Interview With Jake Hanrahan And ABG Lodge

Posted: April 17th, 2021 | Author: | Filed under: David Myatt, Drecc, Dreccian, Far-Right, Islam, Journalism, Labyrinthos Mythologicus, Leftists, Liberals, Media Attention, Mundanes, National Socialism, O9A, O9A Nine Angles, Occultism, Order of Nine Angles, Order of the Nine Angles, Reports, Satanic Heresy, Satanic Polemics, Sinister Japes, The Sinister Dialectic, The Sinister Game, The Star Game | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Interview With Jake Hanrahan And ABG Lodge

.:.Jake Hanrahan interviews one of the Founders of ABG Lodge about the Order of Nine Angles. I understand that Jake Hanrahan and ABG Lodge will be doing a series of podcast episodes regarding various ONA matters and stuff. The first episode:

I have no opinions about the content of this specific podcast episode. Never trust any person that forms an opinion about things in a matter of seconds or minutes, because such opinions are not intelligent or articulate: such opinions are emotive and born from whimsical emotions and feelings. And we know that emotions are by nature: irrational. It takes time to intelligently formulate an opinion about a given topic, matter, or issue; because one needs to collect data, information, intelligence, figure out the context of things, figure out the underlining motive of all parties involved, figure out who the intended audience is, and so on.

I do believe the ABG Associate answered questions asked of him well and honestly. Such answers may not always be the kind of answers a Questioner may always desire to hear.

Although I don’t personally have any opinions about the content of the interview, I have a small friendly suggestion for Jake Hanrahan:

There is nothing wrong with questioning ONA, nothing wrong with asking an ONA person questions about whatever topic or subject matter. There is also nothing wrong with having negative feelings and opinions about ONA.

But answers to a line of questions become pointless if and when the line of questioning is itself pointless and incoherent.

And so my little friendly suggestion for Jake is that you need to give your body of questions, your line of questioning, some kind of structure and format. Doing a freestyle and formless episode like this may be fun and easy, but it makes things hard for your listener/audience to Follow [per non-sequitur].

For example, there first must exist a desired outcome or an over-all idea that you wish to get across to your audience. You then break down that over-all idea into steps:

Over-all idea = ONA

Therefore: Who, What, When, Where, Why, & How. Thus:

Who: Who founded the ONA? Who is Anton Long? Who is Anton Long said to be? Is David Myatt Anton Long? Who is David Myatt?

What: What is ONA? What makes ONA different [or the same or whatever] from the Church of Satan, the Mormon Church, or whatever… What makes the ONA, the ONA?

When: When did the ONA come into existence?

Where: Where did the ONA come into existence?

Why: Why does the ONA exist? What is its raison d’etre? Why did Anton Long create the ONA?

How: How [in what way] does the ONA exist? How does a person become ONA? How might a person practice ONA?

And then each of those steps can be further, fractally, broken down into the Core Questions:

Who: Who is “Anton Long?” We know that “Anton Long” is a pen-name. To whom does that pen-name belong? Could it belong to David Matt as some journalists and academics say?

What: What evidence, or lack thereof, exists to show or prove that “Anton Long” is whoever people say he is. Is he David Myatt? How do we know that? Is he a professor at some university? How do we know that?

When: When did this “Anton Long” create the ONA? And what exactly do we mean by “create” and “ONA.”

Where: Where does this person using the pen-name “Anton Long” live? Can we obtain such information by the language and vocabulary and spelling that the said person uses?

Why: Why did this person behind the pen-name “Anton Long” create the ONA? What is his motive? What does he desire to accomplish? Does he just simply desire to be a cult leader of his own Satanic thing like Anton LaVey? Did he create ONA as a honey-trap to covert occult oriented people into Neo-Nazis? And for what purpose?

And you can have a different subtopic where you [Jake] would say: “So let’s talk a little about some things that ONA teaches or does… like worship the Devil or be racist nazis.”

