Nick Lowles Is Angry Again

Posted: April 19th, 2021 | Author: | Filed under: Anarcho-Nihilism, Anarchy, Current Affair, David Myatt, Deofel Quartet, Fake News, Far-Right, Journalism, Junk Journalism, Labyrinthos Mythologicus, Leftists, Liberals, Media Attention, News, Nihilism, O9A, O9A Nine Angles, Occultism, Order of Nine Angles, Order of the Nine Angles, Satanic Heresy, The Sinister Dialectic, The Sinister Tradition | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Nick Lowles Is Angry Again

[ reposted from: https://wyrdsister.wordpress.com/2021/04/19/nick-lowles-is-angry-again/ ]

After the British government today – 19 April 2021 ev – announced it would ban the neo-nazi group AtomWaffen Division (AWD) as a “terrorist organization” Nick Lowles of Hate Not Hope infamy – and recipient of the “Little Darling Of Magians Everywhere 2021” award – was spotted angrily hopping around his home-office clutching two mobile telephones and calling BBC News, various Labour Members of Parliament, The Independent and The Guardian newspapers, and any newspaper or Media organization who would take his calls.

The source of his anger? In his own words: that “the government has missed an opportunity to take action against the dangerous Order of Nine Angles (O9A), a nazi-occultist group which has been a key influence on the AWD and several other nazi-terror groups.”

He ranted that: “Since we started to warn about O9A’s growing influence, a serving US soldier has been indicted for planning a terror attack with O9A members, and the Canadian government has moved against the group, too. Time is ticking: the Government must take the threat of O9A more seriously and urgently get a ban in place….. Over the last 24 months, eight nazis linked to the O9A (members or in possession of O9A material) have been convicted of terror offences in the UK….. In July 2020, the US Attorney for Southern New York indicted a serving US soldier for attempted murder. It is alleged that he conspired with O9A.”

Let us rationally analyse his anti-fascist rant, as I am sure MI5 have done.

§ “eight nazis linked to the O9A, members or in possession of O9A material…”

i) What that is probative – what evidence admissible in a Court of Law – has he, or any anti-fascist or politician or journalist, that any of those neo-nazis were members of the O9A?

Did they say or write that they were members? If so, when and where? Where is the paper or the electronic trail, the actual evidence that they said or wrote such a thing. Show us the paper or the electronic trail, the actual evidence. Until you do, it’s just propaganda, fake news.

Also, does just saying or writing that you are a member of some group make you an actual member? No, of course it does not.

ii) Is mere possession of O9A material a crime? Not yet. So what material is Little Darling Of Magians Everywhere 2021 referring to? We would love to know.

Until he deigns or some other crusading anti-fascists deign to tell us, we ask him et al: does any material written by Anton Long between 1976-2012 promote or incite terrorism or racial hatred? Do, for instance, The Black Book of Satan, or Naos, or Hostia, or the Deofel Quintet, or the Satanic Letters of Stephen Brown? Not so far as we know, but if Lowles or any of his anti-O9A crusaders know better then perhaps they can enlighten us and MI5.

Does any material written by any of the seven or so students of Anton Long promote or incite terrorism or racial hatred? Material such as The Hermetic O9A, or The Seofonfeald Paeth? Not so far as we know, but if Lowles or any of his anti-O9A crusaders know better then perhaps they can enlighten us and MI5.

§ “indicted a serving US soldier for attempted murder. It is alleged that he conspired with O9A.”

Alleged is the operative term here. What O9A did he conspire with? The esoteric, the Occult, philosophy of Anton Long? An O9A practice such as The Seven Fold Way?

Since the O9A is a changing, evolving, sub-culture, a genré, a genus, a “sinister tradition”, it does not have any organizational structure, no leader or leaders, no hierarchy, and cannot have “members”, only (i) individuals following, or trying to follow, the path to Adeptship as outlined in the hermetic Seven Fold Way, {1} and only individuals who are part of an autonomous nexion some of which nexions follow their own interpretation of O9A philosophy, just as Jehovah’s Witnesses follow their own interpretation of the Old and the New Testaments.

So, did the serving soldier conspire with someone – such as an FBI agent – pretending to be O9A via social media? Or did he conspire with some autonomous nexion and if so what nexion and person or persons in that autonomous nexion?

Until we have names, dates – a paper or electronic trail, probative details – it remains a mere allegation, mere propaganda, fake news. Just like everything else Lowles and his anti-O9A crusaders have said and written about the O9A.

TWS Nexion
April 2021 ev

{1} Anton Long, letter to Kimberly dated 25th September 1992 eh, and included in facsimile in volume II of The Satanic Letters of Stephen Brown.

