan World Picture.” The term “world picture,” believe it or not, was the olden English term for what we today call a “World-View” or “World-Model.” Literally a “Picture” of how the World is and works. The natural philosophers and theological philosophers at that time understood a whole lot, and had it right; although they had “primitive” symbolical language to express what they understood.

So there is more – much more – to being o9a than being politically oriented. The ONA is essentially a Pagan Tradition. The problem is, in pop-culture occultism and also in academia, nobody knows or understands what the nebulous word “pagan” means. You can’t be something you don’t understand. I try to explain what “pagan” and “paganism” means in Nexion Zine 5.1, 6.1, and 7.1. My explanations are expansions of David Myatt’s simple, yet very accurate explanation. To paraphrase what DM said: Paganism is the -ism of the Paganus.

Ever since I got into ONA, I’ve been studying and striving to be a Spaewife [spae wife]. To be able to use divination to foresee the most probably future. To learn to know and dis-cover the magical and medicinal properties of plants by directly communing with the plants. To learn how to read the Great Book of Nature and understand Her doctrines/dharmas/principles. To learn to understand what the supernatural is and how to use it.

In o9a, there are things we write which are meant for Public Consumption [for the sake of the Mythos of ONA and the sake of the Labyrinthos Mythologicus], such as the political stuff you see here. And there are things that should remain a private aural tradition among us, taught from Mouth to Ear, person to person [initiate to initiate]; such as the Pagan Tradition, the aural wisdom of a Spaeman and Spaewife.

/Chloe

 

 

 

 


Race War’s Abrewing

Posted: July 5th, 2021 | Author: | Filed under: Anarcho-Nihilism, Anarchy, Civil War, Far-Right, Islam, Journalism, Junk Journalism, Leftists, Liberals, Mundanes, National Socialism, neo-marxism, News, Nihilism, O9A, O9A Nine Angles, Occultism, Order of Nine Angles, Order of the Nine Angles, racial equity, Reichsfolk, Satanic Polemics, The Sinister Dialectic, The Sinister Game | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Race War’s Abrewing

.:.So when you allow BLM negros to burn streets, cities, and police stations down, and rather than incriminate such BLM negros, you support and praise them, such negros will begin to feel empowered, knowing they can get away with anything and not get busted. Thus, such negros will become even more radical, because they know they can’t and won’t get into any trouble:

Of course, because Leftists are in power, a group of militant Black radicals, armed with rifles, chanting “Black Power,” aren’t considered racists or domestic terrorists. And of course, because Leftists are in power, a group of White people, armed with rifles, walking down streets screaming “White Power,” would be criminals, racists, and domestic terrorists, who would all quickly be jailed for federal offenses.

The Reality [re: Realism] of things is that we are Primates, that as Primates we are social/troop creatures who form primate groups [families, clans, communities, gangs, political parties, etc], and as primates: we are territorial. What’s that mean in simple English? It means that when you have different breeds of human primates occupying the same territory: you will have 1) Competition, 2) Rivalry, & 3) Fights to gain Control of the said territory.

And so, it makes sense, that during this period of America, when Blacks 1) know that their numbers are growing into the New Majority & 2) knowing that the Leftist Regime supports them, that these Blacks will militarize and desire to use force and violence against Whites to take control of as much of American society as possible. It’s just the Law of Nature. Diversity and Equality by Natural Law cannot co-exist together, or territorial conflict is inevitable. If you want Diversity, you cannot have equality [see the Vedic Aryan caste system]. If you want equality, you cannot have Diversity [see homogenous nations/cultures like Japan].

White people here in America have made a grave mistake, and their children and grand children will pay for their mistake. This is what happens when you are an idealist and you try to impose ideals and ideology [racial diversity + egalitarianism] on top of Natural Laws/Principles. Ideology – meaning our human invented abstract beliefs – can never displace or replace the Laws of Nature. There will be ethnic conflict/struggle for territory and power here in America. It’s how Mother Nature works/functions. As time passes, you will see more and more radical Black groups:

Human behavior is based on human nature, which in general is predictable. It’s predictable because human nature is instinctive, and human instinct is “reactive” or “reactionary,” meaning that we humans, and all biological organisms, React to Stimuli. In other words: the Stimulus influences the Reaction: fire to skin = react by pulling away from fire; see food = react by eating; long day at work = react by resting idly when home; thirsty = react by looking for water to drink; need money to pay bills = react by searching for work.

And so, unbeknownst to Leftist Journalist Clowns [like Hate Not Hope], when we see Whites become radical or extremist Nazis, that outer expression of them being Nazis is a symptom of a cause: a reaction to environmental stimuli. As a Buddhist, when we see a White person radicalize, we ask: Why? What is the Cause? There weren’t this many Neo-Nazi and Far-Rightists groups 10 years ago in Europe and the UK. I remember. So what happened in those 10 years? A number of things happened, but one big thing that happened was Angela Merkel and her lunatic Leftist-Liberal immigration policies. That’s the Stimulus. All people are born good and nice. Like all puppies are born good and nice. But when you back a nice dog into a corner, and it feels threatened, it will bark, behave aggressively, and try to fight back.

And so the same with humans. When you push White people into a corner with stupid open boarder immigration policies, and millions of Africans and Muslims invade and colonize Europe which then threatens native European cultures and social order: some Whites will react to that stimuli by becoming aggressive, radical, extremists, Neo-Nazis. And so, putting such far-right Whites into prisons only covers the symptoms: it does not get rid of the Cause. You can throw far-right White people in jail all you want: but as long as the cause is still present, that cause will continue to generate more far-right Whites. The Cause of the symptom is the Left and their policies/agendas. Get rid of the Cause and you get rid of the symptom.

The reason/cause for why Blacks are radicalizing into militant Black Nationalist movements is different. They are radicalizing because their stimuli is emboldenment brought by a Leftist Regime and their progressive/liberal agendas. Shit like this:

It is a Federal Offense to behave with these Blacks in the wrong, unsanctioned way now. They can play muck games with you, get you irrational and angry, you do or say something in that irrational state, and BAM: Federal Hate Crime [fake crime]. Shit like that, along with their ability to burn cities down and loot sans punishment, embolden them.

That plus how Nature works. In the biological animal world [we humans are animals] when two rival groups are fighting each other for territory and resource, before and during the fight, the two groups size each other up. That’s when you observe your rival and determine if you can fuck them up or not. Fight or Flight. And so, on a collective level, Black people are sizing up Whites. What do you think White people look like in the eyes of a Black man? You have to try to see this in an objective manner. The Media gives you clues.

In Black oriented media, such as music and its derived Hip Hop culture, Black men are tough, gansta, fuck bitches left and right, risk takers, violent, etc. And how does Leftist media condition White people to be? Like this:

It’s some fucking White guy who thinks he’s a girl and Korean. He got surgery to look Korean, and says he [or she, whatever] is “transracial.” Haven’t you realized that today there are a whole lot of fags and trannies? It wasn’t this bad 10 years ago. Now, they are everywhere. Even grade school kids are gay and transexual. It’s almost as if the Leftist Media is trying to make White people as gay and emasculated as possible. I’m not White, and I honestly feel embarrassed on your guys’ behalf. Don’t know guys understand that the Left is doing something to your race and people?

It’s as if, in the minds of the Leftists-Progressives, the only good White person is a fag. White faggots are the Darling Poster Child of the Left, because as a White faggot you aren’t racist, you can’t radicalize because you’re a fucking sissy, you’d rather wear a dress than buy guns, and you are a True Believer in the doctrine of Diversity. You are harmless, passive, docile: you’ve been emasculated. And if you act tough: they call you a White Supremacist.

White fags would rather put in the effort of fighting to be able to urinate in the girls bathroom, and compete in sports with girls, then buy guns and become violent. What else are White faggots good for? They think girls are gross and don’t make new/more White people. Do you see the difference? Black media conditions Black men to be macho, gansta, and sexually promiscuous, while Leftist Media conditions White males/boys/guys to be fags and trannies. So how do you think White people look in the eyes of a Black man, a militant, Black nationalist man? Like emasculated men.

Add to that the fact that the Leftist Regime in America and Capitalist Corporations no longer support White people [who are portrayed to be all inherently racists]: and you have an emboldened race of Black people. Bold enough to now become armed radical Black nationalists. Of course: you won’t see any of those Leftist Journalist websites bring up Black Power and Radial Black Nationalists. Just like they don’t deem the riots, arson, and looting by BLM to be radical, violent, extreme, racist, or domestic terrorism/mayhem, or even criminal. What do you think America will look like 20 years from now, if Whites continue to be emasculated, and Blacks continue to increase in population size and power?

/Chloe


Ambitious China

Posted: June 28th, 2021 | Author: | Filed under: Alchemy, Anarcho-Nihilism, Anarchy, Far-Right, Leftists, Liberals, neo-marxism, Nihilism, O9A, O9A Nine Angles, Occultism, Order of Nine Angles, Order of the Nine Angles, The Sinister Game, World War Three | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Ambitious China

.:.While we’re over here in America playing Patty-Cake with Black people, and while the Leftists aimlessly wander about politically: China has Direction; a Destiny, a Destination it wants or needs to go towards. China wants to dominate the world in 20 years.

20 years is a bad number for the West. In 20 years, if things don’t change in America, White people will be a minority race. That in turn means that the New Majority – Blacks and Browns – will be voting Left. Things will be like California, which is virtually a one party State [ruled by democrats/Leftists]. And the Left are neo-marxists: butt-buddies with China [Chinese money].

I’m a Unilateralist. America should be the world’s only Superpower. There is no room at the Apex of the World Order for China. What the West – America and Europe – need to do is get these fucking Leftist faggots out of power, and put in a President and Prime Ministers, who have the balls to pre-emptively engage in war with China, before those 20 years. Or the West is FUCKED.

I’m not the only one who knows that World War Three is inevitable. We just need another Pearl Harbor: Taiwan. China just needs to make their fateful/wyrdful move: invade Taiwan. At the end of the day, whether we are politicians or citizens, we are all governed by primal Human Nature, and Greed is an aspect of that Human Nature.

That Greed forces China to not be happy with what it has: it just needs Taiwan. That Greed will push the West to war with China, because we aren’t happy with what we have: we need to maintain global hegemony. Beyond that primal Human Nature: everything else is rationalization and a game of charades. The game of charades is to influence and manipulate mass public opinion.

/Chloe


Caste & Hegemony

Posted: May 27th, 2021 | Author: | Filed under: Acausal Theory, Alchemy, Anarcho-Nihilism, Anarchy, Far-Right, Heretical Texts, Islam, Leftists, Liberals, Monarchism, National Socialism, neo-marxism, O9A, O9A Nine Angles, Occultism, Order of Nine Angles, Order of the Nine Angles, Reichsfolk, Satanic Heresy, Satanic Polemics, The Sinister Dialectic, The Sinister Game, The Sinister Tradition, The Sinisterly Numinous Tradition | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Caste & Hegemony

.:.Brahmanism was brought to the Indochinese Peninsula many hundreds of years ago when the Kamboja-Aryans migrated there, by way of following the Mekong River from Kashmir [Northern Hindustan]; even before Buddhism took root in that peninsula. And so, although Southeast Asian culture/society is today Theravada Buddhist, much of our culture/society retains a lot of Brahmanism. One of the Brahmanist things we still retain is the caste system, although in our culture/society it’s not as religious and rigid as how the Hindus do thing.

The word “Brahmanism” by the way does not mean the wordship or religion of Brahma. In Khmer, the term makes more sense and is more descriptive, we call Brahmanism in Khmer as: “Priamagne Sasana.” I’ve phonetically spelled the word “Priamagne” according to the French, which is easier for me. And so the consonantal cluster of “GN” in Priamagne is pronounced as the “GN” in Filet Mignon; and the final “E” in Priamagne is silent.

Priamagne is our word for The Brahman/Brahmins, who are the Priestly Sages who occupy the very tippy top of the Caste Hierarchy. Priamagne is the Collective Singular word for them – The Brahman – much like saying “The Khmer,” “The Irish,” “The French,” “The English,” “The Viet Cong,” and so on. “A Brahmin” [the individual singular] is “Priam” which is pronounced in English phonetics as “Pree-yum” [the terminal -iam sounding exactly like the -iam in the name William].

The word “Sasana” means: 1) Culture, 2) Practice, 3) Observance, 4) Ordinance, 5) Custom, 6) Way/Procedure, 6) Precedent, 7) Tradition, & 8) Religion. Sasana doesn’t only mean the reductive “religion.” For example: when I cut the skin off my apples, I use a knife, and I face the blade towards my body, and I cut the skin in that Way, according to that Procedure and Custom. And so my grandmother will laugh and say in Khmer: “You cut your apples according to the Sasana of the Americans.” The Khmer, according to how they do things, hold the knife with the blade facing away from their body, and they strip the peel piece by piece and somehow don’t cut their fingers.

