House Guest

Posted: July 17th, 2021 | Author: | Filed under: Civil War, Current Affair, David Myatt, Far-Right, Leftists, Liberals, Monarchism, Mundanes, National Socialism, neo-marxism, Nihilism, O9A, O9A Nine Angles, Occultism, Order of Nine Angles, Order of the Nine Angles, racial equity, Reichsfolk, Satanic Heresy, Satanic Polemics, The Sinister Dialectic, The Sinister Game, The Sinister Tradition, The Sinisterly Numinous Tradition, Traditionalism | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on House Guest

.:.I believe that the universe and everything in it is Phenomenally Fractal in nature. I tried to explain this concept HERE. I use the word “fractal” and the term “Phenomenally Fractal” according to that linked explanation. And so a house and a nation are fractal patterns of each other, phenomenally speaking. Why so? Because both a house [the household] and the nation [its citizens] are in Reality [re: Realism] composed of Human Beings, and with such Human Beings comes Human Nature, Human Interactions, Human Relations, Social Skills [or lack thereof], etc.

The thing about a fractal pattern is that the small Pattern and the big Pattern are the same Pattern. It’s just a difference in magnitude, degree, and scale. And so, if it’s hard to understand the big pattern, you just have to understand the little pattern, and scale your understanding Up several magnitudes.

For example: as far as basic biological/organismic phenomena go, all biological organisms Fractally function in the same way, Fundamentally. And so, we observe or consider a bacterium. The bacterium must metabolize external stuff [eat shit], and it replicates itself to make more of its kind. Those are “phenomenal patterns,” which means that they are Patterns of Observable Phenomena. And such phenomenal patterns Repeat: we humans are one representation of that pattern repeating because in our scale and magnitude – we are huger in size and corporeal density/mass than one bacterium – we also eat shit and replicate. You can learn a lot by considering and studying Natural Phenomena and Fractal Phenomena.

Little Patterns

I have a 48ish year old skinhead friend named Brad [he’s from American Front]. He’s very addicted to meth. He’s been in and out of jails and prisons since he was 14. He’s a violent felon, a very violent one. The type with nothing to lose are often the most violent and deadly. If he’s not in prison: he’s homeless. Unfortunately, as a caring friend [meaning I think about his well-bring and welfare and safety], I believe he is better off in prison, because at least he has a roof over his head, food to eat, and it’s harder for him to get meth. One day, Brad came to me with some good news: he had found a room to live in. He said that an old friend of his named Dave let him stay in a trailer in the old friend’s yard for free! I thought that was awful nice of that old friend to let Brad live there for free! And that was all he told me about that situation. I’m the type of person who doesn’t ask questions or pry into people’s lives: if you don’t tell me shit, I don’t ask or question you. I’ve been acquainted with many Niners for many years, over the past 13 years: and I don’t know anything about any of them, not even their real names. I never ask; out of respect [meaning: I respect your privacy]. If you want me to know shit, you’d tell me.

Well, a year after Brad had lived with Dave, Brad got arrested and went back to prison for a few years. Brad called me from prison and asked me to do him an important favor. He asked me to go to Dave’s house, and make sure all of his computers and valuable belongings were locked inside his trailer, and to keep the keys, and to tell Dave not to let the Others fuck with his shit, or he’ll stab and kill people when he gets out. I gave Brad my Word that I’d do as he asked as soon as I get off the phone with him. I figured that Brad must have roommates or something. I didn’t ask who those Other people were. He didn’t tell me. So I drove myself to Dave’s house, which was/is in West Covina [this was when I lived in Southern Cali].

The house was a dump. There was trash and beer cans everywhere. Bike and car parts everywhere. Most of the bike parts belonged to Brad: he steals bikes and takes them apart and build his own bike out of the parts. He told me so. There were a lot of people there at the house. They all looked like meth addicts and homeless people. I saw a few used needles here and there. I suddenly realized what kind of house my friend Brad was living at: a Dope House, sometimes called a Crack House as well. I began to image and assume that this Dave guy was some OG gang member from the neighborhood. I thought so from the look of the others at that house. The guys told me Dave was inside and to just walk in. I was afraid to walk inside. The inside of the house smelled like urine. There was junk everywhere. Litter mixed with beer cans, beer bottles, clothes. People were sleeping on the sofa. The kitchen looked like nobody had cleaned it in years. Most of the people that live there were Mexicans. There was one black guy, a skinny white girl I recognized named Veronica. Veronica was the local parking lot prostitute who sucked random men off in their cars for $10 so she can by meth and lunch. I found Dave in the back. I was shocked to see what he looked like, and what kind of person he was. Nothing like I had imagined.

Dave was a 60-years-old white guy. He had grey and white hair. He wore a dirty white tee-shirt and shorts. He was chubby and had a big pot belly. His legs looked sickly, or diseased, with sores, and discoloration. He was drinking a beer and smoking marijuana. He kindly offered me a beer. I declined. Dave wasn’t a gang member of any kind. He was the total and absolute opposite. I stayed there, getting to know him. I was curious why he lived in that house and how things got so bad for him. He talked a lot and was opened about his life and situation.

Dave inherited that house from his dead mother. He once lived in that house with his older brother. But his older brother died of liver failure, from drinking too much. Dave had very bad diabetes which were affecting is legs. His legs are mostly numb, and the doctors told him that they will need to amputate them off if their condition doesn’t get better. Dave told me his liver is bad. He told me that he has no family, no children, nothing to live for. And so he is committing slow suicide by drinking himself to death. He doesn’t care anymore. He said he’s going to party until he dies. Dave is gay. His boyfriend, a 60-year-old meth addict, lives with him in the house.

But Dave believes himself to be a Christian. He reads the bible, but feels that he is no longer worthy to go to church. And so, being a Christian, he has compassion. He says he feels sorry – pity – for the homeless kids who are addicted to drugs and wants to help them out by giving them a place to crash [squat] during the night. In exchange for letting them stay in his house during the night, they give Dave and his boyfriend free meth. And during the day time, they all drink, do meth, and “party.” The house has been raided by the police and swat team twice, for all the drug use and drug dealing. Dave was very gentle and soft spoken in demeanor. He was a genuinely nice guy. Too nice for his own good and to his own detriment.

When my friend Brad got out of prison, I told him about the things Dave had told me. Brad says to me: “Dave’s cool, but he lets everybody fucking use him. He’s too nice. He can’t get himself to kick those fucking low lifes out of his fucking house. They trash the fucking place, call their friends over, they eat his shit, don’t clean up after themselves. I told Dave: ‘Dude, either kick them all out, or give me the authority to do it, cuz I will, cuz you’re letting them fucking abuse you man!’ And he gave me the authority to kick people out. So I’ve been kicking everyone out left and right, but they keep fucking coming back! He’s got no fucking backbone. It’s his fucking house!”

Conversely: when I was little, my big mom [auntie who adopted me] and my uncle-dad [her husband], owned a donut shop called Spudnuts. Spudnuts was a franchise owned by a Chinese-Khmer guy we call “Mr. Chiang.” My family and Mr. Chiang were friends. Mr. Chiang gave my aunt mom a donut store to have. At one time Mr. Chiang was a multimillionaire, getting rich from the franchise. Today – like so many Chinese-Khmer of his mercantile breed – Mr. Chiang has lost all his money, lost his wife and kids, his home, everything, due to gambling. He works in a casino now to pay his depts.

It’s a simple Game, so the Buddha tells us. The gods place your life’s desires in front of you, and says to you: “Everything you desire in your heart, has been placed before you. You have but to remain supremely focused and reach for it. BUT! We will allow the demon Mara to entice you with vices and distractions. If you fall victim to Mara: you lose everything.” It seems like a simple Game, but most people lose themselves in Mara.

Which is the old meaning of the tarot’s devil Card: the chains around the man and woman are loose. The man and woman can take them off at any time. But they can’t. They are addicted, crave [Tanha in Buddhism], attached to their distractions, addictions, vices, greeds, Loba. Thus, theirs is a self-imposed enslavement/engrossment. Such was the case of Mr. Chiang.

So, back when I was little, we had a donut shop. And we had a baker named Francisco. Francisco was a very light skinned Hispanic man, about 30 at the time. He spoke no English. He literally knew only a handful of words. I understand simple Spanish, and so I understood Francisco most of the time. Francisco was an illegal alien. He had come into America only a few years [at that time]. He was a new-comer, and had no family out here. Using hand gestures, very broken English, and with the regular customers as translators, Francisco told my big mom that in Mexico he used to bake donuts and pastries, and that he would like a job. And so my big mom gave him a job. That’s how our family met Francisco. He baked very good and fast.

After a few month of working for us, my uncle-dad had asked Francisco where he lived. We learned that Francisco was homeless and that he used what money we payed him to get motel rooms and buy food, and whatever money he had left over, he sent back to his parents back in Mexico who were too old to work, plus the little town they came from had no work. Francisco was in Nature and Ethos a descent person; an honourable and Loyal person. My uncle-dad and big mom felt sorry for Francisco. We had an extra room at our house. It was the secondary garage. Asians with big families have this odd habit of liking to convert their garages into spare bedrooms for their relatives. This is what it’s typically like when an Asian family is house shopping: Me: “Ooh, auntie, I found a nice house in your price range! It’s got 4 bedrooms and 2 bathrooms!” Auntie: “How many garage units does that house have?” Me: “Two.” Auntie: “That’s two extra rooms you know. We can fit your youngest uncle’s whole family in that house with us!”

And so, my uncle-dad and big mom talked to each other, and decided to let Francisco live with us, in that spare room. It was an insulated converted room. So it was comfortable to stay in. The garage door was always opened so Francisco can watch TV in the living room. And the kitchen was his to use to cook his Mexican food. If we had dinner, we’d call him to the dinner table to eat with us. When he made his food, he shared it with me and the others.

Francisco didn’t speak English, and so what conversations he had with my family was sparse and broken. But he tried to learn English and a few Khmer and Thai words. He was always respectful in how he talked and in how he carried himself around my family members who were older than him. And he gave my uncle-dad and big mom special gentle and friendly treatment. If there was anything they needed, Francisco would go do it. My uncle-dad and big mom only charged him $100 a month for the room, so he can have money to send to his elderly parents. He never caused any problems. He treated me and cousin-siblings kindly, like as if he were a big brother. If my grandma came to visit, or one of our elders came, Francisco learned to clasp his hands together to greet them, like we do, and he would respectfully and quietly, with head bowed, dismiss himself into his room.

But nobody is perfect. Francisco had a small problem: every Saturday and Sunday he was never home. During the weekend, he went out with his friends to drink and dance all night. And he spent all of his money he made in those two days. There were times when Francisco had to borrow money from my uncle-dad. It became a problem of Metta [Buddhism for Fellowship and Compassion or the Love and Affection Between Friends]. The problem was that Francisco was in this country to work in order to save money so he can send back to his parents, but he partied all weekend and spent all his whole paycheck. Rather than kick him out, my big mom – via a translator – made a deal with Francisco. She told him: “Instead of giving you your whole paycheck, what I will do is take out $100 from it for your rent, I will give you some spending money. And the rest of your paycheck, I will place inside a savings account for you, which you will not have access to. Every two months we will take that money out and I will watch you send that money to your parents. I am speaking to you as an older sister to a younger brother because I care.”

And so Francisco agreed to the deal and idea, and allowed my big mom to handle his money, and he treated my big mom as his own older sister. Francisco lived with us for a few years, until he found himself a wife, and they moved out together. When he got married and moved out, he was still our baker. And instead of my big mom taking care of his money, his wife did.