^^^


Interview With Jake Hanrahan And ABG Lodge

Posted: April 17th, 2021 | Author: | Filed under: David Myatt, Drecc, Dreccian, Far-Right, Islam, Journalism, Labyrinthos Mythologicus, Leftists, Liberals, Media Attention, Mundanes, National Socialism, O9A, O9A Nine Angles, Occultism, Order of Nine Angles, Order of the Nine Angles, Reports, Satanic Heresy, Satanic Polemics, Sinister Japes, The Sinister Dialectic, The Sinister Game, The Star Game | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Interview With Jake Hanrahan And ABG Lodge

.:.Jake Hanrahan interviews one of the Founders of ABG Lodge about the Order of Nine Angles. I understand that Jake Hanrahan and ABG Lodge will be doing a series of podcast episodes regarding various ONA matters and stuff. The first episode:

I have no opinions about the content of this specific podcast episode. Never trust any person that forms an opinion about things in a matter of seconds or minutes, because such opinions are not intelligent or articulate: such opinions are emotive and born from whimsical emotions and feelings. And we know that emotions are by nature: irrational. It takes time to intelligently formulate an opinion about a given topic, matter, or issue; because one needs to collect data, information, intelligence, figure out the context of things, figure out the underlining motive of all parties involved, figure out who the intended audience is, and so on.

I do believe the ABG Associate answered questions asked of him well and honestly. Such answers may not always be the kind of answers a Questioner may always desire to hear.

Although I don’t personally have any opinions about the content of the interview, I have a small friendly suggestion for Jake Hanrahan:

There is nothing wrong with questioning ONA, nothing wrong with asking an ONA person questions about whatever topic or subject matter. There is also nothing wrong with having negative feelings and opinions about ONA.

But answers to a line of questions become pointless if and when the line of questioning is itself pointless and incoherent.

And so my little friendly suggestion for Jake is that you need to give your body of questions, your line of questioning, some kind of structure and format. Doing a freestyle and formless episode like this may be fun and easy, but it makes things hard for your listener/audience to Follow [per non-sequitur].

For example, there first must exist a desired outcome or an over-all idea that you wish to get across to your audience. You then break down that over-all idea into steps:

Over-all idea = ONA

Therefore: Who, What, When, Where, Why, & How. Thus:

Who: Who founded the ONA? Who is Anton Long? Who is Anton Long said to be? Is David Myatt Anton Long? Who is David Myatt?

What: What is ONA? What makes ONA different [or the same or whatever] from the Church of Satan, the Mormon Church, or whatever… What makes the ONA, the ONA?

When: When did the ONA come into existence?

Where: Where did the ONA come into existence?

Why: Why does the ONA exist? What is its raison d’etre? Why did Anton Long create the ONA?

How: How [in what way] does the ONA exist? How does a person become ONA? How might a person practice ONA?

And then each of those steps can be further, fractally, broken down into the Core Questions:

Who: Who is “Anton Long?” We know that “Anton Long” is a pen-name. To whom does that pen-name belong? Could it belong to David Matt as some journalists and academics say?

What: What evidence, or lack thereof, exists to show or prove that “Anton Long” is whoever people say he is. Is he David Myatt? How do we know that? Is he a professor at some university? How do we know that?

When: When did this “Anton Long” create the ONA? And what exactly do we mean by “create” and “ONA.”

Where: Where does this person using the pen-name “Anton Long” live? Can we obtain such information by the language and vocabulary and spelling that the said person uses?

Why: Why did this person behind the pen-name “Anton Long” create the ONA? What is his motive? What does he desire to accomplish? Does he just simply desire to be a cult leader of his own Satanic thing like Anton LaVey? Did he create ONA as a honey-trap to covert occult oriented people into Neo-Nazis? And for what purpose?

And you can have a different subtopic where you [Jake] would say: “So let’s talk a little about some things that ONA teaches or does… like worship the Devil or be racist nazis.”

You would then use the Core Questions to formulate a body of questions for your person you are asking pertaining to that subtopic. You articulate a coherent line of questioning, in order to derive or obtain an articulate body of answers. Because a properly articulated body of questions and answers produces something that is easy for the listener to also articulate in our/their minds. This is called “Effective Communication,” meaning that you desire, as a Communicator, to Communicate, Convey, a certain idea or concept – biased or unbiashed, objective or unobjective – to a given audience, such that your audience not only understands you but also sympathizes or even agrees with your ideas or concept you are trying to convey: hence the word “Effective.”

Formatting or structuring your line of questions is not for the person you are interviewing, it’s for the sake of your listener, it’s more effective at communicating an idea or concept, and it makes your content sound and feel more professional.

A secret to Effective Communication is that we [the person trying to communicate shit to others] must expend – in ratio – more energy and time into articulating and explaining our thoughts to our audience/listerner/reader, than the energy [brain energy taxes the body’s oxygen and food supply] our audience/listener/reader will put in to process the information we give to them.