And so Priamagne Sasana means something like: The Traditions, Culture, and Religious Practices and Ordinances of the Brahmin Sages, as such are expounded by them according to the Vedas, and by oral tradition/transmission. Therefore, what we today know as “Hinduism,” is a subset or branch of Brahmanism which is culturally specific to the People of the Indus/Hindus River. And so, what Hindus practice and observe in India may and will differ from how Brahmanism is practiced in places like Indochina and Bali. A simple example: Hindus usually do not eat cow meat, because they believe cows are holy, whereas some Brahmanists eat beef and raise cattle for meat. Although my grandmother abstains from eating beef. Another example of difference is that in India and to Hindus the Vedas are of Primal/Principle sectarian regard/importance, whereas in the Brahmanism of Indochina and Bali, the Mahabharata [the Holy Bhagavad Gita is a section of the Mahabharat Epic] and Ramayana are more culturally important. Another difference is that in Indochina, specifically amongst the Thai, Khmer, and Lao, our Brahmanism has been syncretized with Theravada Buddhism for hundreds of years, such that the Brahmanism is the Culture and the Buddhism is the religion. The Buddha is considered to be an avatar of Vishnu. Thus, Angkor Wat is both an ancient Temple for Vishnu as well as a Buddhist Temple.

Regarding Castes

Since very ancient times, the Brahman have expounded as a part of their cultural traditions [sasana] the caste system. Caste in Sanskrit is “Varna.”

So now, “varna” reductively means “Color,” as in the color of your skin. Varna doesn’t mean “rank” or “level.” The Sanskrit word “Varna” over the centuries has lost most of its original meanings. Thus, to better understand what that word meant in ancient times, we must go and see what the Pali [Pali is to Italian what Sanskrit is to Latin] word means. Pali being the dead language used as a sacerdotal and liturgical language of Theravada Buddhism means that its words are very conservative [the meanings don’t change, because it’s a dead language, and because such meanings are literally religiously kept as is]. In Pali and Theravada Buddhism Varna is “Vanna”:

If Dharma then Vanna. Dharma is to Dharmakaya what Vanna is to Manussa [human beings]. Dharma is the Way/Tao/Ethos/Laws/Principles of Nature, and Dharmakaya literally means “Body of Nature.” The Laws or Ways of Nature can be Observed in the Body of Nature, because such Observations are the Appearance and Expression of the Body of Nature.

And so we Observe that clouds rain and the rain water feeds and nourishes forests. And so the action/behavior/activity of the Body of Nature raining, and watering forests is an Expression and an observable Appearance of the Body of Nature. Thus, in Pali, the word Dharma is Dhamma, which also means Phenomenon. A Phenomenon is an observable action, behavior, activity, expression, constitution of the Body of Nature [Dhammakaya in Pali].

Thus, the word Vanna means the following: Look, Appearance, Color [red = ripe, green = unripe, white clouds = no rain, black clouds = rain, etc], Beauty, Constitution, Complexion of your skin, and Expression.

Your Vanna is your Constitutional Make-up as a human being, according to your Dharma: your wyrd, your natural inclinations, your natural proclivities, your nature, your physis, your ethos, your natural disposition; the abilities, capabilities, and capacities which Nature has given to you as a human being. And because your Vanna is born from your Dharma: your Vanna is an observable phenomenon of your Human Character/Quality.

If by natural disposition you are kind, respectful, and gentlemanly: that is your Vanna. If the type and quality of person you are is distrusting, spiteful, and hateful: that is your Vanna. If by natural proclivity and natural passion you like music, and you dedicate years and years to become a Musician: that is your Vanna; you are an Artisan. If by natural abilities you become a self-made millionaire Vanna; you are a successful tradesman/merchant. If by natural proclivity and capacity of mind you are a philosopher like Plato or Lao Tzu or whoever: that is your Vanna; you are a Brahmin. If by natural disposition you like weapons and fighting, and you are naturally brave and death defiant: that is your Vanna; you are according to your nature and ethos [your Dharma] a Warrior. Therefore, there are Peers of a certain Vanna, a peerage of people sharing the same Vanna.

And according to your Vanna, your natural character and quality [your Dharma] you should be trained accordingly in order to draw out the best of your skills and the best of your specific Breed of Humanity, in order to make you fully human, to fully bring out the gifts and skills that Brahma and the Gods have given to you: in order that you and your skills and abilities will help your Society Function Properly, in a healthy manner such that all members of your society derives proper welfare and well-being.

And so, when you as a human being develop your Dharma, to express your Vanna,  you become a Functioning Person. Like a Part of a Car properly functions in order for the whole car to work. And so, units of a System must function according to their Dharma, in order that the system itself as a Cybernetic Whole functions properly. When you do not function [are dysfunctional] as a unit of a society/system, we say that you are “Broken,” like a machine is broken when it doesn’t work:

For more details as to why Sanskrit and ancient Hebrew share words and roots in common, see the following essays in Nexion Zine: Note On The Paragon Self-Initiation Ritual & The Etymology & Secrets Of Cain.

An example of a Broken Human in our contemporary Western society would be the bums who live and sleep on the streets because they are addicted to alcohol or drugs. That is their Vanna as a human being: the type or kind or Breed [other meanings of Vanna] of human they are. And by Dharma: there is nothing inherently wrong or evil with such bums. It’s how Nature/God made them: to be dysfunctional and broken. It is their Dharma, their Vanna. And such bums, according to their Dharma and broken condition, have very few abilities as a means of sustenance and to support their addictions and mode of life. They can dumpster-dive to collect tin cans and plastics to recycle, they can clean the streets and toilets and do other such lowly jobs/chores for money.

And so, in accord with their Vanna, such Broken bums by dharma, collect cans, recycle, clean streets and toilets, and so on. Such would be their “Caste Duties/Jobs.” And so, out of Compassion, we establish a social contract [rules of society] where we say: “Because these bums chose to be such kind/breed of humans, to live on the street, and refuse to work normal jobs, no body who is not a bum may or should collect cans, rummage through dumpsters, and recycle stuff for money, because those jobs are reserved for those bums, because that’s all they can and are willing to do. They need a means to make money somehow to feed themselves and to afford basic creature comforts.”

It’s not that we as a society hate those bums. It is out of compassion, and out of an understanding such bums are the way they are because of how God has made them that we allow them their specific Caste Duties/Jobs. And so, as a compassionate society, we allow them to express their Vanna, their Dharma, to work their Caste Duties [collect cans, rummage through trash bins, recycle shit] as ways to help them make money to buy food, we try to help them have and find shelters, help them have access to medical facilities. But bums, by nature and ethos don’t have the Vanna or Dharma to be death defiant soldiers, or billionaire merchants, or political leaders, or scientists/philosophers, and so we can’t make them into such. Unless they have it in their Nature/Ethos/Dharma to change themselves and become a soldier, a self-made millionaire, a political leader, a philosopher. If they can and have changed themselves, then a Process of Acceptance & Admission into the Peerage of their Vanna takes place:

In the same way of compassion and system/cybernetic awareness, if there were a group of Mexicans who spoke no English and had no skills, but they are good [having the natural proclivity] at making tacos and burritos, then out of compassion, we establish a social contract [rules of society] where we say: “These Mexicans, being more developed as a breed of human than bums, who have the natural skill of making foodstuff in the form of tacos and burritos, no body who is not a Mexican unable to speak English and without possession of other skills, may or should make tacos and burritos to sell for profit, because this specific breed of Mexicans need a means to earn an income to buy food and afford basic creature comforts. Therefore let such breed of Mexicans have the exclusive right to make such tacos and burritos for profit, until such time when they or their descendants have gained other skills useful to society, where then they will be allotted and trained in other duties in accordance with their skills and Vanna.”

Each Vanna behaves like a Guild or a Trade Union composed of Peers, who are of the same Breed, and who possess the same Dharma. In order to officially belong to one of the upper three Vannas – that of the Brahmins, the Kshatrya, and the Vaishya – you first must have the Dharma appropriate of such a Vanna, you secondly must be accepted as an equal/peer of people inhabiting such Vanna, and upon your acceptance as an equal/peer, you underwent a private/secret initiation ceremony, where your peers initiates you into their Vanna. Thus, you were called “Twice Born.” You are Born once as a Generic/Common Human Being, and according to your Breed, Kind, Disposition, Nature, Ethos, Ability, Capacity, Character, Quality: you are Born again among Equals and Peers of your own Breed and Kind: your own Vanna. Birds of a feather flock together, and so on. Your Vanna Peerage then gives you access to the proper society, life style, environment that trains you better as the Vanna you belong to, gives you the privileges and advantages of that Vanna, and so on.

It’s like the son or daughter of a successful musician is born around their father’s Peer musicians, producers, and so on, and so such sons and daughters have access to an environment that can train and make them into musicians. It is like being close friends with or children of a self-made multimillionaire businessman: you have access to a social order, a subculture, an environment which can and will help you express your Dharma and Vanna as a self-made millionaire businessperson. A very wealthy man once said: “I can tell what kind of person you will be by the people you associate with.”

Thus, if you belonged to the Kshatrya caste, and were accepted as an aristocrat by other Breeds of human who are themselves aristocratic in dharma/nature/ethos, then after your Second Birth into that subcaste of Aristocrats, you underwent proper training according to long establish Vanna/Cultural institutions, which would train you to become a statesman, an advisor of kings and generals, etc, according to your dharma.

Also then, before the One who will be King can assume the role and power of a king, that One must first undergo proper training by long established Vanna/Cultural institutions, in order to make you into an intelligent, noble, honorable, and properly functioning monarch. In ancient times, if you were the One who will be king, your educators were the Brahman: the Sages, Academics, Philosophers, Priests, Monks, Nuns, Scientists [social, political, economic, etc]. Your Family [the fruit never falls far from the tree], the level [state of development] of your Noble and Honorable nature, and your Quality and Aptitude and Dharma and then years of training, are what Qualifies you to be a monarch. Not doctrines, or political ideology, or “party” affiliation, or promises you make, or your popularity, or votes casted by the common public who know and understand nothing about Noble and Honorable conduct/virtue, statesmanship; social, political, and economic science, etc. Does it ultimately make any sense to you that a common people, who are in total ignorance of the understanding of human nature, how society works and functions, how civilization works and functions, should have the power to elect a person to run/rule a civilization?

And so, in very ancient days, the word “Arya” [aryan] strictly referred to human beings [of whatever ethnicity or tribe] who occupied the upper three Vannas, that of Brahmin, Kshatriya, and Vaishya. Originally it did not mean a specific ethnicity of people. Arya meant Noble & Honorable:

In Pali and Buddhism the word “Arya” is Ariya:

Meaning things like Noble person, honorable person, a gentleman, one who is well-bred, one who is well-born, one who is aristocratic in nature, and so on. Ariya is related to the Pali word Ayya:

Meaning things like: Sir, Sire, Master, Honorable, one who is worthy [“worshipful” in archaic English].

You find the word Ariya in Buddhism here:

As well as here:

And so, those at the top three levels of the caste system were humans of Noble and Honorable quality, nature, and ethos. Called “Arya” back in such ancient times. And the humans at the lower levels – the Underlings – were ignoble. The Sanskrit word for “ignoble” is Anarya, which is the negative particle “An” plus the word Arya. In English that word is “Unaryan.” You can still see that our English negative particle “Un” is related to the Sanskrit “An.” Says the Bhagavad Gita 2.2:

In Pali and Theravada Buddhism, Anarya [Sanskrit] is “Anariya” [An+Ariya]. Anariya are the breed of people/humans who are not Ariyapuggala – not Noble People, not noble or honorable in quality and nature. They are ignoble, dishonorable, disrespectful, barbaric, belligerent, underdeveloped, uncultured, rough, uncouth. They are mundane, generic, common. They are the breed and type of people/humans Old Europe would have described as being “Savage.” Should mean “Feral” as in feral humans like the primitive aborigine tribes found in Africa, the Amazon jungle, Papua New Guinea. As opposed to the Noble, Cultured people/humans who live in and are members of Civilization proper. And by civilization, we mean a social order.

In the same way – all humans think alike – and in proper context or time and place, the various tribes and ethnicities of people living in Central Asia, who referred to themselves as the Ary/Ari/Aria/Arya, had for themselves 6000 years ago: 1) a city-state civilization, 2) the science of smelting ore and making metal tools and weapons, & 3) the science of domesticating and riding horses. 6000 years ago the Arya were alone in possessing those three things. Then the Aryan diaspora took place, which eventually cause those Aryans to disperse into other lands. And so when those highly developed Aryans encountered other human beings 6000 years ago: such other human beings were very primitive, did not have any kind of civilization, did not know what ore and metal was, did not ride horses. In proper time and place, as one of those Arya, you’d judge those other humans as being primitive, undeveloped, backwards, ignorant, savage, feral, ignoble, not the best or highest or most excellent breed of human being: they were Anarya. And such Anarya breed of humans had no sense of, know nothing about, had no understanding of civilization, society, social order.