You would then use the Core Questions to formulate a body of questions for your person you are asking pertaining to that subtopic. You articulate a coherent line of questioning, in order to derive or obtain an articulate body of answers. Because a properly articulated body of questions and answers produces something that is easy for the listener to also articulate in our/their minds. This is called “Effective Communication,” meaning that you desire, as a Communicator, to Communicate, Convey, a certain idea or concept – biased or unbiashed, objective or unobjective – to a given audience, such that your audience not only understands you but also sympathizes or even agrees with your ideas or concept you are trying to convey: hence the word “Effective.”

Formatting or structuring your line of questions is not for the person you are interviewing, it’s for the sake of your listener, it’s more effective at communicating an idea or concept, and it makes your content sound and feel more professional.

A secret to Effective Communication is that we [the person trying to communicate shit to others] must expend – in ratio – more energy and time into articulating and explaining our thoughts to our audience/listerner/reader, than the energy [brain energy taxes the body’s oxygen and food supply] our audience/listener/reader will put in to process the information we give to them.

And so, in an interview, such as a podcast like this one: Both you and the person being interviewed, must work together in order to expend more energy in articulating and explaining, so that your audience expends less energy to consume the information you are trying to give/convey to them. And a body of questions in a formatted or structured form is how you dance with the person you are interviewing, to work with them.

This is just simply how all biological organisms function on this earth: any organism, if it had to choose between a food resource that is easy to Digest and a food resource that requires a lot of energy to Digest: would choose the easy to Digest food. Fractally: if you are mining for bitcoins, and all of your computers use up more energy in Value than the value of the bitcoins you have mined: then… your bitcoins aren’t worth much, relatively speaking. Now… if you gave away those bitcoins you have mined to people for free: that is Effective Communication. Why? Because those people you gave those bitcoins to did not have to spend much energy mining those bitcoins, and so the ratio of Energy : Gain = Good/Beneficial. Less energy and more Gain = good/beneficial for all and any living organism.

Why does the ONA have an easy time growing and spreading? Because of this same Fractal Biological Principle of the Ratio of Energy:Gain. Anton Long expended 40-50 years in explaining ONA shit in 5000 pages of stuff. Therefore: as a person studying ONA who may be drawn to its Mythos, the energy:gain ratio is beneficial [you don’t have to put in 40 years, Anton Long is giving what he learned to you]. And, biologically speaking, what is beneficial means that not only will you be able to survive but also to Thrive. And so, the secret in Effective Communication is to take the Responsibility to help or cause your audience to Thrive.

It’s a simple Law of Nature that all biological organisms – including us human beings – and superorganisms and systems [such as an ecosystem] function on. Why do Fruit Trees propagate so well? Because Fruit Trees put in an enormous amount of time and energy producing sweet fruits for birds and animals to eat. Therefore the energy:gain ratio for those birds and animals regarding the fruits is “beneficial” meaning: Less Energy in exchange for More calories, sugars, food resource [the birds and animals eat the fruit, and spread its seeds via their poop]. One’s views, morals, opinions, ideas, inventions, religion, ideology function on the same fractal principle of energy:gain ratio. If the ratio = Beneficial, the said things will propagate easily.

And so, a secret to building an audience, for developing influence, for having Effective Communication skills is to simply take the full Responsibility in properly articulating, explaining, and conveying to people your ideas or opinions, so that those people easily understand what exactly you desire for them to understand without them using up their own energy to do so. What you are doing is giving them Free Knowledge without them having to expend their own energy to acquire that knowledge. Just like the bitcoin example, just like how an ecosystem propagates itself. It’s how genes and memes propagate. Less Energy : More Gain = Beneficial; Beneficial = Thrive. That is the formula for spreading ideas and opinions. By that same formula, all kingdoms and empires, all religions, all corporations, and political parties spread and gain adherents/markets. By that same formula, Hitler gained power over Germany: he helped Germany, which was fucked up after WW1, to Thrive. If an idea, ideology, political view/model helps a person or people Thrive, then it will spread, by Law of Nature: all organisms, superorganism [such as nation-states, political parties, ant colonies], and ecosystems, desire to Thrive.

