Weeding Out Extremism

Posted: April 10th, 2021 | Author: | Filed under: Anarcho-Nihilism, Anarchy, Civil War, Current Affair, Far-Right, Journalism, Leftists, Liberals, National Socialism, News, Nihilism, O9A, O9A Nine Angles, Order of Nine Angles, Order of the Nine Angles, Reports | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Weeding Out Extremism

.:.The US Military is Trying – functioning word is “trying” – to weed out extremism from its ranks. But unlike “some” lawmaker or “some” Department, the US military is doing things the right way: by first trying to define what exactly “extremism” means.

You can’t logically and rationally just throw the word “extremist” around at random people or groups you don’t like. It’s not a medieval Witch Hunt. Just like you cannot simply throw the word “terrorist” around at random people and organizations. According to Legal Thought, terms and words must be properly defined, before such words may be used to accuse, convict, and condemn suspects.

Rhetoric, no matter how passionate and divisive, is just that: Rhetoric, which is protected by the Constitution. Would Fanatic Evangelicals, who use passionate and divisive rhetoric be considered and defined as “extremist?” And if so, would a military person who is a member of such a fanatic evangelical church be punishable? Would a Fanatic Muslim be punishable for being a Radical Islamists: is there a difference? Is a fanatic Muslim a “terrorist” or “extremist?” And would a fanatic Muslim be kicked out of the military for having extreme religious views and feelings?

At least the military [Pentagon] are intelligent about their attempt at weeding out extremism from their ranks: they understand, because of the Oath they took to defend the US Constitution, that they must be careful so as to not violate people’s Constitutional Right to speak and think as well as to assemble and form groups and associations. Unlike “some” lawmaker.

Does an American Citizen have the right to speak and think as they please? Even if such speech and thoughts are unconventional and fanatical, even radical? And do people of similar strong speech and thoughts have the right to assemble and form groups and organizations?

Are those entities listed in that list above actually “terrorist” “organizations?” Or collections of people who have assembled with like minds, who use strong speech and have strong views?

What in the world is Generation Identity and the Order of Nine Angles doing in that list?

The Left is beginning to worry me. Little by little, they take your freedom away. It’s an age old game and technique: Ordo Ab Chao. Order out of chaos. They manufacture the “chaos.” By Fear Mongering the public, until the public is worked up and afraid for their safety. And then they present themselves as the Saviours by passing “necessary” laws to keep the public safe from their manufactured boogiemen and chaos. And in that way, very slowly and imperceptibly, the Left erodes people’s Freedom away.

Rhetoric is now slowly becoming a crime and even a “terrorist” offense. I’m amazed that the Left has not yet deemed the Republican Party to be a “terrorist” organization. There will come a time soon when a White person talking good things about White people will be a criminal offense.

That “White Lives Matter” protest and movement should be interesting [assuming they can make it happen]. I’m waiting to see how butthurt the Left will get. Pay attention to the rhetoric of the Left after that White Lives Matter rally. Those White people will be called things like extremists, and possibly even “terrorists,” and a “threat to America.”

Whereas when massive groups of Black Lives Matter and Antifa run around the streets burning sections of whole cities, burning down police stations: those aren’t “extremists,” or “terrorists.” Certainly not racists, or racialists. They are unhappy Black people and disgruntled Leftists, expressing their anger and dissatisfaction.

Based on what I have seen from the Far Right, I have not thus far seen the Far Right produce the amount of arson, looting, attacks on police stations, and neighborhood businesses, and general mayhem, that the Left has produced.

/Chloe

 

 


White House Pushed To Outlaw ONA

Posted: April 9th, 2021 | Author: | Filed under: Anarcho-Nihilism, Anarchy, Civil War, Current Affair, David Myatt, Far-Right, Journalism, Leftists, Liberals, Media Attention, Michael Aquino, National Socialism, News, Nihilism, O9A, O9A Nine Angles, Occultism, Order of Nine Angles, Order of the Nine Angles, Temple of Set | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on White House Pushed To Outlaw ONA

 

.:.There should be a comma in that list placed after “Order of Nine Angles” and before the word “And.” I’m reminded of a movie I watched long ago about the war between Japan and Russia. At one point, one of the two warring parties is losing the battle. The general of the losing side calls a meeting of shot callers in his army and nation, and the general says to his people: “Gentlemen… there is a time to breath in, and a time to breath out.” Like the Tide ebbs and flows: the Left’s power is Flowing. The Left is pushing the current US Administration/Regime to outlaw the Order of Nine Angles as a “Foreign Terrorist Organization.” The time for the ONA to “breath out” and retreat may be coming.

What is unprecedented is the Left outlawing a philosophy, a Satanic “cult” like the ONA/O9A, which 1) Is not an organization & 2) Is not Neo-Nazi.

But I’m not going to complain about any of this. I honestly think it’s really cool and nice for governments to take ONA seriously. Because for years, since the 70s when Michael Aquino of the Temple of Set was alive, nobody took ONA seriously and nobody even believed the ONA was even real. For the longest time, up until his death, Aquino insisted that David Myatt was the only member of the Order of Nine Angles. And since 2007, every Satanist online, in those forums didn’t even believe the ONA was real or existed.

The Order of Nine Angles is today taken seriously enough to be viewed as a dangerous threat, real enough to warrant being banned and outlawed as a “terrorist,” organization. I will say though that these days, the word “terrorist” is being used in a very liberal way. It seems that anything a political regime doesn’t like these days can be labeled as “terrorists.” Just like in the old days, they threw around the words “Socialist” and “Communist” around at anybody they didn’t like.

I would like to doubt that America will not be as silly as the UK, to ban a philosophy and religious movement such as the Order of Nine Angles. I would like to hope and believe that the US Constitution protects our right to have our own minds, views, thoughts, opinions, beliefs, religion, philosophy, and to speak and express such things, even if such things is not liked or acceptable to Leftist Agendas.

If, my Americanism is wrong, and the Left do end up outlawing the ONA, then ONA will need to go underground, become a genuine Clandestine movement, and recruit the old fashion way: person to person… phone to phone… and ONA will need to utilize Darknet. Anton Long once said that in the future, the outer name “ONA / Order of Nine Angles” may be discarded by some future generation for whatever reason. What he was saying is that the exoteric name/label is unimportant. What is important is the Essence beneath the form/label. I have a nagging suspicion in my solar plexus that soon, the Order of Nine Angle’s will need to discard its exoteric name. It would actually be cooler for ONA to be a nameless Phantom Menace. A nameless global underground Sinister and Occult movement. We can always refer to it as the “Sinister Tradition,” which is another term ONA has been using since its birth.

The Leftist Agenda we are witnessing in this era is a dangerous one for the White Population in general. Where the Left are getting bold enough to outlaw and ban White People from being proud of their own Race and Culture. I’m not White, so I can see this from an outside and objective manner.