And when we say social order, we mean a System. And when we say system we mean a composite cybernetic entity composed parts where each part has a function to perform in order for 1) the system to function & 2) each member-unit to derive well-being. Such as an ecosystem. And so therefore, in order for a system, such as human society or an ecosystem, to function properly, structure and hierarchy is needed, where members of said social order or system are divided into classes or peer groups according to nature, abilities, aptitude, merit, quality, skills, intelligence level, function, nobility, and so on.

Regarding Breed

Like there are different Breeds of dogs: there are different Breeds of humans. It should be obvious. In the old days it was obvious. When an olden-time European, from a very developed social order travels abroad to new lands, and he sees an indigenous human being, naked, living in trees and huts, without writing and so on, they called such people “savages.”

There was a time, in ancient times when the area and city of Angkor [as in Angkor Wat] in the Khmer Empire, when it was the largest metropolis in the world. And so, when a member of Angkor ventured out into the far jungles, and they saw and interacted [traded] with the dark skinned feral aboriginal hill tribes, such primitive, uncultured, aboriginal people were not in character, quality, breed, and kind similar or alike to your own kind, and so if you and your kind refer and consider yourselves to be civilized, cultured, well-bred, noble in disposition [re: ariya/arya], then those underdeveloped human beings were naturally understood to be anariya/anarya, which mean things like: ignoble, feral, wild, having no quality of nobleness, not of an excellent breed, not of a noble breed. Like cultivated Japanese rice versus Wild Rice: one is an excellent Breed of rice with good quality and the other is wild rice. And so the Anariya/Anarya were/are Savages:

The Pali word Vanna was annexed into the Khmer language were it means: Good Looking, Handsome, Beautiful. And is usually a proper name for boys and men, but some girls have that word as a name also. Beauty is a cultural phenomenon. We spend our whole human lives inside of a culture, surrounded by people like ourselves. And so, culturally, people who look like us, with appealing faces to look at are “beautiful, and good looking; handsome.”

And so phrases like “those of our Vanna” and “those not of our Vanna” have interesting contextual meaning. Those of our Vanna, means “those of our breed and kind, who look like us, behave like us, who are beautiful, live like us, are human in the way that we are human.” And the phrase “those not of our Vanna,” means “those who are not of our breed and kind, who do not look like us, who are ugly, unpleasant to look at and behold, who do not live like us, who are human in a different way than how we are human.”

The word for “Ugly” in Khmer is “Akrok,” which also means “Bad, Wicked, Mean, Unkind-hearted, not capable of sharing, untrustworthy.” And so, the Khmer word “Pug-akrok” [pug = puggala] means Criminal, Bad People, People who Harm You, Thief, Gang Member. Pug-Akrok literally means People [pug/pudgala/puggala] + Ugly [akrok]. Ugly People: people who do not look like you, who are not your kind and breed.

Kurupa [ku+rupa] being similar to our English word “Corrupt” in meaning.

Du+Rupa [form, shape, well-formed, appearance]:

Ill-Formed [du-rupa, ku-rupa] meaning both ugly and bad/evil:

The Greek Kakos + Kamomenos:

Kako+kamomenos means ugly:

For more detailed information about Beauty, Intelligence, Evolution, Natural Selection, Sexual Selection, and how they correlate and correspond with each other, see this essay in Nexion Zine: The Neotic Hypothesis Of Evolution.

Just like each dog breed has its own look, appearance, temperament, intelligence level: humans also have breeds where each breed has its own look, appearance, temperament, intelligence level.

Just like how animals and plants, over great spans of time, change and develop/evolve according to their environment: humans also change and develop/evolve according to the environment of each group/tribe. Which is why Black people have very dark skin: because there is a lot of ultraviolet light/radiation hitting sub-Sahara Africa. Your environment even influences the shape and look of your nose:

Humans who developed in cold climates will have tall noses with small/narrow nostrils to keep cold air from lowering the body’s temperature. Whereas Africans have flat noses and big nostrils in order to allow a lot of air to cool the body from the heat of their ancestral environment. Same principle fractally expresses itself in elephants: African elephants have very big ears as a way to cool their bodies down due to the heat of the environment, whereas Asian elephants live in a place that is not as hot, and so they have small ears.

And so, because of the fact that humans have existed in our present form for circa 300,000 years in various places around the earth, in different climates and environments: it’s simply an observable fact that various groups of humans look different than others. You can cry and bitch that race doesn’t exist, but the natural observable fact remains: East Asians have narrow slanty eyes and White Europeans don’t; Africans have very dark skin and Irish people don’t; etc.

Look and Appearance goes even further than skin color and eye or nose shapes. Your life style and health influence how you look. People who eat like pigs, or who have an eating disorder where they constantly eat shit – unhealthy foods – will be fat or obese. It’s obvious that an obese person looks different than a slim person. If you have a group of 12 fat people in the same room: that is a Breed, a Kind, a Type of people, a subset of a variation of human being.

We can all tell those two guys apart. One is a nerd and the other is a bike gang affiliate. They are both White, but they are different Breeds, Kinds, Types, subcastes [Varnas/Vannas have subcastes] of people. Each breed has their own quality, character, temperament, level of intelligence, capacity, proclivity, interests, and so on.

Which of those two guys would you most likely hire to be your accountant or to manage your stock portfolio? The nerd. And so, that nerd’s Vanna – his subcaste – in accordance with his Dharma, functions well as accountants, thinkers, mathematicians, computer coders, and so forth. And that biker guy, according to his Vanna and Dharma, has his own function, activity, job, behavior, interests that he and his Breed excel at. And so we are talking about Excelling at things/function and of Excellence.

If there is an orange tree which produces goodly shaped oranges, with soft sweet flesh, and you judge such oranges to be good and of Excellent quality and nature: then you propagate more of those Kinds of Trees, by Breeding more of them, thereby producing more such Breeds of oranges. In order to maintain, to continue, the propagation of such Excellence, such excellent quality.

Arya, culturally means also both Master and Excellent. The meaning of “Master”:

In Khmer, our word for “Master” is “Mei,” which sounds exactly like the English word “May.” Mei literally means “Female.” And since the Khmer, since ancient times, were/are matriarchal, the very word for “Female,” mean also things like: Manager, Boss, Leader, Master, Lord, Chief, Head, Most High, Above Everything. If someone asks you: “Who is the Mei of your country?” They are asking you who is the Leader/Head/Chief of your country, The Boss. Even if he is a male, he is still the Mei, because he’s the Boss, the Top, the Most High.

And so what we in English call “Mother of Vinegar” the Khmer call “Mei of Vinegar,” because the Mei of Vinegar is the Boss, the Master, the Progenitor, the Creator, of Vinegar. If there is a strain or breed of rice crop that Exels or Exceeds the quality of all other rice crops, that most Excellent Rice crop is said to the Mei of Rice crops: the Master, the Leader, the Most High, the Most Elevated of all kinds of rice crops. The Mei of Grapes is the Best, the Most Excellent, The Master, The Chief, of all breeds and strains of grapes: The Master Breed of Grapes. The Mei of Wine is the Most Excellent, The Master Breed of all kinds of Wine: skillfully and Masterfully crafted by the best wine makers, using the best breed of grape vines. To Master something, means to have the best, the highest, most complete skill of that something:

To be “Arya,” means to be the Best, the Most Excellent, Most Noble, Most Honorable, Most Virtuous, the Most High Quality and Breed of Manussa [human] than all other human breeds. That’s Arya, Mastery, and Excellence. And so, if you value such Excellent Quality of Human, and you value the kinds of knowledge, science, philosophy, inventions, civilizations, etc, that such Most Excellent Quality of Human can create/manifest/make: then you conserve and preserve that Most Excellent Breed.

If you had a business which did well in generating revenue, that Breed or Strain or Type, of business you have will propagate and spread, were you will make more such businesses and other will copy your type of business.

And so like an orchard is to a certain strain or breed of oranges, a Varna of the caste system and its subvarnas, are like orchards which produces, continually, certain Breeds or Strains or Types of humans, of certain quality, skill, aptitude, nobility, bravery, excellence, and so on. In that way, a society or civilization is replenished with those various Breeds and Types of humans, which in turn causally allows the society or civilization to function as it does from generation to generation, century after century.

Regarding Hegemony

If you value such things as Leadership skills, of Exemplar conduct, of Excellence that should be emulated, then there is nothing wrong or evil about the concept of Hegemony:

One of the meanings of hegemony is “preponderance”:

Preponderance means stuff like: large number, vast distribution, all over the place, big quantity, so many that you out number others of your category, and so on.

I’m sure there are other Types/Breeds/Kinds/Strains of apples. But red apples dominates the apple-space. Red apples, when compared to other kinds/breeds of apples are more popular with humans. They thus have a hegemony in that apple-space. There are of course many factors that give them that hegemony/dominance/preponderance.

Phones did not always look like the phones we have today. In the very old days, phones were small clam shell flip phones, which didn’t have many capabilities or “apps.” What changed all that was the iPod created by Apple Inc.

The iPod of 2006ish-2007ish was big, slate shaped in form, had a big flat touch screen, has button-icons for apps you can download to invigorate your iPod with new functions and capabilities. That iPod design was quickly merged with phone capacity, and thus, the first iPhone came out in 2007.

At that time, the iPhone was so new in look and design, that many people and well established phone companies laughed at it. But the younger generations began to buy those iPhones and they/we abandoned the clam shell flip phones. This was when something special took place: the iPhone, and its design, achieved hegemony in the phone-space: it Thrived. The iPhone dominated that phone-space, set the standards, raised the bar, set the trend, dictated by power of influence what all future phones should look like.

Therefore, as a phone company competing in that phone-space, you had very few options: you either copy-catted that design, or you went bankrupt. Half the phone companies chose to continue manufacturing the clam shells, and the other half decided to make phones that look and function like the iPhone. Eventually, two phone companies would dominate the phone-space: Apple and Samsung.

That’s what Hegemony looks like in practice and in real life. It’s nothing wrong or evil or sinister or hateful. It’s simply success at thriving against competition in a given environment/space. Hegemony is simply being Better than others around you, inspiring other to do what you do, look like you look or go extinct. Those clam shell flip phones went extinct.

This is the Principle/Law of Genetic/Memetic Domination, Genetic/Memetic Drift, and Horizontal Gene Transfer [HGT]. That Principle [set of principles] are necessary for developmental evolution here on earth. That principle is Fractal and can be found anywhere in nature and in human civilization, including in human language.

Dinosaurs did not all go extinct. Some grew feathers, and eventually evolved the capacity to fly. Those that did fly, dominated dinosaur-space. That dominance – in number as well as in the power to out compete rivals – caused genetic drift, where minor mutations gradually occurred. And such genetic drift, as well as environmental adaptation/influence, caused to arise into being Birds. That’s the Principle of Hegemony in play in the real world. Those dinosaurs proved that they can thrive. Thus, they were able to set the trend or standard, to call the shots, to lead or spearheaded their trajectory of evolution to where their flying descendants ruled the skies. Mother Nature is cut-throat. In order for Mother Nature to survive for billion and billions of years, she requires organisms that can not only survive, but thrive. And “thrive” means to be better than others. To be the Most Excellent: The Master. To be the Exemplar. To set the standard for the future. To be the template of the future.

Silk originates in China. In ancient times the Chinese jealously guarded information about where silk came from and how to make it. The silk was used to eventually make a Style/Strain/Type of vestment call “Han Fu.” Han Fu, to this day, is exceptionally beautiful. The Han Fu eventually became a mark of status. The more privileged you were, the more servants you had, the less work you had to do: the longer and bigger your Han Fu sleeves. Emperors sometimes wore Han Fu which had sleeves that were so ridiculously long that they dragged along the floor several feet behind the emperor as he walked. And so, the Han Fu, in that time and space, achieved hegemony, and dominated cultural vestments.

International trade, and diplomacy, played the part of producing Genetic/Memetic Drift for the Han Fu. Statesmen and traders from Japan and India saw the people in China with status wear the Han Fu, and they wanted their own kind/style of Han Fu for their own people. And so, the Han Fu, in Japan mutated into this:

And in India, the Han Fu mutated into this:

And it is from India’s mutation of the Han Fu, that the girls and men of status of the Khmer Empire developed their/our Traditional Garments:

The Thai, Lao, Burmese, and Balinese later borrowed the Khmer’s mutation of India’s mutation of the Han Fu.