/Chloe

 

 


The Great Rat Panic

Posted: February 14th, 2021 | Author: | Filed under: Anarcho-Nihilism, Anarchy, Current Affair, Far-Right, Generation Three, Iteration Three, Junk Journalism, Leftists, Liberals, News, Next Generation, Nihilism, O9A, O9A Nine Angles, Occultism, Order of Nine Angles, Order of the Nine Angles, Phase Three, Reports, Satanic Heresy, Sinister Japes, The Sinister Dialectic, The Sinister Game, The Sinister Tradition, The Sinisterly Numinous Tradition, Third Iteration | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Great Rat Panic

.:.The simple psychological games the FBI, CIA, MI5, blah blah blah, plays on groups and organizations is simple, but effective, and fun to witness and watch.

It’s a simple technique intelligence services/agencies have been using for decades, since even David Myatt’s time, when he was younger and into the Neo-Nazi scene himself! You just make a few informants, or plant an agent provocateur, sow seeds of distrust and discord: and let Human Nature take care of the rest of the work.

I personally prefer this method on a few counts: 1) Since the group eventually fractures and nobody trusts each other anymore, the group is Neutralized & 2) it saves money, time, and court cases because after such groups have been fractured and neutralized, most of their membership doesn’t get busted. It’s a “friendly” way to break up and neutralize a group or organization.

The funny thing about this technique of neutralizing groups and organizations is that for decades and decades, these X Generation guys are so dumb, that they keep on making the same mistakes over and over again: they keep making groups and organizations and have leaders. They don’t learn!

There are two very easy ways to fix or remedy this problem, which many people of my generations [Y & Z] have learned: 1) don’t have groups or organizations, instead have a decentralized leaderless movement & 2) don’t use lethal violence against others.

The problem with any group, neo-nazi or radical Islamist, which uses lethal violence is that such groups are highly volatile. Volatile meaning that such groups self-destruct very quickly because its members go to prison for lethal violence.

Street gangs are violent. But, there is an important differences between a street gang and a radical Islamist group: a street gang’s raison d’etre is not to use and inflict lethal violence against civilians, whereas a radical Islamist group has as its core doctrine and function [raison d’etre] the use of lethal violence against civilians, hence they’re called “terrorists.” I know of plenty of violent street gangs and skinhead gangs that are very violent [like 18th Street], but they are not labeled and considered as “terrorist” organizations. We all know that mafias are also violent, but I don’t know of any mafia [Italian, Sicilian, Chinese, Russian] which is considered to be a “terrorist” organization. Motorcycle gangs [like the Hell’s Angels] are also violent, but they aren’t labeled by governments as “terrorist” organizations.

A volatile group, does not have the capacity to achieve anything aeonic, because they self-destruct or are neutralized very quickly. It’s actually an oxymoron to believe that anything volatile will last long, even in science: something volatile like nitroglycerine by nature will not last long! It’s a simple fractal principle. And during their brief life-time, they objectively achieve nothing productive. It’s something to think about if you are an o9a initiate who understands that o9a is an aeonic occult movement, with very long-time goals and objectives. Why not follow the example of things that have successfully existed for decades and have continued to grow in membership: mafias, skinhead gangs, street gangs, the KKK, the Catholic Church, religion, cultures? Why continue to make the same mistakes over and over again, decade after decade? Doesn’t being “intelligent” mean that you are smart enough to learn not only from your own mistakes, but from the mistakes of others also? Isn’t the core concept of Evolution: Adaptation?

My favorite antagonist(s) on Star Trek is The Borg. I love them! One cool thing about the Borg is that they are extremely adaptive. You might be able to shoot a phaser gun at them once or twice and destroy one or two, but they will adapt to your phaser very fast! Why? Because their minds are merged into one vast collective hive mind: they are incredibly intelligent! They learn from each other.

Right now, is a bad time for The Proud Boys to be fracturing, because they got dumped by Trump and will be taking his rap. There are many weaknesses with the design of groups and organizations. One weakness is that such groups need internet infrastructure, meaning forums, social networks, websites, etc., in order to find and collect new members. Taking out such a group would be simple work: plant agent provocateurs, use informants, sow seeds of discord, and take away their internet infrastructure.