Big Patterns

And so, in the first example case, you have a caring, compassionate Christian man, who had a house, and out of pity, he allowed people to live in his house. And those people took over the house, they called their friends over, and they controlled the house, and Dave had no power or gut/heart to kick them all out. Dave’s home situation was fucked up. Dave was very Liberal. He was too nice, for his own good, and to his own detriment.

In the second example case, a house is owned by an Asian family [mine]. That Asian family has supremacy and hegemony in that house. It’s our house, we bought it. But we had an extra room, and we did not mind sharing that room with a non-family member, in fact we wanted to share it. And so a Mexican guy moved into the Asian House. That Mexican guy is not a family member. Not a share or stake holder in that House. Did not build that house. Did not help pay for that house. Therefore that Mexican guy is not an Equal, not a Peer to/of that Asian Family. The House is diverse in Ethnicities and Culture, but there is no such thing as equality in that house. The Mexican guy has no say or power in how the house is administered, he has not say or power in how the children should be raised, and so on. The official culture in the House was still Asian. The official language of the House was still Khmer and English. Nothing about the House was changed to accommodate the Mexican guy’s culture or language. Francisco was just a House Guest. The Asian Family desired for him to stay with them, and the Mexican guy was honourable and respectful, and Loyal to the owners of the House. Lastly the Owner to Guest Ratio was proper: the Asian Family was the Majority, and the Mexican guy, being one person was a small and manageable population.

In the bigger pattern of Nation-States, the West is today dominated by Daves. Leftists are not evil or bad people, if I may say so sans the political rhetoric. They are nice people. A little too nice for their own good, and to their own detriment. They let in all of these people. These other races, for an initial good and kind reason. It’s nice to give a shit about millions of people in other countries who are being killed by their own government, whose country is torn by civil war, and so on. But like Dave, Leftists let in way to may people and other ethnicities, who then call and bring their family and friends. And they come here and trash the country, and slowly turn the country into a third world nation. And like Dave, the Leftists find it very hard to kick such people out.

Conversely, you have the case of a country like Japan. Sure there are White people living in Japan, for decades even. But those White people are House Guests. Those White people are not equal to the race or ethnicity who Founded and Created the civilization and country of Japan. It’s not their fucking country. They have no say in how Japan should be run, in whether or not Japanese women can or can’t get abortions, on how the Japanese military should conduct itself, on how the Japanese economy should work, on how Japanese culture and traditions and religions should be canceled to make things equal so the White people feel better. They are guests, respectful guests, legally there, maybe even citizens, but Japan is not their Blood and Soil. And lastly, the White people in Japan are very small in populational number.

The way that my family see things, and the way that I was raised by them: we understand that America is not our country. White people made America. And so, from our perspective: it’s not our country. Therefore, we are House Guests. And as House Guests there is a right and proper way to act and behave, and a right and proper way to treat and interact with the Founding Race: with respect and with what we in Khmer call “Goun/Khoun” which means “Sacred Debt.”

Goun is hard to explain to a modern Westerner. When your mother gave birth to you: you owe her something big and special, because she gave you life. Thus, you are in her debt, and must pay that debt by taking care of her when she is old and elderly. That’s Goun. Goun also means that you understand a person has done you a favor, and so therefore, you are bound by Honour to return that favor when you are called upon: Mafia ethics. Goun also means that if or when you need a job to pay your bills and a person hires you: you “have Goun” for that person. Therefore you owe him not only your respect, but a debt or a favor in return. And so, out of respect for that person giving you a job which pays your house and feeds your family: you work hard and proper as an employee.

Goun also means, to place yourself Beneath another person. In English we say that we are “Under your debt.” Suggesting and implying that you are beneath or below or inferior or subordinate to the person who was kind enough to help you, feed you, clothe you, shelter you, took you in, and so on. And that the person you owe a debt to is above you. In other words, it’s also called Humbleness and Humility, which is the opposite of Hubris in practice. As my Grandmother says about White people and being in America: “We have Goun for them because they took us in, let us live her in peace, they nurtured us, and so in return for what they have done for us, we should not harm their people/race or cause their country to go bad [she means to be fucked up]. Because America is not our house. We are only guests.”

In ancient times, diversity existed, but under different conditions. One condition was that the ancient world was mostly monarchal in model. This basically means that when you are an ethnic group who has lost your home nation to drought or famine or whatever, and you migrate to a new land, you asked the king of that land for safe passage and for a place for your people to stay. And the king would say something like: “I will give your people that field there which you may till, but you will pay me taxes and a portion of what you grow, and when I have a war, you will give me your sons as soldiers.” And that was your debt you owed the king. Being a monarchy also means that as a people living as guests in a foreign kingdom: you obviously have no say or power in how that kingdom should be run and administered! And your people, being guests, are a small minority compared to the hegemonic race who adopted you or allowed you to live amongst them.

Being a minority back then is a good and necessary thing. It teaches you your place and allotment in life: you/we as a minority people are in total dependence upon the compassion of the king and his government and people. Your freedom and lives depends on the king and his government giving such things to you and your people. If you fuck shit up, that freedom and your life can be taken away. Diversity can exist, under certain conditions. But Diversity and Equality cannot exist together at the same time: or we have Natural Laws of struggle, rivalry, and competition come into play. As primates, and as animals, we humans are actually a territorial creature. We fight and struggle for territory and resources. The Majority owns the territory and resources, and if they have a surplus of such, they may share it with your minority guest people. As a minority people you are in debt to and dependent upon the hegemonic majority race/people.

Here in the West, like here in America, we are beginning to slowly understand that Democracy + Diversity + Equality – Honour – Debt – Hierarchy – Direction = Societal Collapse. Democracy here meaning: when the emotively whimsical Mass has the power to make decisions. People, especially from the third world, who come to America, no longer have any sense of Honour, Loyalty, or Duty. They come here for the free stuff, to out breed White people, and to ethnically struggle for dominance. Fractal patterns repeat, in degree, magnitude, and scale: what is happening right now in South Africa, will happen here in 25 years. For more on White Hegemony in America, see THIS ESSAY.

/Chloe

 

 

 

 


Loyalty

Posted: July 9th, 2021 | Author: | Filed under: David Myatt, Drecc, Dreccian, Generation Three, Iteration Three, Monarchism, Mundanes, National Socialism, Next Generation, Nihilism, O9A, O9A Nine Angles, Occultism, Order of Nine Angles, Order of the Nine Angles, Phase Three, Reichsfolk, The Sinister Dialectic, The Sinister Tradition, The Sinisterly Numinous Tradition, Third Iteration, Traditionalism | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Loyalty

.:.There is no such thing as equality in Nature. We can repeat that natural fact all we want, but the average person is ignorant and stupid when it comes to the Nature, Ethos, and Quality of individual people, breeds of people, ethnic folks of people, and races of people. Does everyone have the Same work ethics?

I’m not fucking lazy when I work. Working for Chinese people is hell [my family is mostly ethnic Chinese]. And working for your own family who are Chinese is even harder than hell. 7 days a week. 10-11 hours a day. No breaks, You take a lunch whenever you can squeeze it in. No vacations. No fucking minimum wage: you get whatever is left over after the family shop’s bills are paid, after supplies have been bought, and after your family uses the money to pay the mortgage. I never once complained. Never called in sick. My friends asked me: “Why don’t you quit the family business and get a real job?” Because I’m Loyal: to my family. There is no such thing as equality in Nature. And so we each, as individual people, have our own Degree and Magnitude of work ethics. Therefore, unless you have the same Level of work ethics as I do: we aren’t Peers.

The same with Honour. There is no such thing as equality in Nature. A Traditional Brahminical Southeast Asian family is structured, hierarchal. Your Great Grandmother is the boss and matriarch of the entire family/clan. Under the Great Grandmother is your own grandmother. Under your grandmother is your own mother. In such a Traditional family, your grandmother has more authority than your father [if the father is an outsider]. An “outsider” is a person who marries into your family. Like you have a mother, and your mother has a sister who is your auntie, and that auntie married a man: that man your aunt married is an outsider, and he has no say in how you will be raised and in what culture you will be raised in, because he is not blood, not family. Your mother’s brothers are your Fathers in the family. If your grandmother has a son who is your father, and he married a woman who is your birth mother: she is an outsider, and your father’s sisters are your mothers, not the woman who gave birth to you.

If the Great Grandmother or your grandmother have judged that your birth parents do not have the proper requirements to raise you properly, they can dictate that your parents give you up to one of your aunts or uncles, who becomes your adopted parents. Which was what happened to me and a few of my other cousins. My birth mother had me when she was about 13, and being so young, she didn’t have the proper requirements to raise me right, and raise me inside the Traditional Culture. And so my late Great Grandmother, her daughter [my grand auntie], and my grandmother decided to give me to my birth mother’s eldest sister, who has raised me since I was born. I call my birth mother “little [underling/inferior] mom” and my auntie who is my adopted mother “big [superior] mom.” But why does everybody in the family put up with such rules, hierarchy, to the point where your elders can take your children away from you? Why not run away or move away? Why follow such rules and structure? Because of Loyalty and Honour. And so, not everybody has the same level of Honour. If you barely get along with your parents and siblings: you don’t have the same kind and level of Honour as I do, and so we aren’t Peers, we aren’t Equals.

The same with Loyalty. There is no such thing as equality in Nature. And so, not everybody has the same sense, kind, and level of Loyalty. Like Honour and Work Ethics: Loyalty is observable in your human behavour and way of life. Different individuals have different degrees and magnitudes of Loyalty. If your were in a street gang, and your gang leader told you to pull the trigger and kill someone: would you do it? If you were a soldier and your commander told you to kill an enemy soldier: would you do it? If you were a Muslim, and your religion told you to kill an infidel: would you do it?

Loyalty in Buddhism is a Dhamma. Dhamma [Pali] means Phenomenon. Like Nature has natural phenomena which can be observed. And the insights we get from such observation tells us about the Nature and Ethos of Nature. The same with Loyalty as a Dhamma. As a Dhamma, shit like Loyalty and Honour is observable in how you are being human. And the insights we get from observing such things tell us about your Nature and Ethos as a Breed of person.

There are certain breeds of human who lack any sense of Loyalty, and you can see it: they jump around from religion to religion, from god to god, from holy book to holy book. Never Loyal to any single religion, any single god, any single holy book. They discard their own ethnic culture and traditions. They cheat on their wives and husbands, on their boyfriends and girlfriends, lacking Loyalty/Commitment. They lack any real Loyalty to friends, their blood relations, their associates, their folk, their Culture, their Traditions, their Race.

Loyalty is hard. Because human nature and human behaviour and human relationships aren’t easy and smooth. You get into fights and arguments. And if the Bond of Loyalty is strong: after such fights, you revert back to being Loyal associates, Loyal Blood. Living in a big family, or living with friends, makes it so that sometimes you get on each other’s nerves. But we’re stuck with each other, through thick and thin, for better or for worse. The internet is interesting because it makes the world a small place, and you see or interact with the same people year after year. You get on each other’s nerves, get into arguments, but the Bonds of Loyalty never break for those of us with High Quality and High Level of Loyalty.

Loyalty is also hard because there is no such thing as equality in Nature: which also means that your friends and family members are not like you. My own sister is a Liberal and a Leftist and she strongly supports Critical Race Theory and believes that White people are inherently racist. My boy cousins [who are mostly Chinese in ethnicity] wants China to be the world superpower. I have a few Five Percenter Black Friends who are into the Black Power Movement. And so, in such cases, Loyalty trumps such differences. Loyalty in such cases is when you set such differences aside, and make it a rule to never talk about religion or politics with each other: because such topics are divisive. And you love each other, care for one another, despite such differences.