This principle of genetic/memetic hegemony also applies to styles/strains/types/breeds of Architecture:

The ancient Chinese temple and its distinct style of upwards curved roofing, eventually dominated Temple Architecture. That dominance, domination, set the standard, and that style/breed/type of roofing spread far, and can be found everywhere in the sinosphere, including Thailand:

Of course you have the ancient Greek style/strain/type/breed of temple/stately architecture:

Compared with the beautiful and majestic Neo-Classical Style/strain/breed of architecture of Washington D.C.:

The ancient Greek genetic/memetic strain of architecture versus the contemporary genetic/memetic strain of architecture of Neo-Classical should show you the immense Power of Hegemony: When you have successfully Thrived and you have achieved a level/state/status of total dominance/domination of your environment/space: the Laws of Nature gives you the Power to Set the Standard and to influence the future and future generations of human beings and human society/civilization, even for thousands and thousands of years. Even after you [the ancient Greeks] are gone. That is not only called a Legacy, but it is Aeonic Magick.

When the United States of America was newly born as a nation-state, the other states/kingdoms in Europe laughed at America and mocked it. America wasn’t cool like those Old World kingdoms. It had no king, no nobility, no ancient history, no respect earned. It was just a bunch of poor dumb rebels with some dumb piece of paper with philosophical rambling scribbled on it called a Constitution, and some guy called a mere “President.” And those dumb rebels had the silly notion of choosing their “President” to lead them, instead of having a King or Emperor made such by the will and decree of God and Pope. They mocked and laughed.

Eventually, all these people from Europe migrated to the laughable America, because it turns out: no human being desires to be oppressed by some king or some pope. And so, as America grew in size and population, it eventually Thrived as a nation-state. And that Thriving eventually caused it to become a Superpower, with huge amounts of coolness and social credit. Which meant that America had achieved hegemonic power and influence on the earth and over the entire human population of the world, directly and/or indirectly.

And the Laws of Nature Blesses the One with Hegemony by allowing it to call the shots and set the standards and be a template for the Future. And so, it came to be on earth, that most nation-states now copy-cat America where they have their own written constitutions, and they elect their own leaders. Now even the nations that once mocked and laughed at America – The United Kingdom and other European Kingdoms – also give their citizens civil liberty and elect their officers, even having Constitutional Monarchies. Nobody wants to be a king anymore, and everyone wants to be a President. That’s Hegemony, and the power of Hegemony: those other nations had better copy-cat America: or they go extinct. You fucking Emulate the Best, the Most Excellent: or you die, or you lose your fucking power, or you lose your fucking wealth, your fucking prestige, your fucking empire. Where is the British Empire now? The Spanish Empire? You Copy the fucking Master: The Best, The Most Excellent! Or you Die and go Extinct. There is nothing wrong or evil with Hegemony. It’s how evolution works in the real world. That which has Hegemony owns the Future, genetically and memetically.

We human beings, and a large percentage of animals on earth, are the living Legacy of a species of tiny mammals who achieved hegemony million and million of years ago in their environment/space. They were successful and thrived, their population/number grew, genetic mutations occurred in their population/species, which caused genetic drift, new species from their form arose gradually. It’s simply how Nature and Evolution works: The Best, The Most Excellent in quality and skill and intelligence: thrive, are blessed by Mother Nature with hegemonic power and influence, and forges the Future. We humans are the Legacy and living Testament of a species of tiny mammals who achieved genetic hegemony. Just like Greece and Rome still wield an influence upon our Western civilizations, even after thousands of years after their civilization fell: because in ancient history, those people/race and their respective social orders [society] achieved civilizational hegemony.

Human Society

There are different kinds/strains/types of human societies. A “society” to a human being is like a “forest” is to a tree. A tree by itself can survive and grow, make seeds and propagate itself. But it can easily die from various causes. If it should die, then that tree’s strain/breed gets wiped out or even goes extinct. In order for Mother Nature to ensure/insure that such breed or strain of tree has a greater chance of propagating their kind, she collects those trees together into a tight-knit social order, amalgamation, cluster, group, band, society, tribe of trees, called a forest. That forest becomes an ecosystem, where the whole system itself generates welfare and well-being for all of its parts and units: trees, other plants, animals, bugs, fungus, bacteria, everything.

Thus, in such an ecosystem: everything has a place and a niche function. Maggots eat dead meat. Fungus decomposed dead biomass. Trees make flowers, flowers make nectar, bees take the nectar then pollinate the flower and make the nectar into honey, trees make fruit, birds and monkeys have the niche function of eating those fruit and scattering the seeds of the trees around the place. And so, the trees symbiotically trade their nectar and fruit [their “labor” and “goods”] in exchange for the “services” of other organisms [in human terms, we call that an “economy”], and that symbiosis increases, to a greater exponential extent, the survival and thrivability of the trees. Predators and the adversarial conditions of the environment is the Resistance factor which keeps the population of members of that ecosystem in a natural state of populational equilibrium. And so, even viruses have a niche function in an ecosystem: they are a part of the Resistance factor. Resistance factor meaning that there are factors which resists your species from overpopulating a given ecosystem/environment/biome, which would cause an imbalance/disruption in the system.

In the human arena, our societies [forest of humans], come in all shapes and sizes and designs and models. The most primitive and ancient are the small band of familial clans/kin. You also have tribes. You have conglomeration of tribes. You have city-states. You have kingdoms. You have nation-states. You have empires. You have federations. You have matriarchies. You have theocracies. And so on. They all compete to be the Best, the Most Functional style/breed/type of society/civilization. Just like there exists competition in Nature and in the business world. Healthy competition breeds innovation, which drives evolution, and the gradually Betterment Towards Excellence.

And so, in ancient times, the population of the Chinese were small. The small groups of ancient Chinese people formed various designs/styles/strains/types of societies. The monarchal-imperial design eventually achieved a state of hegemony in the region of East Asia. And that hegemonic East Asian Chinese society/civilization functioned properly to where its members/citizens derived welfare and well-being, sufficient enough to cause those Chinese people to Thrive, and their population exploded into a billion human beings.

And so, very much like a forest or orchard: if your society works well, if it can produce for your people welfare and well-being, and if your society produces human beings of good quality: then you would obviously desire for the dominant race/people who created such a society/civilization to continue to dominate that society. Because ultimately: it is the Breed, Quality, Nature, Ethos, Mental Capacity, Cybernetic Capacity, Dharma of such a people to collectively and symbiotically produce such a style/type of society/civilization. It’s simple Math: if Y produces X and X is good in valuation/judgement, then you keep Y. If you replace Y, than the end result of the equation will not be X. And so regarding Chinese civilization: Y = the Han Race/Ethnicity who has hegemony in their society/civilization. If you replaced the Han with some other ethnicity such as the Uyghur, you will get a society/civilization which manifests a very different end result then one ruled and dominated by the Han.

The same with Western civilization and its nation-states. A society/civilization such as America was created by a certain Type/Breed/Strain of human beings, typically called White Europeans [primarily British and German in those olden days, let’s say “Germanic,” or White Anglo-Saxon Protestant]. And their civilization of America works very damn good! Good enough to not only become the only superpower on earth, but good enough to produce for its citizens welfare, security, and well-being. And their America even produces some very good Breeds of human beings: some of the most greatest scientists, inventors, religious thinkers, philosophers, statesmen, artists, musicians, military thinkers, and so on, were and are American.

And so therefore, if America was an Orchard of Fruit trees, and the type and quality of people this orchard produces is good, and the life and lifestyle its citizens have is good in quality, and its citizens have welfare and well-being, then we keep Y in order to continue to produce X. Y in this case = people of White European descent. In other words, in order to maintain how America functions and the Fruit America produces, the ethnic and racial descendants of the people who created America should be allowed to maintain Hegemony in America because: 1) Their ancestors created this nation-state & 2) They have obviously created a social order that works good: good enough for other races of human beings to want to live here and to Covet the welfare and well-being that America produces.

If we replace the variable Y [White Anglo-Saxon Protestants] with some other Breed or group of human, we will mathematically generate a different end result. And the type, quality, capacity of such other race or group of people directly affects the causal – cause and effect – outcome of the society they will make.

And we know that these other people don’t have the Nature and Capacity to make a functioning society. How do we know this? Simple: what nation-state in Africa functions properly where it gives its citizens proper welfare and well-being? None. Which is why millions of Africans are fleeing their countries. How many nation-states in Latin America give its citizens welfare, security, and well-being? None, which is why they are fleeing their countries and trying to get into America. And so if such races/people can’t make a society work properly in their own countries, on their own landmasses: what makes you think that if you give them America they will make it work properly? Do thistles make figs?

Most people – usually idealistic Leftists – don’t seem to notice or understand that the BLM Negros here in America out in those streets burning cities and streets down, using collective brute violence to force others to do things their way, using violence and burning shit down, and killing people to express their political and social dissatisfactions is the same fucking shit that Negros in African nation-states do! Why? Because it is simply in their Nature/Dharma as a Breed to behave in that anariya manner.

There was a term for such mode of behavior and violence in the old days: Tribal warfare. Because these Negros are by Nature and Breed a tribally conscious breed of humans. Meaning that their state of conscious development is tribal, which is a primitive form and species of human society [collective/cybernetic awareness/capacity].

They are an Anarya/Anariya Breed of humans. And such Breeds of humans have a different Vanna, a different nature, a different ethos, a different level of intelligence, a different temperament, a different quality than White Europeans or East Asians. These people are not of our Vanna. Not our Breed. Not our Kind. Not our Peers. Not our Equals. Actions speak louder than words, and the Fruit of our actions speak louder than the actions. These Anarya/Anariya people can go through the motion of having their own countries and nations all they want: but the nations they have created are not only Broken – are dysfunctional, Dalit – but their nations [their social order, how they order and behave as a collective organized entity/system] is a testament and Expression/Manifestation of what such Breed of Anarya/Anariya are capable of manifesting, their capacity: it’s not much, it’s primitive, it’s barbaric, it’s dysfunctional.

Chinese people in China have the obvious right to have hegemony/domination over their civilization, because its their country/civilization. In America, White Anglo-Saxon Protestants have the right to dominate [have hegemony] of this country/civilization. And in Africa, Negros can dominate that place all they want. And they do, and the countries they have – as a people and breed – manifested are stupid and shitty countries. If Y produces X and X = shitty dysfunctional tribal minded country, and you put Y in power of America, what will you have if not X? Thistles don’t make figs. You can’t expect African Humans to be capable of producing/manifesting/materializing anything beyond what African Humans are capable of producing according to their Nature, Ethos, Dharma, Mental Capacity, state of conscious development.

Tribal minded meaning how this Woke shit, is in essence and weltanschauung: tribal in nature. Their Critical Race Theory is tribal where it tribalizes Blacks into one group and Whites into an enemy group. That’s primitive in view and capacity of mind. That’s African shit. People and races in Europe and East Asia have developed consciously beyond tribal awareness. What do you think gangs are? Tribes. What essentially are gang wars? Tribal wars. And so it’s no surprise that the races that are into these street gangs are underling races.

Closing Remarks

A nation, civilization, organization, society, city, city-state, group, government, or any collection of humans, is only as good as the people who lead and influence it. There is no such thing as Equality in nature. And due to the fact that each race of human being have developed in different climate zones, and have physically and mentally adapted to different environments and environmental pressures, each race has differing Qualities, Aptitudes, Mental Capacity, Temperaments, Levels of Conscious Development, Level of Intelligence, Dharma.

And so therefore, just because Europeans can make for themselves countries that work good and proper, and just because East Asians can make for themselves countries that work good and proper, doesn’t mean that Black people and Brown people can create countries that work like our countries. This should be Obviously observable. You simply have to study all of the nation-states in sub-Sahara Africa, and all of the nation-states of Central America, and most countries in South America to see what kind of country such Black and Brown people have the capacity to manifest and if their countries work good and proper or not. If their countries worked good and proper: they wouldn’t be fleeing their countries in the millions, risking life and limb to come to Western countries.

By “working good and proper,” what is meant is that a properly functioning society of humans [nation, civilization, city] should generate the following things for each of their member-units [citizens, legal residents]: 1) Welfare, 2) Security, 3) Well-Being.

I don’t mean foodstamps and the welfare system by the word “welfare.” I’m using that word by its older meaning. By Welfare, I mean to say that a citizen of a civilization requires certain things in order to be content and happy, such as: creature comforts, personal liberty [so long as you harm none: do as you will], an income to buy food and items they need, a home of some kind to live in, family and friends, some leisure time to relax and do idle things. Welfare also means that if or when you need help, whatever the nature of the help may be: that there exists institutions and mechanisms which can offer you the help you need. If you are homeless: there is help for you. If you are hungry: there is help for you. If you are in need of spiritual comfort: there is help for you. If you are sick or diseased: there is help for you. If you are unemployed: there is help for you. If you are too old to work and can’t pay your bills: there is help for you.