In one generation, White People here in America will be a minority Race. The Christianity of White People is dying. The traditional family structure of the White People have been broken down into divorced households, single parent homes, and even broken down into segregated individuals. Divide & Conquer. The Culture of White People is dying. Culture and Traditional Religion is the Glue which bonds and holds a Race together. Without that Glue, a Race or Ethnicity begins to dissipate and defuse.

If you are White, I seriously would suggest that you pay very close attention to how the Chinese Regime is working to destroy Tibetan Civilization, Tibetan Culture, and Tibetan Religion. Because the same strategy and techniques the Regime of China is using against the Tibetan People, is being used by the Left against White People.

Being Proud of your own White Race, and struggling to keep alive your own White Traditions and White Culture is not a crime: it is only a crime to the Left and their Liberal Agendas. Just as it is looking more likely that people can be incriminated for associating with an Occult Philosophy [ONA], in time, if this Agenda continues, it will be a crime for White People to be White. You will not have to go out of your way to commit any crime: the crime will come to you, because the Left will legislate and enact their laws and agendas.

A Civil War in this country is looking more likely in 30-40 years. If the Left will make their laws to outlaw ONA, it will be time for ONA associates to disperse like mushroom spores or viruses, and to implant ourselves inside factions, groups, parties, organizations which will help bring about this Civil War. What is important is that Adversity – the very meaning of Satan is Adversity/Enemy – is the underlying Essence and Force of Evolution itself. And so Adversity is not a bad thing. The Adversity ONA is experiencing is a Satanic Blessing: ONA either Adapts to that Adversity and thus evolves, or it Dies.

The Left do have their Agendas. But there is an unintended consequence to their Agendas of undermining White Culture and White political dominance/hegemony to give such power to ethnic races. Such ethnic races – primarily Blacks and Latinos – do not have the human nature and ethos to run and operate a nation or civilization, hence why they are fleeing and have fled their native nations [which are failed states] and have come here to the West. The unintended consequence of the Left’s Agenda is that America and Europe will become another South Africa, and White People here in America and many parts of Europe will be like Whites in South Africa. History Repeats itself. History is the collective fruit of our collective human actions.

And those Mundanes in Power do not consider Human Nature & Ethos. Races such as Blacks and Latinos and Middle Easterners simply do not have the Nature & Ethos to give birth to and produce a functioning, healthy Nation-State or Civilization. And so, the Left’s ignorance of human nature and ethos, will cause history to repeat. A weak White Race means Strong/Empowered ethnic races: they come to fill in the void and vacuum. The greater context is that China is growing in power on the earth. If the Left have their way, there will be many unintended consequences to their stupid and silly actions: the downfall of the White Race and the downfall of America and its power of influence in the world and on humanity.

Like dominos, when you see the Left outlaw things like ONA and White oriented organizations, you will know the pieces have fallen, and a domino affect will take place: it will be the beginning of the end. And only a Civil War will stop it.

/Chloe


Modern Journalism And The Left

Posted: April 5th, 2021 | Author: | Filed under: Current Affair, Far-Right, Journalism, Junk Journalism, Leftists, Liberals, Media Attention, Mundanes, News, O9A, O9A Nine Angles, Order of Nine Angles, Order of the Nine Angles, Reports | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Modern Journalism And The Left

 

.:.I agree with Communist Regimes and the German Nazi Regime: Journalists are scum and should simply be executed.

I’m beyond “fascism” when it comes to my personal and private beliefs and opinions of so-called “Journalists.” I’m Khmer. Our old-world social order is based on Brahmanism, meaning that our old-world culture and society is a Feudal society which was/is divided into castes [varna in Sanskrit, Vanna in Pali]. Traditionally, based on our Traditional Feudal views, a Peasant [those of the bottom caste/class] have no legal or social right to be literate. It was illegal, back in the Kingdom for those people to go to school and learn to read and write. I am by upbringing a Feudalist.

There was a reason why such social rules were established. Same reasoning why, relatively “recently” African Slaves in this country were forbidden to learn to read and write. The reasoning is that humans who are ignorant by nature and ethos cause more problems when they can read and write: because they are Stupid by default, and due to a lack of organic high order intelligence, and a lack of reading and articulatory comprehension skills, they will misunderstand what they read. Which is one reason why conspiracy theories are so prevalent amongst the common public.

But those peasants wanted to learn how to read and write. And so they eventually got together and gave birth to the Khmer Rouge: peasant Communists. They fought and killed for their right to read and write. And then what happened? And then, once in Power, they Understood why people shouldn’t be literate. And so, what did the Khmer Rouge do? They murdered every fucking person who were able to read and write, and murdered teachers and educators.

There are two lessons to be learned from the Khmer Rouge: Lesson 1 = We all understand things in the proper time and place. As peasants they did not understand why it was not lawful for them to learn to read and write. When they themselves became a regime, they Understood why. Lesson 2 = Like the old people in my culture say: “You will stumble upon that which you hate.” The peasants hated those of us in the top varna/vanna so much for oppressing them and keeping them illiterate, that they themselves eventually became the Oppressors and they themselves murdered people en masse to keep them illiterate.

The State of Journalism & The Left

I learned about journalism first in Middle School, and then once again in High School. But this was long ago, when journalism was actual journalism: when it was an honorable profession of writers and reporters.

We learned in Middle School that a journalist “reports” stories to people. They write a “story” by answering the Core Questions of: Who, What, Where, When, Why, & How. Data must be collected from people and so on, in order to answer those Core Questions. The Data must be Objective and Unbiased. And so, our teacher gave us assignments where we were ordered to write an article about an event that took place in our neighborhood or in our family.

Interestingly, I failed that assignment, because I was very young and dumb at that time, and so, I did not know what exactly being “Objective,” and “Unbiased” meant. The subject I decided to write a news article about was on a few kids who lived on my block [they were friends of mine] who did drugs. My “journalist” article defended their right to do drugs, and I attacked the DARE program as being incompetent. I ended up being sent to the principle’s office.

And so, I learned back then, that when a journalist interjects their own private views and opinions, that it is not a “news article” proper, because it’s not Objective [as opposed to subjective views and opinions] and Unbiased. An article which is subjective and biased, which incorporates the emotions and views/opinions of the journalist was called an “Editorial” back in those days.

Today, in journalism, there is no difference between a news article, an editorial, a tabloid, and fake news. In the old days, what we today call “fake news” was referred to as “Misinformation.” And back during the era of WW2, “Misinformation” was referred to as “Propaganda.”

The word “Propaganda” – which shares the same root lexeme as the word “Propagate” – is a means or method of Propagating a certain view, sentiment, belief, or opinion, in a given target group. And so, when modern Journalists write their fake news, such fake news are not objective and unbiased stories about current events: they are narratives written to Propagate their own views, sentiments, beliefs, or narratives designed to spread manufactured opinions and sentiments in order to influence readers [i.e.: citizens].

Today, journalism has gone far beyond being shitty fake news manufacturing machines. Their “news articles,” and “reports,” have gone beyond editorials.

Today, journalism has self-promoted itself into tribunals. And every journalist today is a Judge and Prosecutor.