And so, in an interview, such as a podcast like this one: Both you and the person being interviewed, must work together in order to expend more energy in articulating and explaining, so that your audience expends less energy to consume the information you are trying to give/convey to them. And a body of questions in a formatted or structured form is how you dance with the person you are interviewing, to work with them.

This is just simply how all biological organisms function on this earth: any organism, if it had to choose between a food resource that is easy to Digest and a food resource that requires a lot of energy to Digest: would choose the easy to Digest food. Fractally: if you are mining for bitcoins, and all of your computers use up more energy in Value than the value of the bitcoins you have mined: then… your bitcoins aren’t worth much, relatively speaking. Now… if you gave away those bitcoins you have mined to people for free: that is Effective Communication. Why? Because those people you gave those bitcoins to did not have to spend much energy mining those bitcoins, and so the ratio of Energy : Gain = Good/Beneficial. Less energy and more Gain = good/beneficial for all and any living organism.

Why does the ONA have an easy time growing and spreading? Because of this same Fractal Biological Principle of the Ratio of Energy:Gain. Anton Long expended 40-50 years in explaining ONA shit in 5000 pages of stuff. Therefore: as a person studying ONA who may be drawn to its Mythos, the energy:gain ratio is beneficial [you don’t have to put in 40 years, Anton Long is giving what he learned to you]. And, biologically speaking, what is beneficial means that not only will you be able to survive but also to Thrive. And so, the secret in Effective Communication is to take the Responsibility to help or cause your audience to Thrive.

It’s a simple Law of Nature that all biological organisms – including us human beings – and superorganisms and systems [such as an ecosystem] function on. Why do Fruit Trees propagate so well? Because Fruit Trees put in an enormous amount of time and energy producing sweet fruits for birds and animals to eat. Therefore the energy:gain ratio for those birds and animals regarding the fruits is “beneficial” meaning: Less Energy in exchange for More calories, sugars, food resource [the birds and animals eat the fruit, and spread its seeds via their poop]. One’s views, morals, opinions, ideas, inventions, religion, ideology function on the same fractal principle of energy:gain ratio. If the ratio = Beneficial, the said things will propagate easily.

And so, a secret to building an audience, for developing influence, for having Effective Communication skills is to simply take the full Responsibility in properly articulating, explaining, and conveying to people your ideas or opinions, so that those people easily understand what exactly you desire for them to understand without them using up their own energy to do so. What you are doing is giving them Free Knowledge without them having to expend their own energy to acquire that knowledge. Just like the bitcoin example, just like how an ecosystem propagates itself. It’s how genes and memes propagate. Less Energy : More Gain = Beneficial; Beneficial = Thrive. That is the formula for spreading ideas and opinions. By that same formula, all kingdoms and empires, all religions, all corporations, and political parties spread and gain adherents/markets. By that same formula, Hitler gained power over Germany: he helped Germany, which was fucked up after WW1, to Thrive. If an idea, ideology, political view/model helps a person or people Thrive, then it will spread, by Law of Nature: all organisms, superorganism [such as nation-states, political parties, ant colonies], and ecosystems, desire to Thrive.

/Chloe

 

 


Weeding Out Extremism

Posted: April 10th, 2021 | Author: | Filed under: Anarcho-Nihilism, Anarchy, Civil War, Current Affair, Far-Right, Journalism, Leftists, Liberals, National Socialism, News, Nihilism, O9A, O9A Nine Angles, Order of Nine Angles, Order of the Nine Angles, Reports | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Weeding Out Extremism

.:.The US Military is Trying – functioning word is “trying” – to weed out extremism from its ranks. But unlike “some” lawmaker or “some” Department, the US military is doing things the right way: by first trying to define what exactly “extremism” means.

You can’t logically and rationally just throw the word “extremist” around at random people or groups you don’t like. It’s not a medieval Witch Hunt. Just like you cannot simply throw the word “terrorist” around at random people and organizations. According to Legal Thought, terms and words must be properly defined, before such words may be used to accuse, convict, and condemn suspects.

Rhetoric, no matter how passionate and divisive, is just that: Rhetoric, which is protected by the Constitution. Would Fanatic Evangelicals, who use passionate and divisive rhetoric be considered and defined as “extremist?” And if so, would a military person who is a member of such a fanatic evangelical church be punishable? Would a Fanatic Muslim be punishable for being a Radical Islamists: is there a difference? Is a fanatic Muslim a “terrorist” or “extremist?” And would a fanatic Muslim be kicked out of the military for having extreme religious views and feelings?

At least the military [Pentagon] are intelligent about their attempt at weeding out extremism from their ranks: they understand, because of the Oath they took to defend the US Constitution, that they must be careful so as to not violate people’s Constitutional Right to speak and think as well as to assemble and form groups and associations. Unlike “some” lawmaker.