The underlying concept and principle of Welfare is known as Metta in Theravada Buddhism, which means things like “loving kindness,” “compassion,” “brotherly love,” “the love and fellowship of friends,” where such compassion or love is directed always at alleviating the Dukkham [suffering, stress, distress, anguish, discomfort, worry, etc] of our fellows. In Traditional Christianity, Metta is known as Caritas. Essentially, Metta/Caritas simple means to be kind with and to give a shit about others.

By “Security,” I mean a number of things. Security meaning the Feeling of Being Safe From Harm & Danger. In primitive tribal times, security meant that you and your fellow tribesmen are safe from being killed by other tribes. In our modern nation-states, security means knowing and feeling safe that your government won’t hurt you or harm you so long as you are law abiding, that other fellow citizens won’t hurt or harm you, that you know and feel that you and your family members and children will not be hurt or harmed by the state, officials, other citizens.

Security means that your nation-state or civilization ensures/insures that your people exist in a place free of Himsa and free of the worry [Dukkham] of Himsa. In other words, that your country operates and functions according to the Civilizational Principle of Ahimsa and possesses the Condition of Metta/Caritas. Because of this principle, I do not personally like or agree with Capital Punishment.

When a country or civilization has the capacity to generate for its citizens/people Welfare and Security, then the Condition of Well-Being arises in your population. In reality, and Fundamentally, people from Africa, the Islamosphere, and Latin America aren’t fleeing to Western countries because of political unrest, social unrest, economic depression, poverty, and so on. All of those things are symptoms of Causes. And such things cause people to not have Welfare and Security, and a sense of Well-Being. And so Fundamentally, what such people come to Western countries for is Well-Being.

The Problem is that not every country works well and proper where such country generates for their people welfare, security, and well-being. Because a nation is only as good as the people who have created it, who run/rule it [dominate], and who influence it. And people are only as good as their Nature, Dharma, Vanna, Ethos, Aptitudes, and Capacities.

And so, therefore, in order for a nation that works good and proper to come into being, to exist, you need people of Noble quality, people who are by Nature and Dharma Honorable: Arya/Ariya. There is no such thing as equality in Nature, and so not every race and person possesses the same amount/capacity of Nobility/Honor. For example: a high capacity for Honor is like when a Captain of a ship goes down, drowns, with his sinking ship. Low capacity for Honor is when a ship is sinking, and the Captain uses the only raft to save himself and he lets the rest of the people on the ship to drown. There is a difference in Capacity of noble and honorable Nature/Ethos. And you can tell if a person is noble or honorable by the Fruit of their actions. Likewise you can tell if a race or ethnicity is noble or honorable by the Fruit of their collective actions.

Hence the caste system and how it is structured:

The upper three levels are occupied by people and ethnicities of noble and honorable Nature, Quality, Ethos, Dharma. The lower two levels are populated with the underlings, the undeveloped human beings, the feral, the wild, the tribal, the savage races. A civilization, nation, government, or organization is only as good as the people who have created it and who maintain it. There is Brahma the creator, and Vishnu the Maintainer. And when such things stop functioning properly: there is Shiva the destroyer.

Unfortunately, the various ideologies we have today, such as Egalitarianism, has turned that caste system upside-down, to where we now exist in a civilization which is actually backwards:

Not only is our current society upside-down, but it is also missing parts to it. Our Liberal/Leftist world has gotten rid of Traditional Religion: there are no more Sages, no more monks, no more nuns, no more philosophers. Our academics are retards who don’t think or learn but rather memorized pet theories and accepted ideology. Our scientists are fallacy prone atheists/materialists. And so we have no more “Brahmin” class in our society.

We also have gotten rid of Monarchism or the Power of the Monarch. And have replaced the Monarchy with groups of people and career political profiteers [career “politicians” who work politics to get rich/power] who are driven by emotive ideologies and influenced by lobby groups and special interest groups and personal profit. We have no more aristocrats of noble or honorable quality influencing our civilization as statesmen, diplomats, advisors, officials, or governors. We still have Warriors. But without Sages and Spiritual influence, and the guidance of noble and honorable aristocracy, our Warriors are mere mercenaries of governments who get paid to engage in meaningless emotive and/or ideological battles: the whole war in Afghanistan and Iraq thing was senseless, meaningless, emotionally driven engagements. And so we have no more Kshatrya class.

All we have are the Vaishyas [corporations, CEO, companies], the Sudras [underlings, commoners, mundanes], and the Dalits. Just a bunch of Corporations, undeveloped breeds of humans, and broken people, fighting each other to be king of the Hill. People and corporation that are ego-centered, who think only about their own gains and profits, as opposed to possessing a developed sense of Cybernetic Awareness.

Cybernetic Awareness simply means that you are consciously aware that you are a member-unit of a system Greater than yourself, and so therefore you have the Capacity to be Considerate [to consider the condition and needs] of other member-units, to possess the Dharma of Metta/Caritas, and to justify your actions by balancing your own needs with the needs of the System itself. Because the System, the Ecosystem, the Society, is the Orchard which produces the Fruit. And if that Orchard is to continue to produce good quality fruit – welfare, security, well-being – then it needs to function properly and optimally.

The other unfortunate thing about our current Western society is that the remaining three castes – corporations, common underlings, and broken people, are working to undo the status quo of White Hegemony.

In the East, East Asians have the natural right to possess and hold domination and hegemonic rule/influence over their civilization, because they made that civilization. The same with the West. A country like America was created into being by White Europeans. And so therefore, if America works good and proper, where it generates welfare, security, and well-being, to the point where living here is Coveted, then leave the Status Quo alone and let the White people continue to maintain rule/influence of their civilization: because they made it. If Y produces X and X = the way America worked good and proper; and you replace Y with some other race, then you obviously change the value of X.

The unfortunate and difficult thing for the White population of America is that in time, if they do not fix their immigration policies: they will grow to become the minority race; and Black and Brown people will be the New Majority. Which in turn means that Y has been replaced/displaced. Which then means that X will have a different value. What will the value of X be? Well, you simply have to have a look at the nations such Blacks and Browns have created around the world [Africa, and Latin America]. The Fruit never falls far from the tree, as the old people say in my culture. Or as Jesus said: Figs don’t grow from thistles.

I am, by dharma and disposition, a Traditionalist. The word “Traditionalism” has ethnic context obviously. Different ethnicities have different Traditions, obviously. But there are some universal concept to Traditionalism: I believe that Traditional Religion is very important and has a place in civilization. Traditional Religion in the West meaning things like the Catholic Church, Anglicanism, Mormonism, etc.

Another universal element of Traditionalism is that I believe that Traditional Culture, Ethnic Culture, Folk Culture, is very important. Culture is literally what made us human, as it played a huge part in our process of evolution into the creatures that we are. Both Traditional Religion and Traditional Culture together behave like Glue, which coagulates, binds, unites, people into a functioning social order. When you remove those two variables from the equation: you have the gradual deterioration of Civilization and of Racial Coherence. How so?

Because of what the Buddha said: Everything that physically exists in this physical universe are composite Aggregate entities. And therefore, what is made of aggregated parts, will in time dis-aggregate, what is made of Parts will in time fall Apart. What is Structured will in time be De-Structed.

And so, a society, a social order, a civilization, is an organized aggregation of humans. What binds or unifies such humans into an aggregated entity are Traditional Religion and Traditional Culture. When you remove those two factors, your civilization begins to decay: enters its stage of decadence. The last factor that holds a civilization together is the Status Quo of the hegemonic race/ethnicity who created and influenced the civilization: when they lose their dominance, their dominating influence, and when you no longer have Traditional Religion and Traditional Culture: you have societal collapse.

The reality [re: realism] is that races and civilizations collapse and vanish. We hate to admit it or think about it. What ever happened to the ancient Egyptian Race and Civilization? They are gone, vanished. How about the Mayans who built those great Mayan pyramids? They are also gone. Whatever happened to the Khmer Empire that built that Angkor Complex? It’s gone too. Why? Because if you remove or replace the ruling hegemonic race and you get rid of Traditional Religion and Traditional Culture you have societal collapse. And the aftermath of societal collapse is the Deterioration of Racial Coherence.

In ancient times, the Khmer Empire was ruled by a race of people who came from Northern India, called the Kamboja-Aryans. That was the hegemonic race of that civilization. Naturally, their Traditional Religion and Traditional Culture was Brahmanism, not Buddhism. The collapse of the Khmer Empire began when Buddhism was imported and displaced Brahmanism, and when other races from the nearby areas came to the empire and began mixing with the Kamboja-Aryans. And so, when that empire/civilization collapsed, you then have the disintegration of that Race: today, 90% of the Khmer are mixed with Chinese. There is no such thing as a pure bred Khmer on earth. The ancient Kamboja-Aryans who once lived in that place, have been bred into genocidal extinction. They only exist in trace amounts within the genes of the upper classes of the Khmer and Thai.

And without those Kamboja-Aryans you will never have anything created by such people, like cool empires. Likewise with East Asians: without East Asians existing you will never have things such race can produce and manifest. Likewise with White Europeans: without White Europeans you will never have things that such race of people can create, produce, manifest: no high science, no space exploration, no civilization that works good and proper. Which in turn causally – cause and effect – means that Humanity as a species, will not develop further. Because what we humans are capable of achieving, is entirely founded upon our Nature, Ethos, Dharma, Aptitudes, and Capacities. Therefore, if Humanity is to ever evolve towards higher states of betterment/advancement: the appropriate civilization is required. Because just as biological/animal evolution takes place in the matrix of an ecosystem, so also does the gradual development/evolution of our human species take place within the matrix of Civilization. And the suchness and capacity of a Civilization is entirely based on the Nature and Quality of the people/race who founds/creates such Civilization.

So whatever happened to the ancient Egyptian Race? They don’t exist anymore. We unfortunately exist in a Causal universe. Causal meaning Cause and Effect, This makes That, X + Y = Z. If you fuck around with any of those parameters/variables: you fuck the whole equation up and fuck up the end results.

The Left, since the end of World War 2 have been working relentlessly to dismantle and destroy Traditional Religion, Traditional Culture, and Traditional Families here in America, for their own profit of wealth and power. They’ve been very successful. And now they are working to disrupt the Status Quo of White Hegemony. If they succeed: America, as a functioning civilization, will Collapse.

/Chloe

 

 


On Rulership & Elites

Posted: May 24th, 2021 | Author: | Filed under: Current Affair, Guest Essays, Monarchism, O9A, O9A Nine Angles, Order of Nine Angles, Order of the Nine Angles, The Sinister Tradition, The Sinisterly Numinous Tradition | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on On Rulership & Elites

[ Originally posted at: On Rulership & Elites | Yorkshire Rounwytha (wordpress.com)  &  On Rulership & Elites – Dark Anchorite (wordpress.com)]

 

“History is a graveyard of aristocracies.” -Vilfredo Pareto

In order to actually create a new social order, an analysis of current society and its power structures is in order.

Mosca observed that all societies are ruled by a numerical minority. From the ancient priesthood of Mexico, to the “right honourable gentlemen” who haunt the corridors of Westminster, they have always been a feature of society. He named this minority the political class. This means that every society could be split between two social classes: the one who rules and the one which is ruled.

According to the modern democratic narrative, there is no longer any ruler class- there exists simply the People and the individuals these People elect to make changes for them (though to regard these elected individuals as “rulers” outright tends to chafe a little against the democratic narrative).

These elected individuals, however, share a lot more in common with the aristocratic rulers of old than they do with ordinary, elected rulers. Firstly, the children of these elected rulers often go on to become rulers themselves. This model is normally referred to as hereditary rulership.

Another feature is that nobody from outside this loose knit circle of rulers and heir apparents may enter into the game of rulership. One or two “populists” may occasionally succeed, but their careers are often short-lived or marred by controversy and relentless attacks from the organ of the “free press”. This is why systemic change via entry into democratic politics is largely ineffective. The system has been in place for far longer than any one person and has built up for itself an impressive immune system with which to repel outsiders.

If you doubt there is a structure of hereditary rulership suffused throughout Western democracy, take a few moments to peruse the list of political families in the UK and the US on Wikipedia. The scale of this phenomenon is quite eye-opening (these ruling families are also known to intermarry at a high rate). Of course, there is nothing conspiratorial about this observation. It’s all there for anyone to see.

In fact, until 1999, the UK House of Lords operated on a system of hereditary peerage. Many of these “political families” conveniently descend from the previous actual ruler class viz. the landed gentry (awkwardly, notice how few of them are Jewish! That bursts that theory). These gentry are in turn often descended from the Norman nobility who invaded England in 1066. Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose.

In reality then, a ruler class, functioning along primarily hereditary lines or organisation of wealth and connections (which can be regarded as a sort of familial network) still thoroughly remains in place today, albeit in a rather more sophisticated and obfuscated way. After all, the democratic narrative would not tolerate open hereditary rule. When the Founding Fathers wrote “no title of nobility shall be granted by the United States“, all they did was ensure ruling dynasties would be able to operate without the use of formal titles.