In the ancient world, the ancient Aryan ethnicities in the Aryavarta, understood this concept of Natural Inequality, that Uniqueness exists in nature and Humanity, and that human breeds and human individuals have unequal capacity for Intelligence, Philosophical understanding, Sagely Wisdom, Honour, Loyalty, Ethics, Strengths, Bravery, Craftiness, and so on. And so, in such ancient times, they structured their social order into a hierarchy. At the top were the humans with the most excellent Nature and Ethos of Sages. Below the Sages were the natural aristocracy who had high capacity for Honour and Loyalty. Below the aristocracy were the soldiers/warriors who were naturally brave and death defiant. Below the warriors were the clever and crafty merchants and tradesmen. And below them were the Common, the Mundane, the Average, the Anarya [Unaryan], who are a savage and ignorant breed of humans who lack high mental capacity, lack intelligence, lacked Honour, lacked Loyalty.

Today, such concept of hierarchy based on your level of intelligence, sagely wisdom, bravery, Honour, and Loyalty is alien to the typical Westerner. And so we vote and elect basal breeds of humans: Commoners, Mundanes, Anarya, into political offices of power, based on the promises they make and opinions they have… and our elected officials become corrupt, make themselves rich, and do as little as possible to make the machinery of the Nation work. It’s not such elected officials fault: it’s your fault because you voted them into power and you are the Anarya. This is what happens when you give the Common, unthinking mob of Underlings the power to make political, social, martial [war shit], economic, and religious decisions/matters. It’s lunacy.

Loyalty is the Defining Quality and Characteristic of an ONA initiate/associate. Did you know that? We forget sometimes don’t we:

The O9A Code of Kindred Honour

Those who are not our kindred brothers or sisters are mundanes. Those who are our brothers and sisters live by – and are prepared to die by – our unique code of honour.

Our Kindred-Honour means we are fiercely loyal to only our own ONA kind. Our Kindred-Honour means we are wary of, and do not trust – and often despise – all those who are not like us, especially mundanes.

Our duty – as individuals who live by the Code of Kindred-Honour – is to be ready, willing, and able to defend ourselves, in any situation, and to be prepared to use lethal force to so defend ourselves.

Our duty – as individuals who live by the Code of Kindred-Honour – is to be loyal to, and to defend, our own kind: to do our duty, even unto death, to those of our brothers and sisters to whom we have sworn a personal oath of loyalty.

Our obligation – as individuals who live by the Code of Kindred-Honour – is to seek revenge, if necessary unto death, against anyone who acts dishonourably toward us, or who acts dishonourably toward those to whom we have sworn a personal oath of loyalty.

Our obligation – as individuals who live by the Code of Kindred-Honour – is to never willingly submit to any mundane; to die fighting rather than surrender to them; to die rather (if necessary by our own hand) than allow ourselves to be dishonourably humiliated by them.

Our obligation – as individuals who live by the Code of Kindred-Honour – is to never trust any oath or any pledge of loyalty given, or any promise made, by any mundane, and to be wary and suspicious of them at all times.

Our duty – as individuals who live by the Code of Kindred-Honour – is to settle our serious disputes, among ourselves, by either trial by combat, or by a duel involving deadly weapons; and to challenge to a duel anyone – mundane, or one of our own kind – who impugns our kindred honour or who makes mundane accusations against us.

Our duty – as individuals who live by the Code of Kindred-Honour – is to settle our non-serious disputes, among ourselves, by having a man or woman from among us (a brother or sister who is highly esteemed because of their honourable deeds), arbitrate and decide the matter for us, and to accept without question, and to abide by, their decision, because of the respect we have accorded them as arbitrator

Our duty – as kindred individuals who live by the Code of Kindred-Honour – is to always keep our word to our own kind, once we have given our word on our kindred honour, for to break one’s word among our own kind is a cowardly, a mundane, act.

Our duty – as individuals who live by the Code of Kindred-Honour – is to act with kindred honour in all our dealings with our own kindred kind.

Our obligation – as individuals who live by the Code of Kindred-Honour – is to marry only those from our own kind, who thus, like us, live by our Code and are prepared to die to save their Kindred-Honour and that of their brothers and sisters.

Our duty – as individuals who live by the Code of Kindred-Honour – means that an oath of kindred loyalty or allegiance, once sworn by a man or woman of kindred honour (“I swear on my Kindred-Honour that I shall…”) can only be ended either: (1) by the man or woman of kindred honour formally asking the person to whom the oath was sworn to release them from that oath, and that person agreeing so to release them; or (2) by the death of the person to whom the oath was sworn. Anything else is unworthy of us, and the act of a mundane.

Many are called to ONA. The Mythos of ONA attracts a lot of people. It’s easy to get into ONA. There is no membership. You read the ONA Corpus, put the shit into practice in whole or in part. But Time is your Tester. Because in Time, as Time passes: the Breed of Human that you are becomes visible and observable. And if you are the Common Breed of Anarya: your lack of Loyalty will cause you to leave ONA, to find something new, and better. Like how your kind and breed play musical chairs with your gods, religions, culture, and shit: moving around, jumping around. Many are called, but few Chosen.


–David Myatt

 

/Chloe


Caste & Hegemony

Posted: May 27th, 2021 | Author: | Filed under: Acausal Theory, Alchemy, Anarcho-Nihilism, Anarchy, Far-Right, Heretical Texts, Islam, Leftists, Liberals, Monarchism, National Socialism, neo-marxism, O9A, O9A Nine Angles, Occultism, Order of Nine Angles, Order of the Nine Angles, Reichsfolk, Satanic Heresy, Satanic Polemics, The Sinister Dialectic, The Sinister Game, The Sinister Tradition, The Sinisterly Numinous Tradition | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Caste & Hegemony

.:.Brahmanism was brought to the Indochinese Peninsula many hundreds of years ago when the Kamboja-Aryans migrated there, by way of following the Mekong River from Kashmir [Northern Hindustan]; even before Buddhism took root in that peninsula. And so, although Southeast Asian culture/society is today Theravada Buddhist, much of our culture/society retains a lot of Brahmanism. One of the Brahmanist things we still retain is the caste system, although in our culture/society it’s not as religious and rigid as how the Hindus do thing.

The word “Brahmanism” by the way does not mean the wordship or religion of Brahma. In Khmer, the term makes more sense and is more descriptive, we call Brahmanism in Khmer as: “Priamagne Sasana.” I’ve phonetically spelled the word “Priamagne” according to the French, which is easier for me. And so the consonantal cluster of “GN” in Priamagne is pronounced as the “GN” in Filet Mignon; and the final “E” in Priamagne is silent.

Priamagne is our word for The Brahman/Brahmins, who are the Priestly Sages who occupy the very tippy top of the Caste Hierarchy. Priamagne is the Collective Singular word for them – The Brahman – much like saying “The Khmer,” “The Irish,” “The French,” “The English,” “The Viet Cong,” and so on. “A Brahmin” [the individual singular] is “Priam” which is pronounced in English phonetics as “Pree-yum” [the terminal -iam sounding exactly like the -iam in the name William].

The word “Sasana” means: 1) Culture, 2) Practice, 3) Observance, 4) Ordinance, 5) Custom, 6) Way/Procedure, 6) Precedent, 7) Tradition, & 8) Religion. Sasana doesn’t only mean the reductive “religion.” For example: when I cut the skin off my apples, I use a knife, and I face the blade towards my body, and I cut the skin in that Way, according to that Procedure and Custom. And so my grandmother will laugh and say in Khmer: “You cut your apples according to the Sasana of the Americans.” The Khmer, according to how they do things, hold the knife with the blade facing away from their body, and they strip the peel piece by piece and somehow don’t cut their fingers.

And so Priamagne Sasana means something like: The Traditions, Culture, and Religious Practices and Ordinances of the Brahmin Sages, as such are expounded by them according to the Vedas, and by oral tradition/transmission. Therefore, what we today know as “Hinduism,” is a subset or branch of Brahmanism which is culturally specific to the People of the Indus/Hindus River. And so, what Hindus practice and observe in India may and will differ from how Brahmanism is practiced in places like Indochina and Bali. A simple example: Hindus usually do not eat cow meat, because they believe cows are holy, whereas some Brahmanists eat beef and raise cattle for meat. Although my grandmother abstains from eating beef. Another example of difference is that in India and to Hindus the Vedas are of Primal/Principle sectarian regard/importance, whereas in the Brahmanism of Indochina and Bali, the Mahabharata [the Holy Bhagavad Gita is a section of the Mahabharat Epic] and Ramayana are more culturally important. Another difference is that in Indochina, specifically amongst the Thai, Khmer, and Lao, our Brahmanism has been syncretized with Theravada Buddhism for hundreds of years, such that the Brahmanism is the Culture and the Buddhism is the religion. The Buddha is considered to be an avatar of Vishnu. Thus, Angkor Wat is both an ancient Temple for Vishnu as well as a Buddhist Temple.

Regarding Castes

Since very ancient times, the Brahman have expounded as a part of their cultural traditions [sasana] the caste system. Caste in Sanskrit is “Varna.”

So now, “varna” reductively means “Color,” as in the color of your skin. Varna doesn’t mean “rank” or “level.” The Sanskrit word “Varna” over the centuries has lost most of its original meanings. Thus, to better understand what that word meant in ancient times, we must go and see what the Pali [Pali is to Italian what Sanskrit is to Latin] word means. Pali being the dead language used as a sacerdotal and liturgical language of Theravada Buddhism means that its words are very conservative [the meanings don’t change, because it’s a dead language, and because such meanings are literally religiously kept as is]. In Pali and Theravada Buddhism Varna is “Vanna”:

If Dharma then Vanna. Dharma is to Dharmakaya what Vanna is to Manussa [human beings]. Dharma is the Way/Tao/Ethos/Laws/Principles of Nature, and Dharmakaya literally means “Body of Nature.” The Laws or Ways of Nature can be Observed in the Body of Nature, because such Observations are the Appearance and Expression of the Body of Nature.

And so we Observe that clouds rain and the rain water feeds and nourishes forests. And so the action/behavior/activity of the Body of Nature raining, and watering forests is an Expression and an observable Appearance of the Body of Nature. Thus, in Pali, the word Dharma is Dhamma, which also means Phenomenon. A Phenomenon is an observable action, behavior, activity, expression, constitution of the Body of Nature [Dhammakaya in Pali].

Thus, the word Vanna means the following: Look, Appearance, Color [red = ripe, green = unripe, white clouds = no rain, black clouds = rain, etc], Beauty, Constitution, Complexion of your skin, and Expression.

Your Vanna is your Constitutional Make-up as a human being, according to your Dharma: your wyrd, your natural inclinations, your natural proclivities, your nature, your physis, your ethos, your natural disposition; the abilities, capabilities, and capacities which Nature has given to you as a human being. And because your Vanna is born from your Dharma: your Vanna is an observable phenomenon of your Human Character/Quality.

If by natural disposition you are kind, respectful, and gentlemanly: that is your Vanna. If the type and quality of person you are is distrusting, spiteful, and hateful: that is your Vanna. If by natural proclivity and natural passion you like music, and you dedicate years and years to become a Musician: that is your Vanna; you are an Artisan. If by natural abilities you become a self-made millionaire Vanna; you are a successful tradesman/merchant. If by natural proclivity and capacity of mind you are a philosopher like Plato or Lao Tzu or whoever: that is your Vanna; you are a Brahmin. If by natural disposition you like weapons and fighting, and you are naturally brave and death defiant: that is your Vanna; you are according to your nature and ethos [your Dharma] a Warrior. Therefore, there are Peers of a certain Vanna, a peerage of people sharing the same Vanna.