A good example of the current state of Journalism as Prosecuting Tribunals, is the 1990s interview recording involving David Myatt & Nick Lowles. I’ve had about a week to listen to that interview and formulate an opinion.

In the said interview, David Myatt is clearly on the Defense. In that interview, Nick Lowles is not acting or behaving like a Journalist. He [Nick Lowles] is playing the role of a Prosecutor, one who already had a Pre-Meditated, Pre-Fabricated notion/story/theory that David Myatt is behind the ONA, and that because David Myatt is behind the ONA, he [David Myatt] is therefore an evil and awful person. And like a Prosecutor – one who is functioning outside the legal jurisdiction of any known court mind you – Nick Lowles does not ask David Myatt objective and unbiased questions. Instead Nick Lowles tries to actually Prove his case during the entire duration of the so-called “interview.”

I find a few things disgusting and despicable about that so-called “interview”: 1) That Nick Lowles, playing the role of a Prosecutor, acted in the capacity of such outside of a court, and outside of any known and legal judiciary jurisdiction, 2) That Nick Lowles had the audacity to try and Prove his case, without any actual evidence, by asking David Myatt weasel questions and playing amateurish lawyer games, 3) That David Myatt did not have a Lawyer or Attorney by his side, to help Defend him and his side of the story.

Something about the United Kingdom, its government regime stooges, its journalist institutions, and Nick Lowles, disturb me. Here’s what is disturbing to me:

  1. You have Nick Lowles and UK “journalists” for the past few years relentlessly attack the ONA, with these stupid internet gossip they pass as journalist articles. None of which are researched properly, none of which are objective and unbiased.
  2. Every one of those Anti-ONA journalist “articles” fear mongers the public.
  3. At the Hope Not Hate website there is more fear mongering, where that entire website is dedicated to emotively stimulating the Readers into a fearful frenzy.
  4. After the Readers of the said website are sufficiently afraid for their lives, a Button is provided to the fearful Readers to push in order to urge the UK Members of Parliament to ban the ONA.

So the questions those of us who are intelligent should ask are: 1) Did Nick Lowles and those journalists do any research to verify their story/narrative? 2) Do you actually think that the Readers, will do any research to validate the stories and fear mongering they read? And 3) Do you actually think that those members of parliament will do any research to validate and verify why their constituents [the fearful people] are afraid and if the stories they have been reading are valid and factual, and real? The answer to all three of those questions is: NO. That’s why the UK disturbs me: they’ve made a political method out of fear mongering the stupid public in order to make laws that increasingly divest people of their liberties. Mind you, this is the same government regime that bans and outlaws groups for being Right Wing, which are labeled as “terrorists.” Yesteryear the Leftist hate-words were “Communist” and “Socialist.” This era, the hate-words of the Left are “terrorist” and “child molesters.” Which is one reason why, as a Feudalist, I believe that commoners should not be literate, because they simply cause more problems when they read shit.

I’ve noticed that those journalists use a lot of logical fallacies when attacking the ONA. One main fallacy they have been using – they use this fallacy with anything they dislike – is called “Card Stacking.”

Card Stacking, for example is when you have a normal deck of poker cards. In that deck there are red suits and black suits. And so “Card Stacking” is when you show people only the black cards, to make it seem as if there are only black cards.

In real life, Card Stacking is when as racists, we desire to make people believe that African Americans are bad people, and so we say: “Look at all the millions and millions of Black people in prison, blah, blah, they do drugs and gang bang, blah, blah.” That’s Card Stacking. It’s Card Stacking because: what about all the White people in prison? And the Mexicans? And what about all of the millions and millions of descent Black people that are not in prison?

Those journalists Card Stack ONA, by telling internet gossip. What about the 5000 pages of institutional texts written by ONA founder Anton Long? What about all the ONA text that says that ONA is not neo-nazi? And so on?

I understand, because I’m not ignorant, that there was a time when Journalism could afford to be objective and unbiased. This was back in the “hey days” of Journalism. Back when paper-based news papers where still around. Journalism today is going through a crisis.


[making money now from trash liberal/Leftist journalism]

 

It’s the same crisis Radio went through when TV was invented. It’s the same crisis TV and Cable went through when the internet was invented. It’s the same crisis that Playboy Magazine died from.

Playboy Inc, peaked during the mid-2000s, when it even had its own reality show on TV. But when the internet began to be used by everyone, you could just google for free porn. Playboy magazine didn’t know how to work around this crisis and stay relevant to Generation Y & Z. They died and went bankrupt.

Journalism is going through the same crisis: paper-based news papers is dead. You can get news for free on the internet. For the past decade – I’ve been observing for a decade – journalism has been working to transition into an internet based [digital] institution. It’s been a clumsy ordeal for them. Besides working to become digital, Journalism is working very hard to grow a new audience, since Baby-Boomers who read paper-based news papers their entire life, are phasing out [dying of old age].

Therefore, today, in the endeavor to build and create their new audience, all Western Journalist institutions which are carry-overs from paper-based news paper companies, are Leftist Institutions, because the Left is a lucrative market.

Which is why, modern Journalism, tend to have a heavy focus on sensational issues and stories that excite the Left. Such as: people beating up ethnic minorities, cops beating black people, gay hate crimes, State laws that threaten the rights of transexuals, loads and loads of reports about the Right and Far Right, making neo-nazis into the boogieman, etc. You simply follow the fucking money trail. Modern Journalism slangs shitty researched trashy Liberal narratives to their Leftist audience for money. I have absolutely no fucking sympathy or respect for you fucking modern journalists.

There was this one time, long ago, when Journalist news had this thing called “World News,” which was when they would report about current events from around the world. These days, when I watch American news [I’m American] all I see is shit like cops beating up black people, how some tranny kid is crying because he can’t use the girls’ restroom, gay pride parades, how Mexicans are suffering at the border, what Donald Trump ate for breakfast and what he tweeted that day, and facebook shit.

You Become What You Hate

Journalism is today a kangaroo court of courtless Prosecutors and Judges, and the Left is their audience and Jury. The Left and their journalist emotion puppeteers don’t realize it, but they hate “fascists” so much that they have themselves become the “fascists.” Any group or organization that does not agree with their Leftist/Liberal doctrines and ideology gets put through the gauntlet where dozens of fellow journalist Tribunals circulate fear mongering shit about you all day long for years, until the lemming Leftist public act up and push their MPs and Senators to pass laws to save them. It’s called the “Rule of the Mob.” The Mob doesn’t think, it feels emotions. Hence why today Journalism appeals to the emotions of the Left. Hence: fear mongering. Hence: fake news. It’s a flaw in democracy I greatly dislike: when the Demos rules, journalists can influence and control the demos. Thus, those journalists become King Makers in such Mob ruled democracies.

Those of us on the Right, don’t want to oppress anyone’s freedom. Most people on the Far Right are simple traditionalists who are proud of their folk culture and race, and racial history. Most people on the Right are just Christian who see and know that their Christianity is a dying religion in the West, and they’re just trying to speak and struggle to keep it alive. The unfortunate thing about Orthodoxy is that Old Things that can’t adapt to the change of Time and Clime, and environment, become irrelevant and die out.