The general remedy for the entrenchment of the elite class has historically been revolution; this however serves only to introduce more chaos into the system, providing thus further niches within power through which new constellations of elites may enter into the game and the whole system starts over- the fact that revolution means the turning of a wheel isn’t accidental.

Understanding Elite Theory

In Machiavelli’s handbook for rulers, The Prince, he delineates two types of rulers- the Lion and the Fox.

He argues that a prince, in order to be an effective ruler, must from time to time use the nature of both men and beasts wisely to ensure the stability of his regime. He ccompares the use of force and strength to the lion, and the use of guile and deception to the fox, and advises the prince to study them both.

Vilfredo Pareto, an Italian economist and sociologist whose main works centre around the study of wealth and power distribution in society and who formulated the Pareto efficiency (that 80% of the wealth is amassed by 20% of the population), introduced a social taxonomy that included six classes, Class I through Class VI. Class I corresponds to the adventurous “foxes” in Machiavelli, and Class II to the conservative “lions,” particularly in the governing elite. Perhaps we can layer these two terms over our modern political dichotomy of Conservative and Liberal.

The most effective form of government will ideally contain an equal mixture of both; lion-men (Conservatives), capable of decisive and forceful action; and fox-men (Liberals), who are imaginative, innovative, and unscrupulous. Note however that this is the ideal model of government whilst under the rule of a princeps. Without a wise and beneficent leader to reign in these disparate wings in- the sort of ruler of which the writings in The Prince are aimed at- the whole system begins to decay. Such regimes invariably either degenerate into ossified and rigid bureaucracies, or into weak regimes of bickering lawmongers and rhetoricians incapable of decisive and forceful action. Sound familiar?

Pareto’s ideas are quite apposite to our study here as he essentially pioneered Elite Theory. (Interestingly, regarding his work on economics, the inverse of a Pareto efficiency holds true and can be applied to many other areas and to most economic observations- economics being, at its most basic level the science of human interactions. Why this is so remains one of the strange quirks that permeate our universe and which we endeavour to understand via the study of Aeonics). Pareto also argued that democracy was an illusion and that a ruling class always emerged and enriched itself. Very perceptive fellow.

Pareto also taught that the majority of social action is driven by non-logical and non-rational motives, but that we strive to give, through our personal actions a “spurious logicality” to them.
Much of human history is an oscillation between conservatism and risk-taking behaviours within the ruling elite- observing a decline from lion mentality to that of the fox, as per Machiavelli. This invariably leads to social disaster, which results in the dial being set back to the rule of lions and a dominance of conservatism. This model bears similarity to Spengler’s own view of society prior to its entering into it’s Imperial civilizational phase, ruled over by Caesars. It is also at this turning point in a society that we find ourselves on the cusp of, incidentally.

So, we are beginning to see that this unique character of modern governments is nothing more than a thickly applied ideological gloss- in the same way that previous governments adorned masked their elite rulership with a gloss of “divine mandate” or a “will of the Proletariat/Volk”.

Rule With An Iron Claw

Perhaps then what needs to be done now is not to enact some movement opposed to the System and favouring armed insurrection as its weapon of choice. There will be plenty of outliers and extremists to try this method to death, but these movements rely on, among other things, a level of popular support. Its also not conducive to one’s mental health to live in a constant state of revolutionary paranoia. We are elitists; we know that we are not like others, that we strive to possess traits and qualities of which the average person simply has no comprehension. We cultivate these traits, pride ourselves on our master-morality and make no apologies for it. What we need to do now is start acting like the Dark Nobility which we are or which we indeed strive to become.

We believe in rule by those with the ability to lead and of “proper blood”. Hereditary monarchy provides as suitable a method as any, and in this way a prospective ruler can be prepared their entire life for the responsibilities of rulership, usually under the mentorship of one already qualified in doing so. Modern democratic propaganda likes to ascribe a flavour of tyranny to the idea of monarchy (no surprise, given monarchical rulership is the prime rival of the democratic option). However, a monarchy has no need for such top-down centralised economies and blunt methods of control. Dictators need to be in absolute control- their very raison d’etre is predicated on it. However they are in control thanks to the application of force not law. And thus all it takes for someone else to assume the mantle is to remove the current dictator- and thus there are always people trying to assassinate the Dictator.

Not so the Monarch. Eliminate him and you won’t get a coup backed by other opportunists who will help you seize power. Instead you’ll get a royal guard who will summarily dispatch you into small pieces and immediately put the next in line to the throne in charge. There is no need to manage the economy in the same way controlling dictators do either. The freer the markets, the freer the people- once the proper authority has been put in place and everyone is aware of it.


The Perception Of The O9A

Posted: May 24th, 2021 | Author: | Filed under: Alchemy, Anarcho-Nihilism, Anarchy, Church of Satan, Current Affair, David Myatt, Deofel Quartet, Fake News, Far-Right, Howard Stanton Levey, Journalism, Junk Journalism, Labyrinthos Mythologicus, Leftists, Liberals, Media Attention, Michael Aquino, Mundanes, National Socialism, neo-marxism, News, Nihilism, O9A, O9A Nine Angles, Occultism, Order of Nine Angles, Order of the Nine Angles, Reports, Satanic Heresy, Satanic Polemics, Sinister Japes, Temple of Set, The Sinister Dialectic, The Sinister Game, The Sinister Tradition, The Sinisterly Numinous Tradition | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Perception Of The O9A

[ Originally posted at: The Perception Of The O9A – Wyrdsisters ]

 

It is interesting and informative, when considered esoterically and in Aeonic terms, how the perception of the Order of Nine Angles (O9A, ONA, ω9α) and the propaganda directed against it, has changed over the past three decades.

Anti-O9A Propaganda

Decades ago, and until quite recently, the O9A was perceived by outsiders as just “a minor satanic organization” {1} with most anti-O9A propaganda the preserve of self-described satanists who believed in or who followed the egoist ‘satanism’ propagated by Howard Stanton Levey whose aliases included Anton LaVey. This propaganda was spread mostly by means of the medium of the Internet but also in a few books by academics who did not bother to do their own research by studying the O9A corpus, written between 1976 and 2012 by Anton Long, and which academics believed what such Levey-type ‘satanists’ said or wrote about the O9A. This propagandistic image was: (i) of the O9A as not being a true/genuine satanic organization or being  just one or two people, (ii) their belief that Anton Long was David Myatt, for which belief they never presented anything probative, (iii) of the O9A as neo-nazi and promoting nazism, and (iv) of the O9A as unoriginal having plagiarized Crowley, the Church of Satan, Lovecraft, the Temple of Set, and others, with the O9A seven fold Tree of Wyrd just “a replacement for the Kabbalah […] a non-Semitic version of the Kabbalistic Sepherot.”

By 2018 this type of anti-O9A propagated had all but ceased, although it continued to be propagated in books written by academics who still had not bothered to do their own research by studying the O9A corpus and – to give just one example – thus finding the link between the O9A seven fold Tree of Wyrd and the septenary system of both the ancient Pymander tractate of the Corpus Hermeticum and of several Renaissance alchemical texts, from which alchemical texts the O9A (that is, Anton Long) derived their “nine angles” which are the nine combinations of the three basic substances  alchemical Salt, alchemical Mercury, and alchemical Sulphur.

Septenary System, and the three basic alchemical substances
Azoth Sive Aureliae Occultae Philosophorum
, published in 1613 CE

Part of the reason for the demise of the old anti-O9A propaganda was that interest in and membership of both the Church of Satan and the Temple of Set had declined. However, the main reason for the demise of such anti-O9A propaganda was its replacement by the much more widely spread and much more rabid propaganda of anti-fascists, and which new anti-O9A propaganda led not only calls for the O9A to be banned by Western governments because anti-fascists declared the O9A incited hatred, violence, and terrorism, but also led to the O9A being described as “the most extreme far-Right network in the world,” {2} and as “the most dangerous far-right terror movement operating in the world today,” {3} with the chief propagandist behind the anti-fascist campaign declaring, only a few weeks ago following the banning of a neo-nazi group by the British government, that “the government has missed an opportunity to take action against the dangerous Order of Nine Angles….. the Government must take the threat of O9A more seriously and urgently get a ban in place.” {4}

Unsurprisingly, the anti-fascist campaign consisted of lies, and – like the old anti-O9A propaganda of self-described satanists – the people behind the new campaign not only continued with the trope that “Anton Long is David Myatt” but also just like those satanists did not provide and still have not provided anything probative, any evidence, for their claim that Myatt=Long, committing as most of them do the fallacies of argumentum ad populum – because so many believe it it must be true – and argumentum ad verecundiam, that because some academics have also claimed, in books, that Myatt=Long it is true.

Also unsurprisingly, the anti-fascist campaign had fellow-travellers in Britain and elsewhere – including journalists, politicians, teachers, and academics – who spread this new anti-O9A propaganda in the British Parliament, in books, in the mainstream Media, by the medium of the Internet and more recently by “social media” and “podcasts” with one elected politician in America – Elissa Slotkin, a former CIA analyst who currently oversees a U.S. House subcommittee on intelligence and counterterrorism – demanding that the United States government designate the Order of Nine Angles a Foreign Terrorist Organization. {5}

To add spice to their anti-O9A propaganda, anti-fascists used a tactic of the gutter press and hack-journalists to discredit, to smear, people: making sensationalist claims of paedophilia and rape. Thus anti-fascists accused the O9A of encouraging and condoning rape and paedophilia by claiming that around a dozen people who they allege were “linked to” or who they allege were “members of” the O9A have been convicted of crimes of a sexual nature.

It is astonishing that journalists and politicians and so many other people believed and believe, and have repeated and publicized, these sensationalist claims, such allegations, since (i) the claims were and are based on the fallacy of secundum quid et simpliciter – arguing from particular to general, blaming a whole group, movement, or organization for the actions of a few – and (ii) no evidence, nothing probative, is provided and never has been provided by those making such claims in respect of how those they name were “linked to” the O9A, and (iii) no evidence, nothing probative, is provided and never has been provided by those making such claims in respect of those they name as having been “members” of the O9A, and (iv) there is no text in the whole O9A corpus (that is, in the 1976-2012 writings of Anton Long) which support or condone rape and paedophilia, but there are published writings – such as the novella titled The Giving {6} – which suggest that those who indulge in such practices make suitable opfers.

Furthermore, what does being “linked to” the O9A mean? What does being a “member of” the O9A mean and imply? What does ω9α, the O9A, the ONA – the Order of Nine Angles – mean and imply? What is the O9A? A group, an organization, a cult, with members? Or is the O9A a sub-culture which some individuals identify with? Or is the O9A an Occult philosophy which some individuals agree with or which inspires them? Or is ω9α an Occult praxis, or even a way of life such as the Way of the Rounwytha?

Such simple and necessary questions are never asked by those who believe and those who repeat such anti-fascist claims. Why not?

Our Answers

As individuals who have studied the O9A corpus over a period of years and who years ago embarked on the modern quest for Lapis Philosophicus that is the O9A Seven Fold Way {7} our answers to those fundamental questions are as follows:

° The O9A – esoterically, and among ourselves, known as ω9α – is an Occult philosophy (a mystic tradition) described by Anton Long in the O9A corpus which he wrote between 1976 and 2012. This philosophy is a pagan one, encompassing the rural Rounwytha tradition, and suggests an individual and decades-long praxis – the Seven Fold Way – by means of which an individual can achieve Adeptship (individuation) and thence discover Lapis Philosophicus, and which praxis is thus a quest, a pathei-mathos, which can lead to wisdom involving as it does a learning from ordeals and from practical experience.

The roots of this modern syncretic philosophy are in the paganism of Ancient Greece and pre-Christian Britannia and in Hellenic hermeticism.

° As an Occult philosophy, presenced in such an individual praxis, the O9A is not an organization or group which has a leader, a hierarchy of authority, or members. Instead, “members” were defined by Anton Long in a letter to “Kimberly” dated 25th September 1992 eh, and included in facsimile in volume II of The Satanic Letters of Stephen Brown,

“Being a member of the ONA simply means that the individual follows, or tries to follow, the path to Adeptship as outlined in various works including Naos.” {8}

° The Occult philosophy of the O9A is, in these modern times, considered to be antinomian: that is, and for an individual, transgressive and heretical, and in practice can be a Katharsis and – given its principle of the authority of individual judgment {9} – perceived as anarchic and/or as nihilistic, although the individual following the praxis that is the Seven Fold Way learns to go beyond both denotata and the dialectic of conflicting opposites based as that dialectic is on human manufactured categories, -isms and -ologies.