And according to your Vanna, your natural character and quality [your Dharma] you should be trained accordingly in order to draw out the best of your skills and the best of your specific Breed of Humanity, in order to make you fully human, to fully bring out the gifts and skills that Brahma and the Gods have given to you: in order that you and your skills and abilities will help your Society Function Properly, in a healthy manner such that all members of your society derives proper welfare and well-being.

And so, when you as a human being develop your Dharma, to express your Vanna,  you become a Functioning Person. Like a Part of a Car properly functions in order for the whole car to work. And so, units of a System must function according to their Dharma, in order that the system itself as a Cybernetic Whole functions properly. When you do not function [are dysfunctional] as a unit of a society/system, we say that you are “Broken,” like a machine is broken when it doesn’t work:

For more details as to why Sanskrit and ancient Hebrew share words and roots in common, see the following essays in Nexion Zine: Note On The Paragon Self-Initiation Ritual & The Etymology & Secrets Of Cain.

An example of a Broken Human in our contemporary Western society would be the bums who live and sleep on the streets because they are addicted to alcohol or drugs. That is their Vanna as a human being: the type or kind or Breed [other meanings of Vanna] of human they are. And by Dharma: there is nothing inherently wrong or evil with such bums. It’s how Nature/God made them: to be dysfunctional and broken. It is their Dharma, their Vanna. And such bums, according to their Dharma and broken condition, have very few abilities as a means of sustenance and to support their addictions and mode of life. They can dumpster-dive to collect tin cans and plastics to recycle, they can clean the streets and toilets and do other such lowly jobs/chores for money.

And so, in accord with their Vanna, such Broken bums by dharma, collect cans, recycle, clean streets and toilets, and so on. Such would be their “Caste Duties/Jobs.” And so, out of Compassion, we establish a social contract [rules of society] where we say: “Because these bums chose to be such kind/breed of humans, to live on the street, and refuse to work normal jobs, no body who is not a bum may or should collect cans, rummage through dumpsters, and recycle stuff for money, because those jobs are reserved for those bums, because that’s all they can and are willing to do. They need a means to make money somehow to feed themselves and to afford basic creature comforts.”

It’s not that we as a society hate those bums. It is out of compassion, and out of an understanding such bums are the way they are because of how God has made them that we allow them their specific Caste Duties/Jobs. And so, as a compassionate society, we allow them to express their Vanna, their Dharma, to work their Caste Duties [collect cans, rummage through trash bins, recycle shit] as ways to help them make money to buy food, we try to help them have and find shelters, help them have access to medical facilities. But bums, by nature and ethos don’t have the Vanna or Dharma to be death defiant soldiers, or billionaire merchants, or political leaders, or scientists/philosophers, and so we can’t make them into such. Unless they have it in their Nature/Ethos/Dharma to change themselves and become a soldier, a self-made millionaire, a political leader, a philosopher. If they can and have changed themselves, then a Process of Acceptance & Admission into the Peerage of their Vanna takes place:

In the same way of compassion and system/cybernetic awareness, if there were a group of Mexicans who spoke no English and had no skills, but they are good [having the natural proclivity] at making tacos and burritos, then out of compassion, we establish a social contract [rules of society] where we say: “These Mexicans, being more developed as a breed of human than bums, who have the natural skill of making foodstuff in the form of tacos and burritos, no body who is not a Mexican unable to speak English and without possession of other skills, may or should make tacos and burritos to sell for profit, because this specific breed of Mexicans need a means to earn an income to buy food and afford basic creature comforts. Therefore let such breed of Mexicans have the exclusive right to make such tacos and burritos for profit, until such time when they or their descendants have gained other skills useful to society, where then they will be allotted and trained in other duties in accordance with their skills and Vanna.”

Each Vanna behaves like a Guild or a Trade Union composed of Peers, who are of the same Breed, and who possess the same Dharma. In order to officially belong to one of the upper three Vannas – that of the Brahmins, the Kshatrya, and the Vaishya – you first must have the Dharma appropriate of such a Vanna, you secondly must be accepted as an equal/peer of people inhabiting such Vanna, and upon your acceptance as an equal/peer, you underwent a private/secret initiation ceremony, where your peers initiates you into their Vanna. Thus, you were called “Twice Born.” You are Born once as a Generic/Common Human Being, and according to your Breed, Kind, Disposition, Nature, Ethos, Ability, Capacity, Character, Quality: you are Born again among Equals and Peers of your own Breed and Kind: your own Vanna. Birds of a feather flock together, and so on. Your Vanna Peerage then gives you access to the proper society, life style, environment that trains you better as the Vanna you belong to, gives you the privileges and advantages of that Vanna, and so on.

It’s like the son or daughter of a successful musician is born around their father’s Peer musicians, producers, and so on, and so such sons and daughters have access to an environment that can train and make them into musicians. It is like being close friends with or children of a self-made multimillionaire businessman: you have access to a social order, a subculture, an environment which can and will help you express your Dharma and Vanna as a self-made millionaire businessperson. A very wealthy man once said: “I can tell what kind of person you will be by the people you associate with.”

Thus, if you belonged to the Kshatrya caste, and were accepted as an aristocrat by other Breeds of human who are themselves aristocratic in dharma/nature/ethos, then after your Second Birth into that subcaste of Aristocrats, you underwent proper training according to long establish Vanna/Cultural institutions, which would train you to become a statesman, an advisor of kings and generals, etc, according to your dharma.

Also then, before the One who will be King can assume the role and power of a king, that One must first undergo proper training by long established Vanna/Cultural institutions, in order to make you into an intelligent, noble, honorable, and properly functioning monarch. In ancient times, if you were the One who will be king, your educators were the Brahman: the Sages, Academics, Philosophers, Priests, Monks, Nuns, Scientists [social, political, economic, etc]. Your Family [the fruit never falls far from the tree], the level [state of development] of your Noble and Honorable nature, and your Quality and Aptitude and Dharma and then years of training, are what Qualifies you to be a monarch. Not doctrines, or political ideology, or “party” affiliation, or promises you make, or your popularity, or votes casted by the common public who know and understand nothing about Noble and Honorable conduct/virtue, statesmanship; social, political, and economic science, etc. Does it ultimately make any sense to you that a common people, who are in total ignorance of the understanding of human nature, how society works and functions, how civilization works and functions, should have the power to elect a person to run/rule a civilization?

And so, in very ancient days, the word “Arya” [aryan] strictly referred to human beings [of whatever ethnicity or tribe] who occupied the upper three Vannas, that of Brahmin, Kshatriya, and Vaishya. Originally it did not mean a specific ethnicity of people. Arya meant Noble & Honorable:

In Pali and Buddhism the word “Arya” is Ariya:

Meaning things like Noble person, honorable person, a gentleman, one who is well-bred, one who is well-born, one who is aristocratic in nature, and so on. Ariya is related to the Pali word Ayya:

Meaning things like: Sir, Sire, Master, Honorable, one who is worthy [“worshipful” in archaic English].

You find the word Ariya in Buddhism here:

As well as here:

And so, those at the top three levels of the caste system were humans of Noble and Honorable quality, nature, and ethos. Called “Arya” back in such ancient times. And the humans at the lower levels – the Underlings – were ignoble. The Sanskrit word for “ignoble” is Anarya, which is the negative particle “An” plus the word Arya. In English that word is “Unaryan.” You can still see that our English negative particle “Un” is related to the Sanskrit “An.” Says the Bhagavad Gita 2.2:

In Pali and Theravada Buddhism, Anarya [Sanskrit] is “Anariya” [An+Ariya]. Anariya are the breed of people/humans who are not Ariyapuggala – not Noble People, not noble or honorable in quality and nature. They are ignoble, dishonorable, disrespectful, barbaric, belligerent, underdeveloped, uncultured, rough, uncouth. They are mundane, generic, common. They are the breed and type of people/humans Old Europe would have described as being “Savage.” Should mean “Feral” as in feral humans like the primitive aborigine tribes found in Africa, the Amazon jungle, Papua New Guinea. As opposed to the Noble, Cultured people/humans who live in and are members of Civilization proper. And by civilization, we mean a social order.

In the same way – all humans think alike – and in proper context or time and place, the various tribes and ethnicities of people living in Central Asia, who referred to themselves as the Ary/Ari/Aria/Arya, had for themselves 6000 years ago: 1) a city-state civilization, 2) the science of smelting ore and making metal tools and weapons, & 3) the science of domesticating and riding horses. 6000 years ago the Arya were alone in possessing those three things. Then the Aryan diaspora took place, which eventually cause those Aryans to disperse into other lands. And so when those highly developed Aryans encountered other human beings 6000 years ago: such other human beings were very primitive, did not have any kind of civilization, did not know what ore and metal was, did not ride horses. In proper time and place, as one of those Arya, you’d judge those other humans as being primitive, undeveloped, backwards, ignorant, savage, feral, ignoble, not the best or highest or most excellent breed of human being: they were Anarya. And such Anarya breed of humans had no sense of, know nothing about, had no understanding of civilization, society, social order.

And when we say social order, we mean a System. And when we say system we mean a composite cybernetic entity composed parts where each part has a function to perform in order for 1) the system to function & 2) each member-unit to derive well-being. Such as an ecosystem. And so therefore, in order for a system, such as human society or an ecosystem, to function properly, structure and hierarchy is needed, where members of said social order or system are divided into classes or peer groups according to nature, abilities, aptitude, merit, quality, skills, intelligence level, function, nobility, and so on.

Regarding Breed

Like there are different Breeds of dogs: there are different Breeds of humans. It should be obvious. In the old days it was obvious. When an olden-time European, from a very developed social order travels abroad to new lands, and he sees an indigenous human being, naked, living in trees and huts, without writing and so on, they called such people “savages.”

There was a time, in ancient times when the area and city of Angkor [as in Angkor Wat] in the Khmer Empire, when it was the largest metropolis in the world. And so, when a member of Angkor ventured out into the far jungles, and they saw and interacted [traded] with the dark skinned feral aboriginal hill tribes, such primitive, uncultured, aboriginal people were not in character, quality, breed, and kind similar or alike to your own kind, and so if you and your kind refer and consider yourselves to be civilized, cultured, well-bred, noble in disposition [re: ariya/arya], then those underdeveloped human beings were naturally understood to be anariya/anarya, which mean things like: ignoble, feral, wild, having no quality of nobleness, not of an excellent breed, not of a noble breed. Like cultivated Japanese rice versus Wild Rice: one is an excellent Breed of rice with good quality and the other is wild rice. And so the Anariya/Anarya were/are Savages:

The Pali word Vanna was annexed into the Khmer language were it means: Good Looking, Handsome, Beautiful. And is usually a proper name for boys and men, but some girls have that word as a name also. Beauty is a cultural phenomenon. We spend our whole human lives inside of a culture, surrounded by people like ourselves. And so, culturally, people who look like us, with appealing faces to look at are “beautiful, and good looking; handsome.”

And so phrases like “those of our Vanna” and “those not of our Vanna” have interesting contextual meaning. Those of our Vanna, means “those of our breed and kind, who look like us, behave like us, who are beautiful, live like us, are human in the way that we are human.” And the phrase “those not of our Vanna,” means “those who are not of our breed and kind, who do not look like us, who are ugly, unpleasant to look at and behold, who do not live like us, who are human in a different way than how we are human.”

The word for “Ugly” in Khmer is “Akrok,” which also means “Bad, Wicked, Mean, Unkind-hearted, not capable of sharing, untrustworthy.” And so, the Khmer word “Pug-akrok” [pug = puggala] means Criminal, Bad People, People who Harm You, Thief, Gang Member. Pug-Akrok literally means People [pug/pudgala/puggala] + Ugly [akrok]. Ugly People: people who do not look like you, who are not your kind and breed.