Today, Journalists and the Left have become the oppressors and fascists. Anything and anyone that contradicts their Leftist and Liberal views and agendas becomes their enemy. Under their Leftist influence, the Freedom to Think and Speak your mind is fast becoming legally uncertain. It’s no longer socially acceptable to think and speak anything [to have opinions] that contradicts the Leftist mob and the Journalist Judges.

I hate Liberals so much, that I have, in a way, become Liberal myself. I believe that every human being, regardless of race, gender, age, nationality, has the natural right to be the human being they desire to be. And if that means that they desire to be Satanists, or Nazis, or Drug addicts, or Trump supporters, or misogynists, or racists, or rapists, or murderers, or homeless, or business owners, stay-at-home mom, cop, politician, or whatever: then that is their human and natural right. So long as we each understand that every action and inaction we commit or withhold generates causal consequences in this causal world: then we are each Free by Nature to be as we each desire to be.

I believe in Fate and Destiny and Dharma: that in this earthly Life, we each, by Fate/Wyrd, become the person we are meant to be. And what consequences in Life we each reap, because of the person we are, are also by acts of Fate and Providence. I don’t believe we have any power over Divine Providence. It would be arrogant to believe so. And so, it’s none of my business or concern really, if Providence has fatefully made a Man a racist hater of Blacks and Asians and Women; or whatever. And so, I see no need to force my personal views and beliefs – political or religious or otherwise – on others. God made us each how we are in life for a reason and purpose. I put my Trust In God, not in man-made ideologies, Left or Right.

/Chloe


Remastered David Myatt Interview

Posted: March 26th, 2021 | Author: | Filed under: David Myatt, Far-Right, Junk Journalism, Labyrinthos Mythologicus, Leftists, Liberals, Media Attention, Michael Aquino, National Socialism, News, O9A, O9A Nine Angles, Order of Nine Angles, Order of the Nine Angles, Reichsfolk, The Sinister Tradition, The Sinisterly Numinous Tradition | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Remastered David Myatt Interview

 

Nameless Therein remastered the recently released 1990s David Myatt Interview, removing the background noise. The audio quality sounds a lot better now. You can clearly hear both Nick Lowles and DM’s voices.

Don’t let DM’s soft spoken voice fool you. Interestingly, most totalitarian dictators are highly intellectual with very soft spoken voices. Consider the voice of Pol Pot, Mao Tze Tung, that Kim guy from North Korea, and the various dictators of South America; etc. Most of us are use to equating dictator and strong men with Hitler and his screaming voice. That loud, screaming voice of Hitler’s is his public speaking voice and Public Persona: it is not his everyday speaking voice and everyday casual persona. An important element in manifesting Charisma is the ability to craft and finetune a Persona and lexical inventory specific to your Target Market. This is something DM can be seen to be able to do as well: consider his look, persona, and lexical inventory when he was a Neo-Nazi with when he was a Muslim.

There is a saying on the streets that goes: “It’s always the quiet ones.” That saying goes with another saying that goes: “A dog that barks loud doesn’t bite very hard.” Like Snoop Dog said in “G Thang”: “Your bark was loud but your bite wasn’t vicious…” It’s the quiet ones like DM, one who is not loud, who speaks softly, almost like a mouse, almost timid and shy: that can be very dangerous [as well as being very sly and coy], especially when they snap. I had always wanted to hear DM’s voice to discern what type of person he was/is. I had my suspicions. Thanks to this interview recording, I now know the sound and quality of his words.

The remastered version is here: SOUNDCLOUD LINK

Both versions are originally posted at ABG’s website: https://abglodge.org/blog/post-24/

That picture of DM has become my second favourite picture of him. It’s a very nice one. I wonder where he was going before he got ambushed?

Gratitude goes out to Nameless Therein; thanks!

/Chloe

 


A Conversation With Myatt

Posted: March 24th, 2021 | Author: | Filed under: David Myatt, Labyrinthos Mythologicus, Leftists, Media Attention, News, O9A, O9A Nine Angles, Order of Nine Angles, Order of the Nine Angles, Reports, The Sinister Tradition | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on A Conversation With Myatt
panorama ambush

 

[ Originally posted at: https://abglodge.org/blog/post-24/ ]

Many of those interested in the Order of Nine Angles and David Myatt probably had read numerous times, both from the representatives of the Order and from Myatt himself, how allegations about Myatt being Anton Long and being deeply involved with O9A are false. It is one thing to read something like this, but it is completely different experience to actually hear Mr. Myatt refuting these allegations. For all those interested in the subject we are publishing, for the first time, an audio recording of conversation with Myatt regarding ONA and related subjects, and which (conversation) took place sometime during the 90’s. We are sure that at least some of those who will be listening to this recording will be finally convinced that Myatt is not Anton Long. Those who possess even a tiny bit of empathy will be able to sense simple honesty while listening to the gentle voice of this truly honourable man. However, it is obvious that Myatt was to some degree involved with the ONA, at least through the contact with some people belonging to the Order, including (real) Anton Long himself. Also, the ONA at times encouraged such allegations in order to advance Labyrinthos Mythologicus. What is the real truth of the matter is for every individual to assess for themselves. As we already wrote – we are sure that at least some of those who will be listening to this conversation, and who will approach it with open heart, will be convinced of Myatt’s honesty regarding this issue.

This particular conversation was used some decades ago for an article which was supposed to actually reaffirm a speculation that David Myatt is Anton Long and is deeply involved with the O9A. Due to then beliefs  of the author of afore mentioned article the same article was written in a way to support such allegations. And Mr. Myatt gave his best to answer questions asked in most honest and honourable way, giving a lecture along the way on what it means to be an honourable person. We are not to claim how the author of that article was malicious and intentionally was taking things out of context, but simply was blinded by their misapprehension hearing what they want to hear. All of the, recently enhanced, anti-O9A propaganda leading to possible outlawing of the O9A in some countries, is based on similar misapprehensions and pulling things out of context. This is why we think this conversation should be finally published in its full and opportunity should be given to all interested parties to draw conclusions for themselves.

ABG LODGE,
6021 al

 

A Conversation With Myatt (Audio Recording):

SOUNDCLOUD LINK

 

[Gratitude goes out to ABG Lodge for making the recording available.]


Notes On The Far-Right In Europe

Posted: February 16th, 2021 | Author: | Filed under: Anarcho-Nihilism, Anarchy, Current Affair, Far-Right, Generation Three, Iteration Three, Leftists, Liberals, News, Next Generation, O9A, O9A Nine Angles, Occultism, Order of Nine Angles, Order of the Nine Angles, Phase Three, The Sinister Dialectic, Third Iteration | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Notes On The Far-Right In Europe

.:.If some kind of data or information needs to be brought to my attention for whatever reason, Providence and/or the Library Angel somehow gets such data into my face.