° The O9A can therefore be understood as both an anarchic/nihilist/antinomian sub-culture which, or aspects of which, some individuals identify with, and as a way of living and which way is manifest in both the Rounwytha and the Occult quest that is the Seven Fold Way.

° The O9A – ω9α philosophy – is therefore neither neo-nazi nor satanist although individuals following the Seven Fold Way or who identify with some antinomian aspects of O9A sub-culture may use one or both those -isms as learning experiences and/or as a means of being transgressive and heretical and thus may be perceived by unknowledgable outsiders as “satanists” and/or as “neo-nazis” and also be incorrectly perceived by such unknowledgable outsiders as being “linked to” or as “members” of some non-existent group/organization they believe is named the Order of Nine Angles, the Order of the Nine Angles, or the O9A.

The Reasons For Anti-O9A Propaganda

Why the four-year long and, as of 2021, on-going, strident, intense, hateful anti-fascist campaign of lies, smears, innuendo and propaganda directed at the O9A and at the person anti-fascists claim founded and still leads a group, an organization, named the Order of Nine Angles?

A campaign which includes the demand that the Order of Nine Angles be banned by Western governments because it is a “terrorist” entity and a “dangerous neo-nazi” organization which incites “hatred, violence, murder” and because, in the words of Faye Stephen, a Special Agent of the United States Air Force assigned to the Federal Bureau of Investigation New York Joint Terrorism Task Force, the O9A are:

“supporters of, among other things, jihadist terrorism,” and which O9A is “a Satanic anarchist group founded in the United Kingdom and now operating around the world, including in the United States [and which] has expressed, among other [things], Satanic, anarchist, neo-fascist, neo-Nazi, and anti-Semitic beliefs [and] support for the views of Usama bin Laden,” whose members and associates believe “that since the time of Nazi Germany, Western civilization has become perverted by, among other things, Judeo-Christian beliefs. They therefore seek the violent overthrow [of] Western civilization.” {10}

After several years of considering the matter and of studying the anti-fascist propaganda campaign and its materials, our view as O9A-folk is that there were two phases involved in the four-year long, on-going, anti-fascist campaign against the O9A.

The first phase was and is the anti-fascist campaign itself – the invented lies, the false claims, the smears, the spreading of rumours, the fallacies used and indulged in either deliberating or otherwise. That is, there was a fabrication of a perception of the O9A far removed from the reality of the O9A: in brief, the fabrication of a fictional O9A: demonizing the O9A and those alleged to be associated with or involved with it.

The second phase, completed over a year ago, was convincing enough people – including journalists, politicians, government and police officials, and certain NGO’s (non-governmental organizations) such as the Institute for Strategic Dialogue  {11} and the Counter Extremism Project {12} – that the anti-fascist  fabricated, fictional, O9A is “the truth”.

In our view, the anti-fascists who fabricated their own “evil, dangerous” version of the O9A – and who spread the lies, false claims and smears involved, are “unreasonable and unjust in their seasons of excitement” so that they often speak or write emotively, make hasty judgements, and are intolerant because they are convinced they and their cause are right and that their enemies are not just wrong or misguided but “evil” and therefore must be opposed and their views censored and suppressed.

Which is why they have and had slogans such as “No platform for our opponents,” “Never forgive, never forget,” and “the Holocaust cannot be questioned or doubted,” and why they have fabricated causal abstractions – categories, new transgressions – to describe and label their opponents and the writings, deeds, and speech of their opponents, and campaign to have those deemed to belong to such categories, or who may have committed such transgressions, publicly shamed, deprived of their livelihood, arrested, and imprisoned.

Such new causal abstractions, such new transgressions, such modern heresies, include believing in or affirming the inequality of human races, wanting to live among people of their own race and culture, “hate speech”, “racism”, questioning or doubting holocaustianity (13} – “holocaust denial” – questioning or doubting “nazi crimes”, and believing that fascism and/or National Socialism contained or may have contained some good ideas.

This demonizing of enemies, this fabrication of abstractions, this desire to censor and suppress the views of their enemies, is redolent of the Magian ethos and its penchant for denouncing and persecuting those deemed, by some authority or by some person or persons, to be heretics, and it is no coincidence that the modern manifestation of the Magian ethos that is the anti-fascist movement is derived from Marxist-Leninism and the violent, hate-fuelled, intolerant religious-type and often communist resistance to the rise of fascism and National-Socialism. {14}

Given the Magian ethos, it is also no coincidence that the anti-fascists who fabricated their own “evil, dangerous” version of the O9A – and their fellow-travellers who spread and who are spreading that fictional version of the O9A, are mostly hypocrites: intolerant of and biased toward those persons or causes or groups they deem to be their enemies while at the same time preaching about tolerance, equality, and about the need to be fair-minded. It is this intolerance, this bias, which makes them propagate the fictional anti-fascist version of the O9A and also makes them not bother with their own scholarly – detailed, unbiased – research about the O9A since, for them, anti-fascist propaganda, rumours, and some out-of-context or manufactured or wrongly attributed quotations will usually suffice.

Yet – as our esoteric, Aeonic, ω9α, perspective informs us – the anti-fascist movement of our times, with its Magian ethos, its hypocrites, its righteous believers, its fakers, its hatred and intolerance, will no doubt change, evolve, and in the not too distant future will cease to exist. Just like another modern manifestation of the Magian ethos, the Soviet Union, ceased to exist despite its repression and fabricated abstractions and despite its persecution of those who were, in every-way but name, heretics. Similarly, older manifestations of the Magian ethos such as Judeo-Christianity, changed, evolved, manifested multiple new forms, and has even begun to manifest a certain tolerance as it declines toward its inevitable death about two hundred years from now.

Our esoteric, Aeonic, ω9α, perspective also informs us that, as Rachael Stirling recently wrote:

“In a century, all current anti-O9A propagandists will be dead, just as a government which may have passed some law banning some mythic, phantom, non-existent, group they named as the O9A, will be different, changed, if such governments and such countries as they governed – such causal constructs – will still exist a century from now.

But the presencing of the acausal that is currently known and named as “the O9A”, as “the order of nine angles”, as “the order of the nine angles” will still exist, be it under those denotata or some other denotata, and be it an evolution, by some of those who presence it, of what is now known under such names […]

So we who adhere to, who now represent, the resurgence of the hermetic ancient way to Lapis Philosophicus currently known under such a denotatum as the O9A, smile in our pagan knowing way at the causal machinations and propaganda and lies and polemics of zealous anti-O9A propagandists and their followers.” {15}

TWS Nexion
Oxonia
May 2021 ev
v.1.03

{1} Tore Ahlbäck & Björn Dahla, Western Esotericism, Donner Institute, 2008

{2} Mail on Sunday, 2 January 2021

{3} https://www.thejc.com/news/uk/home-secretary-urged-to-ban-nazi-satanist-group-that-vows-to-combat-jewish-influence-1.50156

{4} https://www.hopenothate.org.uk/2021/04/19/atomwaffen-order-nine-angles/

{5} https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-extremism-slotkin-idUSKBN2BW1KQ

{6} Available at https://wyrdsister.files.wordpress.com/2021/03/the_giving-v1-1.pdf

{7} The Seven Fold Way is described in the chapter The Seven Fold Way Of The Order Of Nine Angles in the 300 page The Seofonfeald Paeth, available at https://wyrdsister.files.wordpress.com/2019/10/o9a-trilogy-print.pdf

{8} The letters are available from (i) https://wyrdsister.files.wordpress.com/2017/07/satanicletters-1.pdf and (ii) https://wyrdsister.files.wordpress.com/2017/07/satanicletters-2.pdf and are primary sources in respect of the O9A.

{9} See for example, the two chapters Authority, Learning, and Culture, In O9A Tradition and The Authority Of Individual Judgement: Interpretation And Meaning in The Seofonfeald Paeth available at https://wyrdsister.files.wordpress.com/2020/03/o9a-trilogy-print.pdf

{10} Affidavit, 4th day of June, 2020, sworn before the Honorable Stewart D. Aaron, Judge, Southern District of New York.

{11} https://wyrdsister.wordpress.com/2021/05/01/a-satanic-belief-system/

{12} https://wyrdsister.wordpress.com/2021/01/05/the-most-dangerous-people-on-planet-earth/

{13} Holocaustianity is a modern belief, an abstraction, where (i) believers insist that the truth of the Holocaust cannot be questioned or doubted, (ii) believers make a solemn promise that they will never forget “Nazi crimes” and what happened in the Holocaust, (iii) believers demand that those who question or doubt the Holocaust should be publicly shamed and punished: lose their livelihood, and be tried as criminals and imprisoned; (iv) believers hold regular public ceremonies where the Holocaust is solemnly remembered; (v) believers seek to have governments, especially in the West, hold regular public ceremonies where the Holocaust is solemnly remembered; (vi) believers demand that their version of the Holocaust be taught to all school-children who should make regular pilgrimages to what they insist are sites where the Holocaust took place.

{14} In regard to modern manifestations of the Magian ethos, see https://omega9alpha.files.wordpress.com/2021/05/magian-manifestations-v3.pdf

{15} https://wyrdsister.wordpress.com/2021/05/12/foreseeing-the-future/

°°°°°°°°°
A pdf version of this article:
The Perception Of The O9A


Modern Journalism And The Left

Posted: April 5th, 2021 | Author: | Filed under: Current Affair, Far-Right, Journalism, Junk Journalism, Leftists, Liberals, Media Attention, Mundanes, News, O9A, O9A Nine Angles, Order of Nine Angles, Order of the Nine Angles, Reports | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Modern Journalism And The Left

 

.:.I agree with Communist Regimes and the German Nazi Regime: Journalists are scum and should simply be executed.

I’m beyond “fascism” when it comes to my personal and private beliefs and opinions of so-called “Journalists.” I’m Khmer. Our old-world social order is based on Brahmanism, meaning that our old-world culture and society is a Feudal society which was/is divided into castes [varna in Sanskrit, Vanna in Pali]. Traditionally, based on our Traditional Feudal views, a Peasant [those of the bottom caste/class] have no legal or social right to be literate. It was illegal, back in the Kingdom for those people to go to school and learn to read and write. I am by upbringing a Feudalist.

There was a reason why such social rules were established. Same reasoning why, relatively “recently” African Slaves in this country were forbidden to learn to read and write. The reasoning is that humans who are ignorant by nature and ethos cause more problems when they can read and write: because they are Stupid by default, and due to a lack of organic high order intelligence, and a lack of reading and articulatory comprehension skills, they will misunderstand what they read. Which is one reason why conspiracy theories are so prevalent amongst the common public.

But those peasants wanted to learn how to read and write. And so they eventually got together and gave birth to the Khmer Rouge: peasant Communists. They fought and killed for their right to read and write. And then what happened? And then, once in Power, they Understood why people shouldn’t be literate. And so, what did the Khmer Rouge do? They murdered every fucking person who were able to read and write, and murdered teachers and educators.

There are two lessons to be learned from the Khmer Rouge: Lesson 1 = We all understand things in the proper time and place. As peasants they did not understand why it was not lawful for them to learn to read and write. When they themselves became a regime, they Understood why. Lesson 2 = Like the old people in my culture say: “You will stumble upon that which you hate.” The peasants hated those of us in the top varna/vanna so much for oppressing them and keeping them illiterate, that they themselves eventually became the Oppressors and they themselves murdered people en masse to keep them illiterate.

The State of Journalism & The Left

I learned about journalism first in Middle School, and then once again in High School. But this was long ago, when journalism was actual journalism: when it was an honorable profession of writers and reporters.

We learned in Middle School that a journalist “reports” stories to people. They write a “story” by answering the Core Questions of: Who, What, Where, When, Why, & How. Data must be collected from people and so on, in order to answer those Core Questions. The Data must be Objective and Unbiased. And so, our teacher gave us assignments where we were ordered to write an article about an event that took place in our neighborhood or in our family.

Interestingly, I failed that assignment, because I was very young and dumb at that time, and so, I did not know what exactly being “Objective,” and “Unbiased” meant. The subject I decided to write a news article about was on a few kids who lived on my block [they were friends of mine] who did drugs. My “journalist” article defended their right to do drugs, and I attacked the DARE program as being incompetent. I ended up being sent to the principle’s office.

And so, I learned back then, that when a journalist interjects their own private views and opinions, that it is not a “news article” proper, because it’s not Objective [as opposed to subjective views and opinions] and Unbiased. An article which is subjective and biased, which incorporates the emotions and views/opinions of the journalist was called an “Editorial” back in those days.

Today, in journalism, there is no difference between a news article, an editorial, a tabloid, and fake news. In the old days, what we today call “fake news” was referred to as “Misinformation.” And back during the era of WW2, “Misinformation” was referred to as “Propaganda.”