Kurupa [ku+rupa] being similar to our English word “Corrupt” in meaning.

Du+Rupa [form, shape, well-formed, appearance]:

Ill-Formed [du-rupa, ku-rupa] meaning both ugly and bad/evil:

The Greek Kakos + Kamomenos:

Kako+kamomenos means ugly:

For more detailed information about Beauty, Intelligence, Evolution, Natural Selection, Sexual Selection, and how they correlate and correspond with each other, see this essay in Nexion Zine: The Neotic Hypothesis Of Evolution.

Just like each dog breed has its own look, appearance, temperament, intelligence level: humans also have breeds where each breed has its own look, appearance, temperament, intelligence level.

Just like how animals and plants, over great spans of time, change and develop/evolve according to their environment: humans also change and develop/evolve according to the environment of each group/tribe. Which is why Black people have very dark skin: because there is a lot of ultraviolet light/radiation hitting sub-Sahara Africa. Your environment even influences the shape and look of your nose:

Humans who developed in cold climates will have tall noses with small/narrow nostrils to keep cold air from lowering the body’s temperature. Whereas Africans have flat noses and big nostrils in order to allow a lot of air to cool the body from the heat of their ancestral environment. Same principle fractally expresses itself in elephants: African elephants have very big ears as a way to cool their bodies down due to the heat of the environment, whereas Asian elephants live in a place that is not as hot, and so they have small ears.

And so, because of the fact that humans have existed in our present form for circa 300,000 years in various places around the earth, in different climates and environments: it’s simply an observable fact that various groups of humans look different than others. You can cry and bitch that race doesn’t exist, but the natural observable fact remains: East Asians have narrow slanty eyes and White Europeans don’t; Africans have very dark skin and Irish people don’t; etc.

Look and Appearance goes even further than skin color and eye or nose shapes. Your life style and health influence how you look. People who eat like pigs, or who have an eating disorder where they constantly eat shit – unhealthy foods – will be fat or obese. It’s obvious that an obese person looks different than a slim person. If you have a group of 12 fat people in the same room: that is a Breed, a Kind, a Type of people, a subset of a variation of human being.

We can all tell those two guys apart. One is a nerd and the other is a bike gang affiliate. They are both White, but they are different Breeds, Kinds, Types, subcastes [Varnas/Vannas have subcastes] of people. Each breed has their own quality, character, temperament, level of intelligence, capacity, proclivity, interests, and so on.

Which of those two guys would you most likely hire to be your accountant or to manage your stock portfolio? The nerd. And so, that nerd’s Vanna – his subcaste – in accordance with his Dharma, functions well as accountants, thinkers, mathematicians, computer coders, and so forth. And that biker guy, according to his Vanna and Dharma, has his own function, activity, job, behavior, interests that he and his Breed excel at. And so we are talking about Excelling at things/function and of Excellence.

If there is an orange tree which produces goodly shaped oranges, with soft sweet flesh, and you judge such oranges to be good and of Excellent quality and nature: then you propagate more of those Kinds of Trees, by Breeding more of them, thereby producing more such Breeds of oranges. In order to maintain, to continue, the propagation of such Excellence, such excellent quality.

Arya, culturally means also both Master and Excellent. The meaning of “Master”:

In Khmer, our word for “Master” is “Mei,” which sounds exactly like the English word “May.” Mei literally means “Female.” And since the Khmer, since ancient times, were/are matriarchal, the very word for “Female,” mean also things like: Manager, Boss, Leader, Master, Lord, Chief, Head, Most High, Above Everything. If someone asks you: “Who is the Mei of your country?” They are asking you who is the Leader/Head/Chief of your country, The Boss. Even if he is a male, he is still the Mei, because he’s the Boss, the Top, the Most High.

And so what we in English call “Mother of Vinegar” the Khmer call “Mei of Vinegar,” because the Mei of Vinegar is the Boss, the Master, the Progenitor, the Creator, of Vinegar. If there is a strain or breed of rice crop that Exels or Exceeds the quality of all other rice crops, that most Excellent Rice crop is said to the Mei of Rice crops: the Master, the Leader, the Most High, the Most Elevated of all kinds of rice crops. The Mei of Grapes is the Best, the Most Excellent, The Master, The Chief, of all breeds and strains of grapes: The Master Breed of Grapes. The Mei of Wine is the Most Excellent, The Master Breed of all kinds of Wine: skillfully and Masterfully crafted by the best wine makers, using the best breed of grape vines. To Master something, means to have the best, the highest, most complete skill of that something:

To be “Arya,” means to be the Best, the Most Excellent, Most Noble, Most Honorable, Most Virtuous, the Most High Quality and Breed of Manussa [human] than all other human breeds. That’s Arya, Mastery, and Excellence. And so, if you value such Excellent Quality of Human, and you value the kinds of knowledge, science, philosophy, inventions, civilizations, etc, that such Most Excellent Quality of Human can create/manifest/make: then you conserve and preserve that Most Excellent Breed.

If you had a business which did well in generating revenue, that Breed or Strain or Type, of business you have will propagate and spread, were you will make more such businesses and other will copy your type of business.

And so like an orchard is to a certain strain or breed of oranges, a Varna of the caste system and its subvarnas, are like orchards which produces, continually, certain Breeds or Strains or Types of humans, of certain quality, skill, aptitude, nobility, bravery, excellence, and so on. In that way, a society or civilization is replenished with those various Breeds and Types of humans, which in turn causally allows the society or civilization to function as it does from generation to generation, century after century.

Regarding Hegemony

If you value such things as Leadership skills, of Exemplar conduct, of Excellence that should be emulated, then there is nothing wrong or evil about the concept of Hegemony:

One of the meanings of hegemony is “preponderance”:

Preponderance means stuff like: large number, vast distribution, all over the place, big quantity, so many that you out number others of your category, and so on.

I’m sure there are other Types/Breeds/Kinds/Strains of apples. But red apples dominates the apple-space. Red apples, when compared to other kinds/breeds of apples are more popular with humans. They thus have a hegemony in that apple-space. There are of course many factors that give them that hegemony/dominance/preponderance.

Phones did not always look like the phones we have today. In the very old days, phones were small clam shell flip phones, which didn’t have many capabilities or “apps.” What changed all that was the iPod created by Apple Inc.

The iPod of 2006ish-2007ish was big, slate shaped in form, had a big flat touch screen, has button-icons for apps you can download to invigorate your iPod with new functions and capabilities. That iPod design was quickly merged with phone capacity, and thus, the first iPhone came out in 2007.

At that time, the iPhone was so new in look and design, that many people and well established phone companies laughed at it. But the younger generations began to buy those iPhones and they/we abandoned the clam shell flip phones. This was when something special took place: the iPhone, and its design, achieved hegemony in the phone-space: it Thrived. The iPhone dominated that phone-space, set the standards, raised the bar, set the trend, dictated by power of influence what all future phones should look like.

Therefore, as a phone company competing in that phone-space, you had very few options: you either copy-catted that design, or you went bankrupt. Half the phone companies chose to continue manufacturing the clam shells, and the other half decided to make phones that look and function like the iPhone. Eventually, two phone companies would dominate the phone-space: Apple and Samsung.

That’s what Hegemony looks like in practice and in real life. It’s nothing wrong or evil or sinister or hateful. It’s simply success at thriving against competition in a given environment/space. Hegemony is simply being Better than others around you, inspiring other to do what you do, look like you look or go extinct. Those clam shell flip phones went extinct.

This is the Principle/Law of Genetic/Memetic Domination, Genetic/Memetic Drift, and Horizontal Gene Transfer [HGT]. That Principle [set of principles] are necessary for developmental evolution here on earth. That principle is Fractal and can be found anywhere in nature and in human civilization, including in human language.

Dinosaurs did not all go extinct. Some grew feathers, and eventually evolved the capacity to fly. Those that did fly, dominated dinosaur-space. That dominance – in number as well as in the power to out compete rivals – caused genetic drift, where minor mutations gradually occurred. And such genetic drift, as well as environmental adaptation/influence, caused to arise into being Birds. That’s the Principle of Hegemony in play in the real world. Those dinosaurs proved that they can thrive. Thus, they were able to set the trend or standard, to call the shots, to lead or spearheaded their trajectory of evolution to where their flying descendants ruled the skies. Mother Nature is cut-throat. In order for Mother Nature to survive for billion and billions of years, she requires organisms that can not only survive, but thrive. And “thrive” means to be better than others. To be the Most Excellent: The Master. To be the Exemplar. To set the standard for the future. To be the template of the future.

Silk originates in China. In ancient times the Chinese jealously guarded information about where silk came from and how to make it. The silk was used to eventually make a Style/Strain/Type of vestment call “Han Fu.” Han Fu, to this day, is exceptionally beautiful. The Han Fu eventually became a mark of status. The more privileged you were, the more servants you had, the less work you had to do: the longer and bigger your Han Fu sleeves. Emperors sometimes wore Han Fu which had sleeves that were so ridiculously long that they dragged along the floor several feet behind the emperor as he walked. And so, the Han Fu, in that time and space, achieved hegemony, and dominated cultural vestments.

International trade, and diplomacy, played the part of producing Genetic/Memetic Drift for the Han Fu. Statesmen and traders from Japan and India saw the people in China with status wear the Han Fu, and they wanted their own kind/style of Han Fu for their own people. And so, the Han Fu, in Japan mutated into this:

And in India, the Han Fu mutated into this:

And it is from India’s mutation of the Han Fu, that the girls and men of status of the Khmer Empire developed their/our Traditional Garments:

The Thai, Lao, Burmese, and Balinese later borrowed the Khmer’s mutation of India’s mutation of the Han Fu.

This principle of genetic/memetic hegemony also applies to styles/strains/types/breeds of Architecture:

The ancient Chinese temple and its distinct style of upwards curved roofing, eventually dominated Temple Architecture. That dominance, domination, set the standard, and that style/breed/type of roofing spread far, and can be found everywhere in the sinosphere, including Thailand:

Of course you have the ancient Greek style/strain/type/breed of temple/stately architecture:

Compared with the beautiful and majestic Neo-Classical Style/strain/breed of architecture of Washington D.C.:

The ancient Greek genetic/memetic strain of architecture versus the contemporary genetic/memetic strain of architecture of Neo-Classical should show you the immense Power of Hegemony: When you have successfully Thrived and you have achieved a level/state/status of total dominance/domination of your environment/space: the Laws of Nature gives you the Power to Set the Standard and to influence the future and future generations of human beings and human society/civilization, even for thousands and thousands of years. Even after you [the ancient Greeks] are gone. That is not only called a Legacy, but it is Aeonic Magick.

When the United States of America was newly born as a nation-state, the other states/kingdoms in Europe laughed at America and mocked it. America wasn’t cool like those Old World kingdoms. It had no king, no nobility, no ancient history, no respect earned. It was just a bunch of poor dumb rebels with some dumb piece of paper with philosophical rambling scribbled on it called a Constitution, and some guy called a mere “President.” And those dumb rebels had the silly notion of choosing their “President” to lead them, instead of having a King or Emperor made such by the will and decree of God and Pope. They mocked and laughed.

Eventually, all these people from Europe migrated to the laughable America, because it turns out: no human being desires to be oppressed by some king or some pope. And so, as America grew in size and population, it eventually Thrived as a nation-state. And that Thriving eventually caused it to become a Superpower, with huge amounts of coolness and social credit. Which meant that America had achieved hegemonic power and influence on the earth and over the entire human population of the world, directly and/or indirectly.