Hope Not Hate has published a Report about the Far-Right in Europe, which includes data on the Pandemic and its effects on said Far-Right groups, as well as country-to-country statistics on Right Wing groups. I love statistics: they help you think and formulate ideas. The Report can be obtained here: Report Launch: State of Hate: Far Right Extremism In Europe 2021.

There was one part of that Report which should be highlighted and considered carefully:

 

Two main factors are primarily responsible for the evolution or transition of groups/organizations into movements and transnational movements: 1) the aging and fading out of Baby-Boomers and Generation X from the social and national spheres of influence and the rise of Generations Y & Z to take the helm of social and national influence & 2) the internet and the “shrinking world” effect the internet has on us, where familiarity with others develops online and where information travels instantly.

Therefore, because of those two factors, HnH is correct in saying that we live in a Post-Organizational world. This is a concept that most Baby-Boomers and X Gen just simply don’t understand. This is a good thing and a bad thing: bad for them because such older generations of people have brains that are working with 1980s and 1990s Mind-software, where they can’t help but always think in terms of Groups, Organizations, Structure, Leaders. Good for the evolving Far-Right because such Baby-Boomers and X Gen people who dislike such Far-Right movements, due to their old thinking, have no understanding or means to counteract the growth of such Far-Right movements and transnational movement: how do you stop something which you simply don’t understand? A movement is not like a group: there is nothing there to ban, there are no leaders to work on removing, it’s not centralized where you can implant agents to sow seeds of discord to break up: because it’s already broken up.

Furthermore, these Baby-Boomers and X Gens don’t understand how to use the internet. There was a time, when those stupid X Gen Satanists laughed at o9a people for utilizing the internet to spread o9a, where o9a people back then created massive amounts of WordPress blogs, PDF texts to pass around and circulate. And back then, those stupid X Gens said that because o9a was an “internet phenomenon” that it was fake and their Satanic organizations were real. That way of seeing things is the exact same line of reason that someone born and raised in the age of Radio would say [talk shit about] people who used Television to broadcast their views, opinions, ideologies, and so on: it’s silly and stupid. Why so? Because Radio became outdated, and during the peak of Television [and cable networks] Politicians fought each other for air time on TV networks, and the bulk of a nations propaganda used TV, because TV reached a huge audience/population.

A decade later, and the Left, the Baby-Boomers, and X Gens are literally crying about and afraid of the growth and rise of the Far-Right. How did the Far-Right grow and expand so quickly to be cried about and afraid of? Simple: by having a massive presence on the internet and using the internet to propagate their memeplex! And so whose fucking fault is it that the Far-Right is growing and has been growing at such alarming rates? It’s your fucking fault! And so, as a stupid Baby-Boomer and X Gen person who has no understanding of the internet, no understanding of how Y & Z Gen uses the internet, who doesn’t take the internet serious: how do you counteract and stop the growth of Far-Right movements?

You guys are stupid enough to not understand or take the world wide web serious. Like how Radio Generation people laughed at Television. Here’s a prediction for you dummies from that old generation: in 25 years the Internet will be King Maker. The internet will make and give power to politicians, forge political alliances, politicians will be fighting each other for face-time on the internet to reach huge audiences, political platforms will be passed around the internet, the internet will be the main nexus of collecting new members for political parties, the internet will be the main means of collecting financial support for your political endeavors. Mark my fucking words!

The world wide web is Pandora’s Box. Some stupid person opened that Box a long time ago: and now there’s no turning back. The Internet will fuck up the world order that those post-WW2 Baby-boomers and their X Gen retard kids have built and created. We saw the power of the internet last decade, when the “Arab Springs” revolutions took place: they were movements of young people [of our generation] who used the internet [facebook and so on] to organize riots, revolts, uprisings, protests, and collect social and sentimental support. Much of the coming World War 3 will be fought in ciberspace by state hackers working for governments. The last decade gave us a clew/clue, an intimation, of things to come. And this decade will be the beginning of the end of the World Order that Baby-boomers and X Gens have worked to built. And the world wide web [ciberspace] will play a central part in the death and destruction of their world order. There’s no going back. Those people, governments, agencies, and groups and movements who are savvy with the internet, from hereon, will have the most influence in how the world will change.

The Future Of Politics

HnH’s Report provided statistics for Far-Right groups in each European Nation, how many are active, how many internet vectors each has, how many followers each has, and how many seats – if any – each has in their respective national governments. Although the numbers are better than the last decade, I found the current numbers to be unsatisfying and in want, as well as inefficient. There is an ineffectiveness to how the Far-Right groups are doing things. Things can be Opimalized.

The fundamental behaviour of political groups [left or right] is Fractal in Principle: Competition. All things – plants, insects, animals, religions, ideologies, nations – compete. It’s a core element of evolution and incremental permutation. Therefore, political parties in Europe [and anywhere] compete with each other. And so, the way the Far-Right is competing with the “traditional” political parties is ineffective. By “traditional” political parties, I mean to say political parties that are groups, organizations, with leaders, which have been around for decades and have had many seats in governments.

In order for the Far-Right to effectively compete with the said traditional political parties, it will have to fully embrace the concept of a movement to the full extent. Movements are the future, and the internet is the means of growing and expanding movements.

Therefore, a more Optimal way for the Far-Right movements to compete in Europe first is to eventually establish a kind of umbrella entity that takes on the form of a political party. This umbrella entity would be a pan-European conglomeration / alliance of all Right-Oriented movements, loosely conglomerated together to Focus and Concentrate their effort, time, people, votes, money, etc towards several individuals chosen to be political members of said umbrella entity. The inefficiency is that you have a huge mess of many Far-Right little groups and movements who are competing with big, established traditional political parties. The Principle [law of nature] in play is: Coherency overpowers Incoherency. A huge mess of many Far-Right groups and movements is incoherent and is in principle: powerless.

A second thing the Far-Right would need to understand and work with is a concept called “Propinquity.” Power and Domination actually transcends ideology, doctrines, sentiments, race, and views. Because the idea of “power” and “domination” are reific nouns. Reific, meaning Reification, which is when you treat something to be concrete when it is not. Power is an abstract noun which you can’t touch or poke. When we say “power” what we in actuality mean is: People in a Coherent condition, where they are coherent enough to express and actualize their Will to affect change. Affect and change a people, nation, civilization, society, etc.

Propinquity is the idea that Familiarity is born from Proximity, be that proximity physical or psychological. For example, when two people live in the same apartment/flat complex, such two people are said to be in “propinquity” with one another. When people attend the same church, such people share a propinquity with each other. Two Chinese men, share a propinquitous rapport and connection with each other: their common racial/national background. Ideas/memes travel faster via propinquity. In the very same sense that a virus is more contagious in a group of people who are close in proximity to each other. A meme is a mind virus and thus, follows the same principle of viral transmission and contagiousness.

And so, things such as far-right ideology, racialism, identity based on race, conservative or liberal views, economic views, etc, are all actually a means a group of human beings use in order to establish propinquity. The propinquity itself, is what creates Coherence/Coherency.