O9A is different: every human being who has ever been influenced or inspired by o9a can vanish tomorrow, and o9a would still exist: because the o9a is 5000 pages of the “Anton Long” Corpus. All it takes is just one person to read that corpus, initiate themselves, and put its occult traditions into practice, and the o9a is re-born. No infrastructure or structure or leader or group or organization is needed. Mind you now, most of that 5000 pages of stuff is firewall, mythos, stories, a maze of fantasy: created to keep out the Mundanes.

/Chloe

 


O9A: Labyrinthos Mythologicus

Posted: May 30th, 2016 | Author: | Filed under: O9A, Order of Nine Angles, Order of the Nine Angles, Sinister Japes, The Sinister Tradition, The Sinisterly Numinous Tradition | Tags: , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on O9A: Labyrinthos Mythologicus
°°°°°

Order of Nine Angles: Labyrinthos Mythologicus
(pdf)


Modern Satanism and The Order of Nine Angles

Posted: June 18th, 2015 | Author: | Filed under: Heretical Texts, Inner ONA, O9A, Order of Nine Angles, Order of the Nine Angles, Satanic Heresy, Sinister Japes, The Sinister Game, The Sinister Tradition, The Sinisterly Numinous Tradition | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Modern Satanism and The Order of Nine Angles
°°°°°

Modern Satanism And The Order of Nine Angles
(pdf)

Contents

Preface

Part One: Defining Modern Satanism

1. Ontology, Satanism, And The Sinisterly-Numinous Occult Tradition
2. Incitement, Propaganda, and Mythos
3. Beyond The False Dichotomy of LHP and RHP
4. O9A Satanism – A Modern Heresy
5. Satanism Plebeianized
6. Is Satanism Now A Meaningless Term?

Part Two: Selected O9A Texts

7. Notes On The Esoteric Learning Presenced Through Pathei-Mathos
8. An Insider View of The Order of Nine Angles
9. O9A Esotericism – An Initiated Apprehension
10. The Pagan Mysticism of The O9A



O9A – An Insider View

Posted: February 10th, 2015 | Author: | Filed under: Inner ONA, O9A, Order of Nine Angles, Order of the Nine Angles, Sinister Japes, The Sinister Game, The Sinister Tradition, The Sinisterly Numinous Tradition | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on O9A – An Insider View
°°°°°

Order of Nine Angles – An Insider View
(pdf)


Categorizing The Order Of Nine Angles

Posted: July 23rd, 2014 | Author: | Filed under: O9A, Order of Nine Angles, Order of the Nine Angles, Satanic Heresy, Sinister Japes, The Sinister Game, The Sinister Tradition | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Categorizing The Order Of Nine Angles
°°°°°

Categorizing The Order Of Nine Angles
(pdf)

Extract:
Hitherto, the controversial occultism of the Order Of Nine Angles (O9A/ONA) has generally been categorized by academics and others as satanist and/or as Left Hand Path. Thus, the O9A has been described both as representing “a dangerous and extreme form of Satanism” and as presenting “a recognizable new interpretation of Satanism and the Left Hand Path”.

The O9A themselves, as noted by Senholt, have often described themselves as part of what they term the ‘sinister tradition’ and, in the 1980s and 1990s, as ‘traditional satanists’, with Senholt writing that this ‘sinister tradition’ they established makes the O9A “distinct from existing Left Hand Path and satanic groups” but still within the Left Hand Path and satanic milieu. Senholt enumerates seven distinct characteristics of this ‘sinister tradition’, which include anti-ethics, emphasis on physical training, direct action, distinct sinister vocabulary, and a non-Semitic tradition.

Furthermore, both Goodrick-Clarke and Monette note that the O9A also has some pagan elements, with Monette writing that the O9A is “a fascinating blend of both Hermeticism and Traditional Satanism, with some pagan elements.”

However, it is my contention that the O9A should be placed in a new occult category described by the term the sinisterly-numinous tradition, and which tradition is distinct from both the satanic and the Left Hand Path traditions.