And the Laws of Nature Blesses the One with Hegemony by allowing it to call the shots and set the standards and be a template for the Future. And so, it came to be on earth, that most nation-states now copy-cat America where they have their own written constitutions, and they elect their own leaders. Now even the nations that once mocked and laughed at America – The United Kingdom and other European Kingdoms – also give their citizens civil liberty and elect their officers, even having Constitutional Monarchies. Nobody wants to be a king anymore, and everyone wants to be a President. That’s Hegemony, and the power of Hegemony: those other nations had better copy-cat America: or they go extinct. You fucking Emulate the Best, the Most Excellent: or you die, or you lose your fucking power, or you lose your fucking wealth, your fucking prestige, your fucking empire. Where is the British Empire now? The Spanish Empire? You Copy the fucking Master: The Best, The Most Excellent! Or you Die and go Extinct. There is nothing wrong or evil with Hegemony. It’s how evolution works in the real world. That which has Hegemony owns the Future, genetically and memetically.

We human beings, and a large percentage of animals on earth, are the living Legacy of a species of tiny mammals who achieved hegemony million and million of years ago in their environment/space. They were successful and thrived, their population/number grew, genetic mutations occurred in their population/species, which caused genetic drift, new species from their form arose gradually. It’s simply how Nature and Evolution works: The Best, The Most Excellent in quality and skill and intelligence: thrive, are blessed by Mother Nature with hegemonic power and influence, and forges the Future. We humans are the Legacy and living Testament of a species of tiny mammals who achieved genetic hegemony. Just like Greece and Rome still wield an influence upon our Western civilizations, even after thousands of years after their civilization fell: because in ancient history, those people/race and their respective social orders [society] achieved civilizational hegemony.

Human Society

There are different kinds/strains/types of human societies. A “society” to a human being is like a “forest” is to a tree. A tree by itself can survive and grow, make seeds and propagate itself. But it can easily die from various causes. If it should die, then that tree’s strain/breed gets wiped out or even goes extinct. In order for Mother Nature to ensure/insure that such breed or strain of tree has a greater chance of propagating their kind, she collects those trees together into a tight-knit social order, amalgamation, cluster, group, band, society, tribe of trees, called a forest. That forest becomes an ecosystem, where the whole system itself generates welfare and well-being for all of its parts and units: trees, other plants, animals, bugs, fungus, bacteria, everything.

Thus, in such an ecosystem: everything has a place and a niche function. Maggots eat dead meat. Fungus decomposed dead biomass. Trees make flowers, flowers make nectar, bees take the nectar then pollinate the flower and make the nectar into honey, trees make fruit, birds and monkeys have the niche function of eating those fruit and scattering the seeds of the trees around the place. And so, the trees symbiotically trade their nectar and fruit [their “labor” and “goods”] in exchange for the “services” of other organisms [in human terms, we call that an “economy”], and that symbiosis increases, to a greater exponential extent, the survival and thrivability of the trees. Predators and the adversarial conditions of the environment is the Resistance factor which keeps the population of members of that ecosystem in a natural state of populational equilibrium. And so, even viruses have a niche function in an ecosystem: they are a part of the Resistance factor. Resistance factor meaning that there are factors which resists your species from overpopulating a given ecosystem/environment/biome, which would cause an imbalance/disruption in the system.

In the human arena, our societies [forest of humans], come in all shapes and sizes and designs and models. The most primitive and ancient are the small band of familial clans/kin. You also have tribes. You have conglomeration of tribes. You have city-states. You have kingdoms. You have nation-states. You have empires. You have federations. You have matriarchies. You have theocracies. And so on. They all compete to be the Best, the Most Functional style/breed/type of society/civilization. Just like there exists competition in Nature and in the business world. Healthy competition breeds innovation, which drives evolution, and the gradually Betterment Towards Excellence.

And so, in ancient times, the population of the Chinese were small. The small groups of ancient Chinese people formed various designs/styles/strains/types of societies. The monarchal-imperial design eventually achieved a state of hegemony in the region of East Asia. And that hegemonic East Asian Chinese society/civilization functioned properly to where its members/citizens derived welfare and well-being, sufficient enough to cause those Chinese people to Thrive, and their population exploded into a billion human beings.

And so, very much like a forest or orchard: if your society works well, if it can produce for your people welfare and well-being, and if your society produces human beings of good quality: then you would obviously desire for the dominant race/people who created such a society/civilization to continue to dominate that society. Because ultimately: it is the Breed, Quality, Nature, Ethos, Mental Capacity, Cybernetic Capacity, Dharma of such a people to collectively and symbiotically produce such a style/type of society/civilization. It’s simple Math: if Y produces X and X is good in valuation/judgement, then you keep Y. If you replace Y, than the end result of the equation will not be X. And so regarding Chinese civilization: Y = the Han Race/Ethnicity who has hegemony in their society/civilization. If you replaced the Han with some other ethnicity such as the Uyghur, you will get a society/civilization which manifests a very different end result then one ruled and dominated by the Han.

The same with Western civilization and its nation-states. A society/civilization such as America was created by a certain Type/Breed/Strain of human beings, typically called White Europeans [primarily British and German in those olden days, let’s say “Germanic,” or White Anglo-Saxon Protestant]. And their civilization of America works very damn good! Good enough to not only become the only superpower on earth, but good enough to produce for its citizens welfare, security, and well-being. And their America even produces some very good Breeds of human beings: some of the most greatest scientists, inventors, religious thinkers, philosophers, statesmen, artists, musicians, military thinkers, and so on, were and are American.

And so therefore, if America was an Orchard of Fruit trees, and the type and quality of people this orchard produces is good, and the life and lifestyle its citizens have is good in quality, and its citizens have welfare and well-being, then we keep Y in order to continue to produce X. Y in this case = people of White European descent. In other words, in order to maintain how America functions and the Fruit America produces, the ethnic and racial descendants of the people who created America should be allowed to maintain Hegemony in America because: 1) Their ancestors created this nation-state & 2) They have obviously created a social order that works good: good enough for other races of human beings to want to live here and to Covet the welfare and well-being that America produces.

If we replace the variable Y [White Anglo-Saxon Protestants] with some other Breed or group of human, we will mathematically generate a different end result. And the type, quality, capacity of such other race or group of people directly affects the causal – cause and effect – outcome of the society they will make.

And we know that these other people don’t have the Nature and Capacity to make a functioning society. How do we know this? Simple: what nation-state in Africa functions properly where it gives its citizens proper welfare and well-being? None. Which is why millions of Africans are fleeing their countries. How many nation-states in Latin America give its citizens welfare, security, and well-being? None, which is why they are fleeing their countries and trying to get into America. And so if such races/people can’t make a society work properly in their own countries, on their own landmasses: what makes you think that if you give them America they will make it work properly? Do thistles make figs?

Most people – usually idealistic Leftists – don’t seem to notice or understand that the BLM Negros here in America out in those streets burning cities and streets down, using collective brute violence to force others to do things their way, using violence and burning shit down, and killing people to express their political and social dissatisfactions is the same fucking shit that Negros in African nation-states do! Why? Because it is simply in their Nature/Dharma as a Breed to behave in that anariya manner.

There was a term for such mode of behavior and violence in the old days: Tribal warfare. Because these Negros are by Nature and Breed a tribally conscious breed of humans. Meaning that their state of conscious development is tribal, which is a primitive form and species of human society [collective/cybernetic awareness/capacity].

They are an Anarya/Anariya Breed of humans. And such Breeds of humans have a different Vanna, a different nature, a different ethos, a different level of intelligence, a different temperament, a different quality than White Europeans or East Asians. These people are not of our Vanna. Not our Breed. Not our Kind. Not our Peers. Not our Equals. Actions speak louder than words, and the Fruit of our actions speak louder than the actions. These Anarya/Anariya people can go through the motion of having their own countries and nations all they want: but the nations they have created are not only Broken – are dysfunctional, Dalit – but their nations [their social order, how they order and behave as a collective organized entity/system] is a testament and Expression/Manifestation of what such Breed of Anarya/Anariya are capable of manifesting, their capacity: it’s not much, it’s primitive, it’s barbaric, it’s dysfunctional.

Chinese people in China have the obvious right to have hegemony/domination over their civilization, because its their country/civilization. In America, White Anglo-Saxon Protestants have the right to dominate [have hegemony] of this country/civilization. And in Africa, Negros can dominate that place all they want. And they do, and the countries they have – as a people and breed – manifested are stupid and shitty countries. If Y produces X and X = shitty dysfunctional tribal minded country, and you put Y in power of America, what will you have if not X? Thistles don’t make figs. You can’t expect African Humans to be capable of producing/manifesting/materializing anything beyond what African Humans are capable of producing according to their Nature, Ethos, Dharma, Mental Capacity, state of conscious development.

Tribal minded meaning how this Woke shit, is in essence and weltanschauung: tribal in nature. Their Critical Race Theory is tribal where it tribalizes Blacks into one group and Whites into an enemy group. That’s primitive in view and capacity of mind. That’s African shit. People and races in Europe and East Asia have developed consciously beyond tribal awareness. What do you think gangs are? Tribes. What essentially are gang wars? Tribal wars. And so it’s no surprise that the races that are into these street gangs are underling races.

Closing Remarks

A nation, civilization, organization, society, city, city-state, group, government, or any collection of humans, is only as good as the people who lead and influence it. There is no such thing as Equality in nature. And due to the fact that each race of human being have developed in different climate zones, and have physically and mentally adapted to different environments and environmental pressures, each race has differing Qualities, Aptitudes, Mental Capacity, Temperaments, Levels of Conscious Development, Level of Intelligence, Dharma.

And so therefore, just because Europeans can make for themselves countries that work good and proper, and just because East Asians can make for themselves countries that work good and proper, doesn’t mean that Black people and Brown people can create countries that work like our countries. This should be Obviously observable. You simply have to study all of the nation-states in sub-Sahara Africa, and all of the nation-states of Central America, and most countries in South America to see what kind of country such Black and Brown people have the capacity to manifest and if their countries work good and proper or not. If their countries worked good and proper: they wouldn’t be fleeing their countries in the millions, risking life and limb to come to Western countries.

By “working good and proper,” what is meant is that a properly functioning society of humans [nation, civilization, city] should generate the following things for each of their member-units [citizens, legal residents]: 1) Welfare, 2) Security, 3) Well-Being.

I don’t mean foodstamps and the welfare system by the word “welfare.” I’m using that word by its older meaning. By Welfare, I mean to say that a citizen of a civilization requires certain things in order to be content and happy, such as: creature comforts, personal liberty [so long as you harm none: do as you will], an income to buy food and items they need, a home of some kind to live in, family and friends, some leisure time to relax and do idle things. Welfare also means that if or when you need help, whatever the nature of the help may be: that there exists institutions and mechanisms which can offer you the help you need. If you are homeless: there is help for you. If you are hungry: there is help for you. If you are in need of spiritual comfort: there is help for you. If you are sick or diseased: there is help for you. If you are unemployed: there is help for you. If you are too old to work and can’t pay your bills: there is help for you.

The underlying concept and principle of Welfare is known as Metta in Theravada Buddhism, which means things like “loving kindness,” “compassion,” “brotherly love,” “the love and fellowship of friends,” where such compassion or love is directed always at alleviating the Dukkham [suffering, stress, distress, anguish, discomfort, worry, etc] of our fellows. In Traditional Christianity, Metta is known as Caritas. Essentially, Metta/Caritas simple means to be kind with and to give a shit about others.

By “Security,” I mean a number of things. Security meaning the Feeling of Being Safe From Harm & Danger. In primitive tribal times, security meant that you and your fellow tribesmen are safe from being killed by other tribes. In our modern nation-states, security means knowing and feeling safe that your government won’t hurt you or harm you so long as you are law abiding, that other fellow citizens won’t hurt or harm you, that you know and feel that you and your family members and children will not be hurt or harmed by the state, officials, other citizens.