In the old days, such things as Traditional Religion, Traditional Families, Traditional Culture were the powerful means of manifesting propinquity in a people, in any given nation. After WW2, the Left worked to dismantle and destroy that Traditionalism, which is why I personally dislike the Left: Divide & Conquer. You get rid of the means of said propinquity, and the people have no more social glue to hold them together, and thus, a coherent government and corporations can then overpower them.

And so, what the Far-Right needs to try to understand is that it is Power that is desired, Power to make policies in a given nation. And therefore, in order to compete with other political groups/parties, effective means of propinquity must be used, that are inclusive enough to establish a pan-European alliance of all Far-Right groups in Europe, in order to manifest Coherence, Focus, and Concentration of effort/money/influence/etc.

In that regard, the use of terrorism, which is to say: the use of lethal violence against fellow Europeans and civilians, as well as government people, is an ineffective means of propinquity, because it ultimately causes your group or movement to become volatile. A volatile movement or group simply does not last long enough to produce any lasting change in a nation or civilization. Your Far-Right movements, if such is desired to last long enough to grow and gain Power, must not be volatile and self-destructive, which is common sense actually. This was a mistake that Hitler made. His government did not nurture National Socialism in the people, across generations: it was too martial, and thus, too volatile, and self-destructed in circa 12 years.

Martial Force, belongs to the military and militias. Once you have gained Power in a country: then it becomes perfectly legal to use Martial Force. All current governments use Martial Force legally: America dropped two atom bombs on Japan, killing over 100,000 innocent civilian lives. Stalin and Mao, once in Power, used Martial Force legally to slaughter millions and millions of people. Once you gain Power, then you can use Martial Force against your perceived enemies legally and without restraint.

Despite the West’s glorification of violence in movies and video games, violence is actually not what gives you Power. Violence is simply a means to get rid of the people and groups of people who have vested interest in a given nation who are unwilling to give up their vested interests. For example, the American Revolution was when a bunch of colonialists, turned rebels, made war with their British Government. In our modern terminology, we’d classify such rebels as “terrorists.” The terrorism of the American colonialists did not give birth to America and did not give them power. What gave those historical rebels power were ideas, ideals, visions of a better nation, and propinquitous elements that collected those colonialists into a coherent social order. The same goes with Stalin and Mao. What gave birth to their Power were ideas, ideals, and propinquitous elements that collected the incoherent proletarian [farmers and workers] into a coherent social order. Power is not martial force: it is Coherency. This is a simple fractal pattern and principle that can been seen anywhere in nature: army ants do not dominate the forest because of martial force [violence] it’s because said army ants are incredibly coherent.

You shouldn’t use Radical Islam as a model, because, what is happening to Islam is very different, than politics and the endeavour to gain Power. The case of Islam is that, it is a dying religion. Why is it dying? Simple: generational transition. The Baby-boomers and X Gen of Islamic Countries are the ones that are religious and hold onto power. They are growing old and will dies soon of old age. The new generations of Y & Z in such Islamic countries are not sectarian, do not want to live under theocratic tyranny and oppression. Thus, because of that generational transition, Islam, in that civilization is dying. And in the dying and decline and death-throws of Islam, it becomes volatile, agitated, aggressive, and violent, as a means to try and struggle to live longer, to force itself onto the next generation, and to try and force itself into new markets [new potential adherents]. You should not use the tactics of a dying theocratic religion as a way and means to give birth to something in Europe. Dying and Birthing are two entirely different things in the cycle of life. And all things, including civilization and religion, have cycles of life and death.

The internet will be King Maker. Power is Coherency. Propinquity generates coherence. The internet is a very effective medium of manifesting that propinquity. The groups, people, and movements that become savvy with the internet, will dominate and influence the future.

/Chloe


The Great Rat Panic

Posted: February 14th, 2021 | Author: | Filed under: Anarcho-Nihilism, Anarchy, Current Affair, Far-Right, Generation Three, Iteration Three, Junk Journalism, Leftists, Liberals, News, Next Generation, Nihilism, O9A, O9A Nine Angles, Occultism, Order of Nine Angles, Order of the Nine Angles, Phase Three, Reports, Satanic Heresy, Sinister Japes, The Sinister Dialectic, The Sinister Game, The Sinister Tradition, The Sinisterly Numinous Tradition, Third Iteration | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Great Rat Panic

.:.The simple psychological games the FBI, CIA, MI5, blah blah blah, plays on groups and organizations is simple, but effective, and fun to witness and watch.

It’s a simple technique intelligence services/agencies have been using for decades, since even David Myatt’s time, when he was younger and into the Neo-Nazi scene himself! You just make a few informants, or plant an agent provocateur, sow seeds of distrust and discord: and let Human Nature take care of the rest of the work.

I personally prefer this method on a few counts: 1) Since the group eventually fractures and nobody trusts each other anymore, the group is Neutralized & 2) it saves money, time, and court cases because after such groups have been fractured and neutralized, most of their membership doesn’t get busted. It’s a “friendly” way to break up and neutralize a group or organization.

The funny thing about this technique of neutralizing groups and organizations is that for decades and decades, these X Generation guys are so dumb, that they keep on making the same mistakes over and over again: they keep making groups and organizations and have leaders. They don’t learn!

There are two very easy ways to fix or remedy this problem, which many people of my generations [Y & Z] have learned: 1) don’t have groups or organizations, instead have a decentralized leaderless movement & 2) don’t use lethal violence against others.

The problem with any group, neo-nazi or radical Islamist, which uses lethal violence is that such groups are highly volatile. Volatile meaning that such groups self-destruct very quickly because its members go to prison for lethal violence.

Street gangs are violent. But, there is an important differences between a street gang and a radical Islamist group: a street gang’s raison d’etre is not to use and inflict lethal violence against civilians, whereas a radical Islamist group has as its core doctrine and function [raison d’etre] the use of lethal violence against civilians, hence they’re called “terrorists.” I know of plenty of violent street gangs and skinhead gangs that are very violent [like 18th Street], but they are not labeled and considered as “terrorist” organizations. We all know that mafias are also violent, but I don’t know of any mafia [Italian, Sicilian, Chinese, Russian] which is considered to be a “terrorist” organization. Motorcycle gangs [like the Hell’s Angels] are also violent, but they aren’t labeled by governments as “terrorist” organizations.

A volatile group, does not have the capacity to achieve anything aeonic, because they self-destruct or are neutralized very quickly. It’s actually an oxymoron to believe that anything volatile will last long, even in science: something volatile like nitroglycerine by nature will not last long! It’s a simple fractal principle. And during their brief life-time, they objectively achieve nothing productive. It’s something to think about if you are an o9a initiate who understands that o9a is an aeonic occult movement, with very long-time goals and objectives. Why not follow the example of things that have successfully existed for decades and have continued to grow in membership: mafias, skinhead gangs, street gangs, the KKK, the Catholic Church, religion, cultures? Why continue to make the same mistakes over and over again, decade after decade? Doesn’t being “intelligent” mean that you are smart enough to learn not only from your own mistakes, but from the mistakes of others also? Isn’t the core concept of Evolution: Adaptation?