The word “Propaganda” – which shares the same root lexeme as the word “Propagate” – is a means or method of Propagating a certain view, sentiment, belief, or opinion, in a given target group. And so, when modern Journalists write their fake news, such fake news are not objective and unbiased stories about current events: they are narratives written to Propagate their own views, sentiments, beliefs, or narratives designed to spread manufactured opinions and sentiments in order to influence readers [i.e.: citizens].

Today, journalism has gone far beyond being shitty fake news manufacturing machines. Their “news articles,” and “reports,” have gone beyond editorials.

Today, journalism has self-promoted itself into tribunals. And every journalist today is a Judge and Prosecutor.

A good example of the current state of Journalism as Prosecuting Tribunals, is the 1990s interview recording involving David Myatt & Nick Lowles. I’ve had about a week to listen to that interview and formulate an opinion.

In the said interview, David Myatt is clearly on the Defense. In that interview, Nick Lowles is not acting or behaving like a Journalist. He [Nick Lowles] is playing the role of a Prosecutor, one who already had a Pre-Meditated, Pre-Fabricated notion/story/theory that David Myatt is behind the ONA, and that because David Myatt is behind the ONA, he [David Myatt] is therefore an evil and awful person. And like a Prosecutor – one who is functioning outside the legal jurisdiction of any known court mind you – Nick Lowles does not ask David Myatt objective and unbiased questions. Instead Nick Lowles tries to actually Prove his case during the entire duration of the so-called “interview.”

I find a few things disgusting and despicable about that so-called “interview”: 1) That Nick Lowles, playing the role of a Prosecutor, acted in the capacity of such outside of a court, and outside of any known and legal judiciary jurisdiction, 2) That Nick Lowles had the audacity to try and Prove his case, without any actual evidence, by asking David Myatt weasel questions and playing amateurish lawyer games, 3) That David Myatt did not have a Lawyer or Attorney by his side, to help Defend him and his side of the story.

Something about the United Kingdom, its government regime stooges, its journalist institutions, and Nick Lowles, disturb me. Here’s what is disturbing to me:

  1. You have Nick Lowles and UK “journalists” for the past few years relentlessly attack the ONA, with these stupid internet gossip they pass as journalist articles. None of which are researched properly, none of which are objective and unbiased.
  2. Every one of those Anti-ONA journalist “articles” fear mongers the public.
  3. At the Hope Not Hate website there is more fear mongering, where that entire website is dedicated to emotively stimulating the Readers into a fearful frenzy.
  4. After the Readers of the said website are sufficiently afraid for their lives, a Button is provided to the fearful Readers to push in order to urge the UK Members of Parliament to ban the ONA.

So the questions those of us who are intelligent should ask are: 1) Did Nick Lowles and those journalists do any research to verify their story/narrative? 2) Do you actually think that the Readers, will do any research to validate the stories and fear mongering they read? And 3) Do you actually think that those members of parliament will do any research to validate and verify why their constituents [the fearful people] are afraid and if the stories they have been reading are valid and factual, and real? The answer to all three of those questions is: NO. That’s why the UK disturbs me: they’ve made a political method out of fear mongering the stupid public in order to make laws that increasingly divest people of their liberties. Mind you, this is the same government regime that bans and outlaws groups for being Right Wing, which are labeled as “terrorists.” Yesteryear the Leftist hate-words were “Communist” and “Socialist.” This era, the hate-words of the Left are “terrorist” and “child molesters.” Which is one reason why, as a Feudalist, I believe that commoners should not be literate, because they simply cause more problems when they read shit.

I’ve noticed that those journalists use a lot of logical fallacies when attacking the ONA. One main fallacy they have been using – they use this fallacy with anything they dislike – is called “Card Stacking.”

Card Stacking, for example is when you have a normal deck of poker cards. In that deck there are red suits and black suits. And so “Card Stacking” is when you show people only the black cards, to make it seem as if there are only black cards.

In real life, Card Stacking is when as racists, we desire to make people believe that African Americans are bad people, and so we say: “Look at all the millions and millions of Black people in prison, blah, blah, they do drugs and gang bang, blah, blah.” That’s Card Stacking. It’s Card Stacking because: what about all the White people in prison? And the Mexicans? And what about all of the millions and millions of descent Black people that are not in prison?

Those journalists Card Stack ONA, by telling internet gossip. What about the 5000 pages of institutional texts written by ONA founder Anton Long? What about all the ONA text that says that ONA is not neo-nazi? And so on?

I understand, because I’m not ignorant, that there was a time when Journalism could afford to be objective and unbiased. This was back in the “hey days” of Journalism. Back when paper-based news papers where still around. Journalism today is going through a crisis.


[making money now from trash liberal/Leftist journalism]

 

It’s the same crisis Radio went through when TV was invented. It’s the same crisis TV and Cable went through when the internet was invented. It’s the same crisis that Playboy Magazine died from.

Playboy Inc, peaked during the mid-2000s, when it even had its own reality show on TV. But when the internet began to be used by everyone, you could just google for free porn. Playboy magazine didn’t know how to work around this crisis and stay relevant to Generation Y & Z. They died and went bankrupt.

Journalism is going through the same crisis: paper-based news papers is dead. You can get news for free on the internet. For the past decade – I’ve been observing for a decade – journalism has been working to transition into an internet based [digital] institution. It’s been a clumsy ordeal for them. Besides working to become digital, Journalism is working very hard to grow a new audience, since Baby-Boomers who read paper-based news papers their entire life, are phasing out [dying of old age].

Therefore, today, in the endeavor to build and create their new audience, all Western Journalist institutions which are carry-overs from paper-based news paper companies, are Leftist Institutions, because the Left is a lucrative market.

Which is why, modern Journalism, tend to have a heavy focus on sensational issues and stories that excite the Left. Such as: people beating up ethnic minorities, cops beating black people, gay hate crimes, State laws that threaten the rights of transexuals, loads and loads of reports about the Right and Far Right, making neo-nazis into the boogieman, etc. You simply follow the fucking money trail. Modern Journalism slangs shitty researched trashy Liberal narratives to their Leftist audience for money. I have absolutely no fucking sympathy or respect for you fucking modern journalists.

There was this one time, long ago, when Journalist news had this thing called “World News,” which was when they would report about current events from around the world. These days, when I watch American news [I’m American] all I see is shit like cops beating up black people, how some tranny kid is crying because he can’t use the girls’ restroom, gay pride parades, how Mexicans are suffering at the border, what Donald Trump ate for breakfast and what he tweeted that day, and facebook shit.

You Become What You Hate

Journalism is today a kangaroo court of courtless Prosecutors and Judges, and the Left is their audience and Jury. The Left and their journalist emotion puppeteers don’t realize it, but they hate “fascists” so much that they have themselves become the “fascists.” Any group or organization that does not agree with their Leftist/Liberal doctrines and ideology gets put through the gauntlet where dozens of fellow journalist Tribunals circulate fear mongering shit about you all day long for years, until the lemming Leftist public act up and push their MPs and Senators to pass laws to save them. It’s called the “Rule of the Mob.” The Mob doesn’t think, it feels emotions. Hence why today Journalism appeals to the emotions of the Left. Hence: fear mongering. Hence: fake news. It’s a flaw in democracy I greatly dislike: when the Demos rules, journalists can influence and control the demos. Thus, those journalists become King Makers in such Mob ruled democracies.

Those of us on the Right, don’t want to oppress anyone’s freedom. Most people on the Far Right are simple traditionalists who are proud of their folk culture and race, and racial history. Most people on the Right are just Christian who see and know that their Christianity is a dying religion in the West, and they’re just trying to speak and struggle to keep it alive. The unfortunate thing about Orthodoxy is that Old Things that can’t adapt to the change of Time and Clime, and environment, become irrelevant and die out.

Today, Journalists and the Left have become the oppressors and fascists. Anything and anyone that contradicts their Leftist and Liberal views and agendas becomes their enemy. Under their Leftist influence, the Freedom to Think and Speak your mind is fast becoming legally uncertain. It’s no longer socially acceptable to think and speak anything [to have opinions] that contradicts the Leftist mob and the Journalist Judges.

I hate Liberals so much, that I have, in a way, become Liberal myself. I believe that every human being, regardless of race, gender, age, nationality, has the natural right to be the human being they desire to be. And if that means that they desire to be Satanists, or Nazis, or Drug addicts, or Trump supporters, or misogynists, or racists, or rapists, or murderers, or homeless, or business owners, stay-at-home mom, cop, politician, or whatever: then that is their human and natural right. So long as we each understand that every action and inaction we commit or withhold generates causal consequences in this causal world: then we are each Free by Nature to be as we each desire to be.

I believe in Fate and Destiny and Dharma: that in this earthly Life, we each, by Fate/Wyrd, become the person we are meant to be. And what consequences in Life we each reap, because of the person we are, are also by acts of Fate and Providence. I don’t believe we have any power over Divine Providence. It would be arrogant to believe so. And so, it’s none of my business or concern really, if Providence has fatefully made a Man a racist hater of Blacks and Asians and Women; or whatever. And so, I see no need to force my personal views and beliefs – political or religious or otherwise – on others. God made us each how we are in life for a reason and purpose. I put my Trust In God, not in man-made ideologies, Left or Right.

/Chloe


A Conversation With Myatt

Posted: March 24th, 2021 | Author: | Filed under: David Myatt, Labyrinthos Mythologicus, Leftists, Media Attention, News, O9A, O9A Nine Angles, Order of Nine Angles, Order of the Nine Angles, Reports, The Sinister Tradition | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on A Conversation With Myatt
panorama ambush

 

[ Originally posted at: https://abglodge.org/blog/post-24/ ]

Many of those interested in the Order of Nine Angles and David Myatt probably had read numerous times, both from the representatives of the Order and from Myatt himself, how allegations about Myatt being Anton Long and being deeply involved with O9A are false. It is one thing to read something like this, but it is completely different experience to actually hear Mr. Myatt refuting these allegations. For all those interested in the subject we are publishing, for the first time, an audio recording of conversation with Myatt regarding ONA and related subjects, and which (conversation) took place sometime during the 90’s. We are sure that at least some of those who will be listening to this recording will be finally convinced that Myatt is not Anton Long. Those who possess even a tiny bit of empathy will be able to sense simple honesty while listening to the gentle voice of this truly honourable man. However, it is obvious that Myatt was to some degree involved with the ONA, at least through the contact with some people belonging to the Order, including (real) Anton Long himself. Also, the ONA at times encouraged such allegations in order to advance Labyrinthos Mythologicus. What is the real truth of the matter is for every individual to assess for themselves. As we already wrote – we are sure that at least some of those who will be listening to this conversation, and who will approach it with open heart, will be convinced of Myatt’s honesty regarding this issue.

This particular conversation was used some decades ago for an article which was supposed to actually reaffirm a speculation that David Myatt is Anton Long and is deeply involved with the O9A. Due to then beliefs  of the author of afore mentioned article the same article was written in a way to support such allegations. And Mr. Myatt gave his best to answer questions asked in most honest and honourable way, giving a lecture along the way on what it means to be an honourable person. We are not to claim how the author of that article was malicious and intentionally was taking things out of context, but simply was blinded by their misapprehension hearing what they want to hear. All of the, recently enhanced, anti-O9A propaganda leading to possible outlawing of the O9A in some countries, is based on similar misapprehensions and pulling things out of context. This is why we think this conversation should be finally published in its full and opportunity should be given to all interested parties to draw conclusions for themselves.

ABG LODGE,
6021 al

 

A Conversation With Myatt (Audio Recording):

SOUNDCLOUD LINK

 

[Gratitude goes out to ABG Lodge for making the recording available.]


An Aeonic Perspective

Posted: March 12th, 2021 | Author: | Filed under: Anarcho-Nihilism, Anarchy, Current Affair, David Myatt, Far-Right, Generation Three, Heretical Texts, Iteration Three, Junk Journalism, Labyrinthos Mythologicus, Leftists, Liberals, Media Attention, National Socialism, Next Generation, Nihilism, O9A, O9A Nine Angles, Order of Nine Angles, Order of the Nine Angles, Phase Three, Reichsfolk, Satanic Heresy, Satanic Polemics, The Sinister Dialectic, The Sinister Game, The Sinister Tradition, The Sinisterly Numinous Tradition, Third Iteration | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on An Aeonic Perspective

 [ Originally posted at: https://wyrdsister.wordpress.com/2021/03/10/an-aeonic-perspective/ ]

°°°°°°°°

odal3

°°°°°°°°°

An Aeonic Perspective
(pdf)

Contents:

1. Countering Anti-Fascist Prejudice
2. Transgression, The O9A, And Infiltrators
3. Appreciating The Philosophy Of Pathei-Mathos
Appendix: An Anarcho-Nihilist Esoteric Philosophy

°°°°°°°

Related:
The Seofonfeald Paeth
(pdf)

°°°°°°°°°