Security means that your nation-state or civilization ensures/insures that your people exist in a place free of Himsa and free of the worry [Dukkham] of Himsa. In other words, that your country operates and functions according to the Civilizational Principle of Ahimsa and possesses the Condition of Metta/Caritas. Because of this principle, I do not personally like or agree with Capital Punishment.

When a country or civilization has the capacity to generate for its citizens/people Welfare and Security, then the Condition of Well-Being arises in your population. In reality, and Fundamentally, people from Africa, the Islamosphere, and Latin America aren’t fleeing to Western countries because of political unrest, social unrest, economic depression, poverty, and so on. All of those things are symptoms of Causes. And such things cause people to not have Welfare and Security, and a sense of Well-Being. And so Fundamentally, what such people come to Western countries for is Well-Being.

The Problem is that not every country works well and proper where such country generates for their people welfare, security, and well-being. Because a nation is only as good as the people who have created it, who run/rule it [dominate], and who influence it. And people are only as good as their Nature, Dharma, Vanna, Ethos, Aptitudes, and Capacities.

And so, therefore, in order for a nation that works good and proper to come into being, to exist, you need people of Noble quality, people who are by Nature and Dharma Honorable: Arya/Ariya. There is no such thing as equality in Nature, and so not every race and person possesses the same amount/capacity of Nobility/Honor. For example: a high capacity for Honor is like when a Captain of a ship goes down, drowns, with his sinking ship. Low capacity for Honor is when a ship is sinking, and the Captain uses the only raft to save himself and he lets the rest of the people on the ship to drown. There is a difference in Capacity of noble and honorable Nature/Ethos. And you can tell if a person is noble or honorable by the Fruit of their actions. Likewise you can tell if a race or ethnicity is noble or honorable by the Fruit of their collective actions.

Hence the caste system and how it is structured:

The upper three levels are occupied by people and ethnicities of noble and honorable Nature, Quality, Ethos, Dharma. The lower two levels are populated with the underlings, the undeveloped human beings, the feral, the wild, the tribal, the savage races. A civilization, nation, government, or organization is only as good as the people who have created it and who maintain it. There is Brahma the creator, and Vishnu the Maintainer. And when such things stop functioning properly: there is Shiva the destroyer.

Unfortunately, the various ideologies we have today, such as Egalitarianism, has turned that caste system upside-down, to where we now exist in a civilization which is actually backwards:

Not only is our current society upside-down, but it is also missing parts to it. Our Liberal/Leftist world has gotten rid of Traditional Religion: there are no more Sages, no more monks, no more nuns, no more philosophers. Our academics are retards who don’t think or learn but rather memorized pet theories and accepted ideology. Our scientists are fallacy prone atheists/materialists. And so we have no more “Brahmin” class in our society.

We also have gotten rid of Monarchism or the Power of the Monarch. And have replaced the Monarchy with groups of people and career political profiteers [career “politicians” who work politics to get rich/power] who are driven by emotive ideologies and influenced by lobby groups and special interest groups and personal profit. We have no more aristocrats of noble or honorable quality influencing our civilization as statesmen, diplomats, advisors, officials, or governors. We still have Warriors. But without Sages and Spiritual influence, and the guidance of noble and honorable aristocracy, our Warriors are mere mercenaries of governments who get paid to engage in meaningless emotive and/or ideological battles: the whole war in Afghanistan and Iraq thing was senseless, meaningless, emotionally driven engagements. And so we have no more Kshatrya class.

All we have are the Vaishyas [corporations, CEO, companies], the Sudras [underlings, commoners, mundanes], and the Dalits. Just a bunch of Corporations, undeveloped breeds of humans, and broken people, fighting each other to be king of the Hill. People and corporation that are ego-centered, who think only about their own gains and profits, as opposed to possessing a developed sense of Cybernetic Awareness.

Cybernetic Awareness simply means that you are consciously aware that you are a member-unit of a system Greater than yourself, and so therefore you have the Capacity to be Considerate [to consider the condition and needs] of other member-units, to possess the Dharma of Metta/Caritas, and to justify your actions by balancing your own needs with the needs of the System itself. Because the System, the Ecosystem, the Society, is the Orchard which produces the Fruit. And if that Orchard is to continue to produce good quality fruit – welfare, security, well-being – then it needs to function properly and optimally.

The other unfortunate thing about our current Western society is that the remaining three castes – corporations, common underlings, and broken people, are working to undo the status quo of White Hegemony.

In the East, East Asians have the natural right to possess and hold domination and hegemonic rule/influence over their civilization, because they made that civilization. The same with the West. A country like America was created into being by White Europeans. And so therefore, if America works good and proper, where it generates welfare, security, and well-being, to the point where living here is Coveted, then leave the Status Quo alone and let the White people continue to maintain rule/influence of their civilization: because they made it. If Y produces X and X = the way America worked good and proper; and you replace Y with some other race, then you obviously change the value of X.

The unfortunate and difficult thing for the White population of America is that in time, if they do not fix their immigration policies: they will grow to become the minority race; and Black and Brown people will be the New Majority. Which in turn means that Y has been replaced/displaced. Which then means that X will have a different value. What will the value of X be? Well, you simply have to have a look at the nations such Blacks and Browns have created around the world [Africa, and Latin America]. The Fruit never falls far from the tree, as the old people say in my culture. Or as Jesus said: Figs don’t grow from thistles.

I am, by dharma and disposition, a Traditionalist. The word “Traditionalism” has ethnic context obviously. Different ethnicities have different Traditions, obviously. But there are some universal concept to Traditionalism: I believe that Traditional Religion is very important and has a place in civilization. Traditional Religion in the West meaning things like the Catholic Church, Anglicanism, Mormonism, etc.

Another universal element of Traditionalism is that I believe that Traditional Culture, Ethnic Culture, Folk Culture, is very important. Culture is literally what made us human, as it played a huge part in our process of evolution into the creatures that we are. Both Traditional Religion and Traditional Culture together behave like Glue, which coagulates, binds, unites, people into a functioning social order. When you remove those two variables from the equation: you have the gradual deterioration of Civilization and of Racial Coherence. How so?

Because of what the Buddha said: Everything that physically exists in this physical universe are composite Aggregate entities. And therefore, what is made of aggregated parts, will in time dis-aggregate, what is made of Parts will in time fall Apart. What is Structured will in time be De-Structed.

And so, a society, a social order, a civilization, is an organized aggregation of humans. What binds or unifies such humans into an aggregated entity are Traditional Religion and Traditional Culture. When you remove those two factors, your civilization begins to decay: enters its stage of decadence. The last factor that holds a civilization together is the Status Quo of the hegemonic race/ethnicity who created and influenced the civilization: when they lose their dominance, their dominating influence, and when you no longer have Traditional Religion and Traditional Culture: you have societal collapse.

The reality [re: realism] is that races and civilizations collapse and vanish. We hate to admit it or think about it. What ever happened to the ancient Egyptian Race and Civilization? They are gone, vanished. How about the Mayans who built those great Mayan pyramids? They are also gone. Whatever happened to the Khmer Empire that built that Angkor Complex? It’s gone too. Why? Because if you remove or replace the ruling hegemonic race and you get rid of Traditional Religion and Traditional Culture you have societal collapse. And the aftermath of societal collapse is the Deterioration of Racial Coherence.

In ancient times, the Khmer Empire was ruled by a race of people who came from Northern India, called the Kamboja-Aryans. That was the hegemonic race of that civilization. Naturally, their Traditional Religion and Traditional Culture was Brahmanism, not Buddhism. The collapse of the Khmer Empire began when Buddhism was imported and displaced Brahmanism, and when other races from the nearby areas came to the empire and began mixing with the Kamboja-Aryans. And so, when that empire/civilization collapsed, you then have the disintegration of that Race: today, 90% of the Khmer are mixed with Chinese. There is no such thing as a pure bred Khmer on earth. The ancient Kamboja-Aryans who once lived in that place, have been bred into genocidal extinction. They only exist in trace amounts within the genes of the upper classes of the Khmer and Thai.

And without those Kamboja-Aryans you will never have anything created by such people, like cool empires. Likewise with East Asians: without East Asians existing you will never have things such race can produce and manifest. Likewise with White Europeans: without White Europeans you will never have things that such race of people can create, produce, manifest: no high science, no space exploration, no civilization that works good and proper. Which in turn causally – cause and effect – means that Humanity as a species, will not develop further. Because what we humans are capable of achieving, is entirely founded upon our Nature, Ethos, Dharma, Aptitudes, and Capacities. Therefore, if Humanity is to ever evolve towards higher states of betterment/advancement: the appropriate civilization is required. Because just as biological/animal evolution takes place in the matrix of an ecosystem, so also does the gradual development/evolution of our human species take place within the matrix of Civilization. And the suchness and capacity of a Civilization is entirely based on the Nature and Quality of the people/race who founds/creates such Civilization.

So whatever happened to the ancient Egyptian Race? They don’t exist anymore. We unfortunately exist in a Causal universe. Causal meaning Cause and Effect, This makes That, X + Y = Z. If you fuck around with any of those parameters/variables: you fuck the whole equation up and fuck up the end results.

The Left, since the end of World War 2 have been working relentlessly to dismantle and destroy Traditional Religion, Traditional Culture, and Traditional Families here in America, for their own profit of wealth and power. They’ve been very successful. And now they are working to disrupt the Status Quo of White Hegemony. If they succeed: America, as a functioning civilization, will Collapse.

/Chloe

 

 


Zero Sum Games

Posted: May 25th, 2021 | Author: | Filed under: Acausal Theory, Alchemy, Anarcho-Nihilism, Anarchy, Civil War, Current Affair, David Myatt, Drecc, Dreccian, Fake News, Far-Right, Heretical Texts, Journalism, Junk Journalism, Labyrinthos Mythologicus, Leftists, Liberals, Media Attention, Monarchism, Mundanes, National Socialism, neo-marxism, News, Nihilism, O9A, O9A Nine Angles, Occultism, Order of Nine Angles, Order of the Nine Angles, racial equity, Reichsfolk, Satanic Heresy, Satanic Polemics, Sinister Japes, The Sinister Dialectic, The Sinister Game, The Sinister Tradition, The Sinisterly Numinous Tradition | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Zero Sum Games

 

.:.I like to play a dice game called “Cee-Lo.” The dice game originated in China where it is called Si Wu Liu, which means Four [si], Five [wu], Six [liu]. Si Wu Liu became Anglicized as Cee Lo. You play with three dice, and when you get a 4-5-6 you automatically win. Getting a 1-2-3 is an automatic loss. The Chinese immigrants long ago brought that gambling game to New York, where it eventually became adopted by street folks and spread as a gambling game of street dice known as Cee-Lo.

Cee-Lo can be played with as many players as you wish. At the beginning of each session, bets are placed into the “pot.” Bets are matched. Meaning, if the First Roller puts in $20 as his bet, everyone puts in $20. All that bet money constitutes “the pot.” Winner takes the whole pot. Losers lose everything. Such a game where winner takes all and loser takes none is called a “Zero Sum Game.”

Poker is also, obviously, a zero sum game. So is trading things like stocks and forex [currency exchange]. If you win some money in a trade, that means that someone has lost money. And if you lose money in stocks, that means some rich guy or some company won your money. That’s zero sum.

What else are zero sum systems? Wealth is. Wealth here meaning the possession of material resources that contributes to your welfare and well-being. And so, when an Alpha Male monkey or ape owns resources in the form of females, social support from beta males, foodstuff, and territory: that is the Alpha Male’s Wealth. Thus, it’s a zero sum system: because the Alpha Male controls/possesses that wealth and the others do not have that wealth.