My favorite antagonist(s) on Star Trek is The Borg. I love them! One cool thing about the Borg is that they are extremely adaptive. You might be able to shoot a phaser gun at them once or twice and destroy one or two, but they will adapt to your phaser very fast! Why? Because their minds are merged into one vast collective hive mind: they are incredibly intelligent! They learn from each other.

Right now, is a bad time for The Proud Boys to be fracturing, because they got dumped by Trump and will be taking his rap. There are many weaknesses with the design of groups and organizations. One weakness is that such groups need internet infrastructure, meaning forums, social networks, websites, etc., in order to find and collect new members. Taking out such a group would be simple work: plant agent provocateurs, use informants, sow seeds of discord, and take away their internet infrastructure.

O9A is different: every human being who has ever been influenced or inspired by o9a can vanish tomorrow, and o9a would still exist: because the o9a is 5000 pages of the “Anton Long” Corpus. All it takes is just one person to read that corpus, initiate themselves, and put its occult traditions into practice, and the o9a is re-born. No infrastructure or structure or leader or group or organization is needed. Mind you now, most of that 5000 pages of stuff is firewall, mythos, stories, a maze of fantasy: created to keep out the Mundanes.

/Chloe

 


Trump Acquitted

Posted: February 13th, 2021 | Author: | Filed under: News | Tags: | Comments Off on Trump Acquitted

.:.Former President Trump has just been Acquitted by the Senate! I thought Mr. Van Der Veen’s closing statements were on point to reason and doctrine. God I hate the Left, and those Democratic Managers: what a bunch of intellectually dishonest power whore cons.

Now that Trump has been acquitted and not guilty/convicted of inciting “insurrection,” the Left and their Journalist fake-news propaganda machine will be looking for blood from the Right! During the next few weeks, we’ll see the Left and its power take their thirst for blood on The Proud Boys.

/Chloe

 


Trump Trial Final Round

Posted: February 12th, 2021 | Author: | Filed under: News | Tags: | Comments Off on Trump Trial Final Round

.:.Regading the Democrat’s entire case: “Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus.”

Excellent work! The Trump Team put forth their defense in circa 3 hours! What a brilliant show! My favorite Trump Lawyer was Mr. Van Der Veen, who I thought was a great thinker. I loved the look of distaste and contempt he had for the Democratic Team. There were times when Mr. Van Der Veen took his glasses off to look at the Democratic Team to emphasize his condescending contempt.

The best part about Mr. Van Der Veen’s defense was that, in contrast to the entire case of the Democratic Team’s case, Mr. Van Der Veen use Logic, Reason, and Doctrinal Text. Doctrinal Text here meaning texts such as those from the US Constitution and text from court trials clarifying laws and precedents.

My favorite point in Van Der Veen’s defense was when he cited the Brandenburg case, which clarifies the difference between the Free Speech we all enjoy which is protected by the US Constitution and what exactly is “incitement speech.” The Brandenburg case has three holdings/criteria which must be met in order for a statement – spoken or written or otherwise – to qualify as “incitement speech,” where “incitement speech” here means speech used to incite unlawful acts, crimes, and so on. The three holdings/criteria of incitement speech:

Mr. Van Der Veen showed that Trump talks and verbal expressions and the words he used was not incitement speech, made to incite the protesters to become violent. Van Der Veen made sure to also place emphasis upon the word “imminent” per the third criteria. This is very important regarding the chronology of the events of Jan 6th: there was already a crowd of protesters at Capitol Hill, becoming aggressive and violent a full one hour before Trump even came out to make his speech that day.

The Trump Lawyers also showed that Trump, even as president, does still have his freedom of public speech protected under the First Amendment, which the Democratic Team denied. Therefore, we learn that the US Constitution protects everyone’s freedom to speak their views, opinions, beliefs, feelings, conscience, etc – social, political, or otherwise – regardless of how passionate, radical, unconventional, inflammatory, or hateful, such speech or text may be; even if your speech and beliefs regard the destruction of the government.

The Trump Team also showed that a certain section of the protesters that day of Jan 6th had planned some kind of violent attack on Capitol Hill independent of any incitement on Trump’s part.

All-in-all, the Trump Lawyers did exactly as I had thought/predicted they would do. I’m very pleased with their defense. It was a pleasant contrast to the Democrat’s case where the Democrat’s case was 90% silly Appeal to Emotions and trump’s words taken out of context. Whereas the Trump Team used doctrinal texts, past precedents, logic, and reason.

My predictions:

  1. Trump will be acquitted. And if he runs again in 4 years, he may just win.
  2. A group will take the rap for the protest at Capitol Hill.
  3. When the Leftist Journalists and Leftist Media learn that they will not get their desired Trump sacrifice, they will focus their attention on a scapegoat:
  4. Therefore, the Left and the media will most likely turn their wrath on The Proud Boys, who will be the group that takes the rap.
  5. Thus, more fake-news/propaganda against the Right will be coming soon.

And so, o9a should be prepared to get sucked into the Leftist media’s wrath again. Thus, if you are Right leaning, or if you are an associated with o9a in anyway, I highly suggest that you watch the three hours of Trump’s Lawyers talk their case and points, regarding Free Speech, your rights, your right to say and write what you want, regardless of whether such things you express are passionate, radical, unconventional, racist, violent, deranged, malicious, etc.

Watching this Senate Trial has taught me two valuable things: 1) That I really do hate the Left & 2) I now understand my Constitutional Rights.

/Chloe

 

 


Trump Trial Round 2

Posted: February 11th, 2021 | Author: | Filed under: News | Tags: | Comments Off on Trump Trial Round 2

.:.So “round 2” of the Senate Trial is when the Democratic Team goes on the offense and actually present their case. Round 2 took two days, yesterday and today. I found both days to be very interesting. I really enjoy watching people formulate a thought process and trying to use their thought process to try and convince an audience to see things their way.

So, the case the Democratic Team is making, which is to say the story or narrative or quilt work or patchwork, they are putting together is when the Democratic Lawyers take tweets that Trump wrote and juxtaposed said tweets to videos of the so-called “insurrection,” and as they juxtapose the Trump tweets in chronological order with the video of the days and hours leading up to Jan 6th and the moments during the so-called insurrection, said Team proceeds to narrate, which is to say to tell their audience their stitch work version of the story.

The essential argument of the Democrat’s case is that Trump incited an “attack” or “insurrection” against Capitol Hill. As such, the Democratic Team, being on the offensive, is playing the role of the Prosecution. And so, as the Prosecution, it is their job and duty to show beyond a shadow of a doubt that the suspect had the Criminal Intent to perpetrate the alleged unlawful act or crime. In Trump’s case, the Prosecution must prove beyond any doubt that Trump indeed had the intent/intention of creating an actual insurrection against the government of the United States, or they have no real criminal case. The presence of intent is important. Regarding the importance of intent, the following article should be read carefully, in order to understand Legal Thought Processes:

And so, we see in the case of Dominic Pezzola of The Proud Boys, that his actions that day of Jan 6th at Capitol Hill was not manifested [committed] because of “criminal intent” but out of “Conscience.” Therefore, the note to be taken into consideration is that one’s Conscience, and the actions and behaviour one does and commits, out of one’s Conscience, be such conscience warped and misguided as such may be, does not constitute criminal intent, meaning the actual, willful, intention of committing a crime of some sort.

Therefore, the Prosecution must prove that Trump had the actual intention/intent to do what they narrated he was doing. My assessment, after watching their two-day argument and case presentation was that the Democratic Lawyers spent very little time and effort trying to prove and show that Trump had the criminal intent to manifest an insurrection. In two days, consisting of hours and hours of talking and video sharing, the Democratic Lawyers, barely brought up intention/intent.

Instead the Democratic Lawyers spend 12 hours a day, stitching together a flimsy story, a literal story mind you, where their case was like as if they were showing videos and slide shows to grade schoolers. The Democratic Team’s case was literally: “This was what Donald Trump wrote in a Tweet and now watch this video… his tweet and the actions of the insurrectionists are clearly connected!” That’s their narrative, literally for the past 24 hours to trial sessions.

My first contention is with the Democratic Team’s insistent use of the weasel word “insurrection” to describe the large group of people that stormed Capitol Hill:

An “insurrection” by definition is when a person or group of people use force and violence against an authority or government. And so, by definition, those people who stormed Capitol Hill were not “insurrectionists.” Why not? Because the “government” of the United States is an entity composed of three branches, and the “government” of the US does not live in the Capitol Hill building. Trump, when he was president, along with his cabinet constituted a third of what is the US Government, and the Supreme Court is the other third part of the same said Government, and Congress is the other third part.

The people who stormed Capitol Hill, did not use force against the president and his cabinet, nor against the Supreme Court, or even against members of Congress. They didn’t even use force against the police of the Capitol Hill building. When a few Capitol Police held a few of the Protesters on the ground at gun point, you can see hundreds of other Protesters simple walk by and do nothing against those police officers to even free their fellow Protesters.

Objectively speaking, those people who stormed Capitol Hill were simply Protesters, whose emotions were stoked and hyped up, who acted on their emotive beliefs and emotionally driven Conscience and they took their Protest down to Capitol Hill and into the building. If anything, their presence in the said building was unlawful, because they did not have a permit to conduct their protest in the Capitol Hill building.

The Republican Lawyers can easily tackle the Democrat’s shabby narrative [their case] by dividing the Democrat’s case into two halves: 1) What Trump said or tweeted/wrote & 2) What the Protesters did.

Once the case is divided in half, the Republican Lawyers can then attack the two halves separately. First by using the First Amendment to show that Trump has the right, just like any American to say what he wants or write what he wants, and that just because Trump says things that are disagreeable, strong opinionated, etc, does not mean that he speaks and writes such things with the actual intent to produce an insurrection or a coup. Secondly, the Republican Lawyers can work to show that the people that stormed Capitol Hill were not insurrectionists by definition, but merely angry Protestors, who unlawfully took their protest into a building they should not have been inside of. Thirdly, the Republican Team needs to show that the Protesters, and that’s all they were, were not at Capitol Hill for a planned insurrection, but they were there because of misunderstandings and misguided Conscience. And fourthly, the Republicans Teams needs to divorce Trump and the Protestors apart from each other, meaning that they will have to work to show that what the Protesters did was of their own free will and accord, that what they did was born from heated emotions, and not actually because Trump instructed and controlled them.

I personally found the Democrat’s Case presentation, by all of its Lawyers to be barfy [meaning makes you want to vomit]. Their case was so dumb and melodramatic and theatrical, it made you want to puke. It was also hypocritical, because they would spend long moments talking about how the Cops at Capitol Hill suffered so much from the evil insurrectionists… but yet, last year, factions in the Left-Democratic Party stoked and encouraged the BLM and Antifa protests, which resulted in not only vast/mass assault against cops, but police station were also actually burned down! 90% of their case was a fallacious appeal to emotions. The Democratic Team have clearly abandoned any attempt at trying to convince the Republican Senators to convict Trump, and they’re focusing all of their energy to the American People’s emotions.

There was a point in their case presentation when it got so cheesy, so melodramatic, that it was offensive. This was when one of the lady Lawyers came up to continue their case, and at the end, this lady had the nerve to try and insinuate or equate the Capitol Hill Protest with September 11th! Where the lady said, roughly: “24 heroic Americans died on September 11th, when they laid their lives down in that airplane headed for this very building. Those heroes save our lives. And I appreciate the heroes [Capitol Hill cops] who risked their lives to save ours that day of the insurrection,” and the lady proceeded to produce a very fake and insincere look of sadness. There was no reason whatsoever to bring up September 11th with the Capitol Hill Protest. The two had nothing to do with each other. It’s a dangerous non-sequitur, to imply that the 911 terrorists and the Capitol Hill Protesters were the same breed of violent people: terrorists.

My last thoughts on the Democrat’s case is the amateurish nature of Trump’s so-called “insurrection.” Those Democrats tried really hard to make the Protesters look like terrorists, where they used inaccurate descriptions such as “armed to the teeth,” and “50 feet away from us all being killed.”

Trump’s problem is that he confuses soldiers with protesters with guns. A militia [survivalist enthusiast with guns] and trained soldiers are two very different breed of people. A soldier is first of all professionally trained in and out of the battlefield to be an effective killer of enemy combatants. And out in the battlefield, when enemy soldiers are shooting at you, as a soldier being shot at, you have no choice but to use deadly and lethal force to protect yourself and fellow soldiers.

Whereas a “militia” or a group of right-wing guys with scary looking rifles, who spend their time in the woods target practicing, who have never been trained to kill, who do not possess the mentality and psychology of a killer soldier, who is not being fired at by enemy combatants, who has never killed anything in their lives, who have never seen anything killed in real life before, regardless of how angry and hateful their speech and rhetoric may be: simply does not have the Nature and Ethos of a soldier and simply cannot psychologically and emotionally get themselves to intentionally kill anyone. The intention/intent to actually commit murder was not present in those Protestors, and neither was the correct Nature and Ethos present in those Protestors: they were not at Capitol Hill to intentionally harm anyone with lethal force. Yes, their language was angry and violent and at times hateful, but they were not “insurrectionists” by definition, nor by Nature & Ethos. They are simply and mostly undereducated people who really liked Trump, who believed Trump’s fabrications of stolen votes, and who were ultimately used and duped by Trump and his Friends as pawns and patsies. A guy who looks scary and who spews right-wing stuff, who has a rifle, and who has only ever used said rifle to shoot at empty soda cans and use said rifle as photo-op props for social media to look cool to their peers is not a killer and does not have the skills or capacity to take down a government. Which should be obvious, because the Protest at Capitol Hill was in no way coherent or planned: those people had no idea what they were doing or where they were going. They were just angry, and were venting their anger.

/Chloe