Therefore what is the end outcome of such a zero sum system where the Alpha Male has wealth and the other monkeys do not? Well, we’ve defined what Wealth is already: it’s the possession of material resources that contributes to your welfare and well-being. And so therefore, the end result of such a zero sum system is that those monkeys that do not have the wealth are “poor,” they lack a means of welfare and well-being and will suffer, unless they are allies of the Alpha Male.

What else is a zero sum system? Power is.

The Alpha Male monkey monopolizes Power, which means that the other monkeys do not have power. Therefore, whatever the Alpha Male says, goes. The Alpha Male is the shot caller, the boss, the leader. The others are under his control and influence.

Thus, in such a zero sum system, there is no such thing as sharing, or equality, or equity. Equality and Equity – especially as such terms are used by the Left and Critical Race Theory – simply does not exist empirically in Nature. Therefore: Wealth & Power are not things that are shared or distributed equally/equitably. Not even in our human world.

You might protest, but here’s a simple way to understand the zero sum quality of Wealth & Power: who makes the rules/laws and who goes to prison for not following such laws? You? No. Do you have a job/work/career? If yes: you aren’t wealthy. Are you a pensioner or retired and getting money from government/corporation? If yes: you aren’t wealthy. Are you privileged? If no: you aren’t wealthy. Will your children be the next generation of the Ruling Class? If no: you don’t have Power.

The Game

In a zero sum game, losers lose everything. South Africa is a prime example of the game you White People are being forced to play here in America by the Left Neo-Marxists and their mob of Woke Blacks and Browns.

There was a time when White people won the game in South Africa and controlled/possessed the Wealth & Power. And then that Nelson guy came into the scene where his life and plight evoked and provoked emotions in the massive Black population. Which fomented and energized movements and political parties. Then what happened? Then Democracy happened.

Democracy meaning that because Blacks in South Africa were the actual ethnic majority, they gained political power. And then what happened? Then the Blacks began their equality/equity thing of taking property and farm land from Whites and re-distributing that shit to their own kind. Winner takes all. Then what happened? Well, those White people who stayed in South Africa became a minority race, who do not have wealth or power. They became marginalized, hated, despised, and resented. They end up being killed and raped.

And then what happened to South Africa? Black people simply don’t have the natural cybernetic capacity to run a nation or government properly to where citizens obtain well-being. And so South Africa went to shit.

It’s the same emerging pattern here in America. You White people here in America are repeating South Africa’s history. Because history realistically is the collective actions and behavior of human beings, and all human being do the same set of things, and react to the same stimuli in the same manner. Thus the repeat. The main difference is that instead of a Nelson guy as the Emotive Mob Mascot, you have the Floyd guy as the Emotive Mob Mascot used by the Left to evoke and provoke Blacks and Browns into religious hysteria.

The Game doesn’t seem or feel bad right now to you White People. But give it 25 years, when your race/people will be a minority here in America. This is a democracy. Which means the Majority Wins. And Winner takes all.

If you White People here in America don’t manifest some kind of collective folk/racial identity/understanding, like those fucking Negros in 25 years, you will Lose the game: and Losers lose everything in a zero sum game. This is something the Left is very afraid of: It’s why the Leftist Neo-Marxists have made “White Supremacy” an enemy, and why they have been attacking National Socialism & the Far-Right. National Socialism, in its various forms, is one of few things which has the power to manifest in White people a strong Propinquitous collective Ethnic/Racial/Folk Identity/Awareness. Divide & Conquer is the Principle at play: they Unify into organized mobs, and they work to keep White people divided and disorganized; work to keep Whites from materializing a collective racial/ethnocultural identity/awareness.

You simply, by Natural Law/Principle, cannot have both Equality and Diversity at the same time. Shit may be Diverse in Nature, but Nature is highly stratified Dharmically, where everything exists in its own hierarchal niche and has a niche function which contributes to the whole ecosystem. When you force a system which is composed of Diverse Parts where each Part is forced to become Equal, you have a system which cannot function. It’s like expecting the various parts of a tree – roots, leaves, flowers, etc – to be equal where they do the same thing and so on.

When you have a country which is ethnically/culturally diverse and you force such diversity to be Equal, you not only have a system which no longer works, but you now have ethnic rivalry and competition. For what? For Wealth & Power. And Wealth & Power are zero sum entities.

You White people aren’t playing this Game right. You have 25 years to figure the Game out. Or you Lose everything.

/Chloe

 


On Rulership & Elites

Posted: May 24th, 2021 | Author: | Filed under: Current Affair, Guest Essays, Monarchism, O9A, O9A Nine Angles, Order of Nine Angles, Order of the Nine Angles, The Sinister Tradition, The Sinisterly Numinous Tradition | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on On Rulership & Elites

[ Originally posted at: On Rulership & Elites | Yorkshire Rounwytha (wordpress.com)  &  On Rulership & Elites – Dark Anchorite (wordpress.com)]

 

“History is a graveyard of aristocracies.” -Vilfredo Pareto

In order to actually create a new social order, an analysis of current society and its power structures is in order.

Mosca observed that all societies are ruled by a numerical minority. From the ancient priesthood of Mexico, to the “right honourable gentlemen” who haunt the corridors of Westminster, they have always been a feature of society. He named this minority the political class. This means that every society could be split between two social classes: the one who rules and the one which is ruled.

According to the modern democratic narrative, there is no longer any ruler class- there exists simply the People and the individuals these People elect to make changes for them (though to regard these elected individuals as “rulers” outright tends to chafe a little against the democratic narrative).

These elected individuals, however, share a lot more in common with the aristocratic rulers of old than they do with ordinary, elected rulers. Firstly, the children of these elected rulers often go on to become rulers themselves. This model is normally referred to as hereditary rulership.

Another feature is that nobody from outside this loose knit circle of rulers and heir apparents may enter into the game of rulership. One or two “populists” may occasionally succeed, but their careers are often short-lived or marred by controversy and relentless attacks from the organ of the “free press”. This is why systemic change via entry into democratic politics is largely ineffective. The system has been in place for far longer than any one person and has built up for itself an impressive immune system with which to repel outsiders.

If you doubt there is a structure of hereditary rulership suffused throughout Western democracy, take a few moments to peruse the list of political families in the UK and the US on Wikipedia. The scale of this phenomenon is quite eye-opening (these ruling families are also known to intermarry at a high rate). Of course, there is nothing conspiratorial about this observation. It’s all there for anyone to see.

In fact, until 1999, the UK House of Lords operated on a system of hereditary peerage. Many of these “political families” conveniently descend from the previous actual ruler class viz. the landed gentry (awkwardly, notice how few of them are Jewish! That bursts that theory). These gentry are in turn often descended from the Norman nobility who invaded England in 1066. Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose.

In reality then, a ruler class, functioning along primarily hereditary lines or organisation of wealth and connections (which can be regarded as a sort of familial network) still thoroughly remains in place today, albeit in a rather more sophisticated and obfuscated way. After all, the democratic narrative would not tolerate open hereditary rule. When the Founding Fathers wrote “no title of nobility shall be granted by the United States“, all they did was ensure ruling dynasties would be able to operate without the use of formal titles.

The general remedy for the entrenchment of the elite class has historically been revolution; this however serves only to introduce more chaos into the system, providing thus further niches within power through which new constellations of elites may enter into the game and the whole system starts over- the fact that revolution means the turning of a wheel isn’t accidental.

Understanding Elite Theory

In Machiavelli’s handbook for rulers, The Prince, he delineates two types of rulers- the Lion and the Fox.

He argues that a prince, in order to be an effective ruler, must from time to time use the nature of both men and beasts wisely to ensure the stability of his regime. He ccompares the use of force and strength to the lion, and the use of guile and deception to the fox, and advises the prince to study them both.

Vilfredo Pareto, an Italian economist and sociologist whose main works centre around the study of wealth and power distribution in society and who formulated the Pareto efficiency (that 80% of the wealth is amassed by 20% of the population), introduced a social taxonomy that included six classes, Class I through Class VI. Class I corresponds to the adventurous “foxes” in Machiavelli, and Class II to the conservative “lions,” particularly in the governing elite. Perhaps we can layer these two terms over our modern political dichotomy of Conservative and Liberal.

The most effective form of government will ideally contain an equal mixture of both; lion-men (Conservatives), capable of decisive and forceful action; and fox-men (Liberals), who are imaginative, innovative, and unscrupulous. Note however that this is the ideal model of government whilst under the rule of a princeps. Without a wise and beneficent leader to reign in these disparate wings in- the sort of ruler of which the writings in The Prince are aimed at- the whole system begins to decay. Such regimes invariably either degenerate into ossified and rigid bureaucracies, or into weak regimes of bickering lawmongers and rhetoricians incapable of decisive and forceful action. Sound familiar?

Pareto’s ideas are quite apposite to our study here as he essentially pioneered Elite Theory. (Interestingly, regarding his work on economics, the inverse of a Pareto efficiency holds true and can be applied to many other areas and to most economic observations- economics being, at its most basic level the science of human interactions. Why this is so remains one of the strange quirks that permeate our universe and which we endeavour to understand via the study of Aeonics). Pareto also argued that democracy was an illusion and that a ruling class always emerged and enriched itself. Very perceptive fellow.

Pareto also taught that the majority of social action is driven by non-logical and non-rational motives, but that we strive to give, through our personal actions a “spurious logicality” to them.
Much of human history is an oscillation between conservatism and risk-taking behaviours within the ruling elite- observing a decline from lion mentality to that of the fox, as per Machiavelli. This invariably leads to social disaster, which results in the dial being set back to the rule of lions and a dominance of conservatism. This model bears similarity to Spengler’s own view of society prior to its entering into it’s Imperial civilizational phase, ruled over by Caesars. It is also at this turning point in a society that we find ourselves on the cusp of, incidentally.

So, we are beginning to see that this unique character of modern governments is nothing more than a thickly applied ideological gloss- in the same way that previous governments adorned masked their elite rulership with a gloss of “divine mandate” or a “will of the Proletariat/Volk”.

Rule With An Iron Claw

Perhaps then what needs to be done now is not to enact some movement opposed to the System and favouring armed insurrection as its weapon of choice. There will be plenty of outliers and extremists to try this method to death, but these movements rely on, among other things, a level of popular support. Its also not conducive to one’s mental health to live in a constant state of revolutionary paranoia. We are elitists; we know that we are not like others, that we strive to possess traits and qualities of which the average person simply has no comprehension. We cultivate these traits, pride ourselves on our master-morality and make no apologies for it. What we need to do now is start acting like the Dark Nobility which we are or which we indeed strive to become.

We believe in rule by those with the ability to lead and of “proper blood”. Hereditary monarchy provides as suitable a method as any, and in this way a prospective ruler can be prepared their entire life for the responsibilities of rulership, usually under the mentorship of one already qualified in doing so. Modern democratic propaganda likes to ascribe a flavour of tyranny to the idea of monarchy (no surprise, given monarchical rulership is the prime rival of the democratic option). However, a monarchy has no need for such top-down centralised economies and blunt methods of control. Dictators need to be in absolute control- their very raison d’etre is predicated on it. However they are in control thanks to the application of force not law. And thus all it takes for someone else to assume the mantle is to remove the current dictator- and thus there are always people trying to assassinate the Dictator.

Not so the Monarch. Eliminate him and you won’t get a coup backed by other opportunists who will help you seize power. Instead you’ll get a royal guard who will summarily dispatch you into small pieces and immediately put the next in line to the throne in charge. There is no need to manage the economy in the same way controlling dictators do either. The freer the markets, the freer the people- once the proper authority has been put in place and everyone is aware of it.