Does an American Citizen have the right to speak and think as they please? Even if such speech and thoughts are unconventional and fanatical, even radical? And do people of similar strong speech and thoughts have the right to assemble and form groups and organizations?

Are those entities listed in that list above actually “terrorist” “organizations?” Or collections of people who have assembled with like minds, who use strong speech and have strong views?

What in the world is Generation Identity and the Order of Nine Angles doing in that list?

The Left is beginning to worry me. Little by little, they take your freedom away. It’s an age old game and technique: Ordo Ab Chao. Order out of chaos. They manufacture the “chaos.” By Fear Mongering the public, until the public is worked up and afraid for their safety. And then they present themselves as the Saviours by passing “necessary” laws to keep the public safe from their manufactured boogiemen and chaos. And in that way, very slowly and imperceptibly, the Left erodes people’s Freedom away.

Rhetoric is now slowly becoming a crime and even a “terrorist” offense. I’m amazed that the Left has not yet deemed the Republican Party to be a “terrorist” organization. There will come a time soon when a White person talking good things about White people will be a criminal offense.

That “White Lives Matter” protest and movement should be interesting [assuming they can make it happen]. I’m waiting to see how butthurt the Left will get. Pay attention to the rhetoric of the Left after that White Lives Matter rally. Those White people will be called things like extremists, and possibly even “terrorists,” and a “threat to America.”

Whereas when massive groups of Black Lives Matter and Antifa run around the streets burning sections of whole cities, burning down police stations: those aren’t “extremists,” or “terrorists.” Certainly not racists, or racialists. They are unhappy Black people and disgruntled Leftists, expressing their anger and dissatisfaction.

Based on what I have seen from the Far Right, I have not thus far seen the Far Right produce the amount of arson, looting, attacks on police stations, and neighborhood businesses, and general mayhem, that the Left has produced.

/Chloe

 

 


White House Pushed To Outlaw ONA

Posted: April 9th, 2021 | Author: | Filed under: Anarcho-Nihilism, Anarchy, Civil War, Current Affair, David Myatt, Far-Right, Journalism, Leftists, Liberals, Media Attention, Michael Aquino, National Socialism, News, Nihilism, O9A, O9A Nine Angles, Occultism, Order of Nine Angles, Order of the Nine Angles, Temple of Set | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on White House Pushed To Outlaw ONA

 

.:.There should be a comma in that list placed after “Order of Nine Angles” and before the word “And.” I’m reminded of a movie I watched long ago about the war between Japan and Russia. At one point, one of the two warring parties is losing the battle. The general of the losing side calls a meeting of shot callers in his army and nation, and the general says to his people: “Gentlemen… there is a time to breath in, and a time to breath out.” Like the Tide ebbs and flows: the Left’s power is Flowing. The Left is pushing the current US Administration/Regime to outlaw the Order of Nine Angles as a “Foreign Terrorist Organization.” The time for the ONA to “breath out” and retreat may be coming.

What is unprecedented is the Left outlawing a philosophy, a Satanic “cult” like the ONA/O9A, which 1) Is not an organization & 2) Is not Neo-Nazi.

But I’m not going to complain about any of this. I honestly think it’s really cool and nice for governments to take ONA seriously. Because for years, since the 70s when Michael Aquino of the Temple of Set was alive, nobody took ONA seriously and nobody even believed the ONA was even real. For the longest time, up until his death, Aquino insisted that David Myatt was the only member of the Order of Nine Angles. And since 2007, every Satanist online, in those forums didn’t even believe the ONA was real or existed.

The Order of Nine Angles is today taken seriously enough to be viewed as a dangerous threat, real enough to warrant being banned and outlawed as a “terrorist,” organization. I will say though that these days, the word “terrorist” is being used in a very liberal way. It seems that anything a political regime doesn’t like these days can be labeled as “terrorists.” Just like in the old days, they threw around the words “Socialist” and “Communist” around at anybody they didn’t like.

I would like to doubt that America will not be as silly as the UK, to ban a philosophy and religious movement such as the Order of Nine Angles. I would like to hope and believe that the US Constitution protects our right to have our own minds, views, thoughts, opinions, beliefs, religion, philosophy, and to speak and express such things, even if such things is not liked or acceptable to Leftist Agendas.

If, my Americanism is wrong, and the Left do end up outlawing the ONA, then ONA will need to go underground, become a genuine Clandestine movement, and recruit the old fashion way: person to person… phone to phone… and ONA will need to utilize Darknet. Anton Long once said that in the future, the outer name “ONA / Order of Nine Angles” may be discarded by some future generation for whatever reason. What he was saying is that the exoteric name/label is unimportant. What is important is the Essence beneath the form/label. I have a nagging suspicion in my solar plexus that soon, the Order of Nine Angle’s will need to discard its exoteric name. It would actually be cooler for ONA to be a nameless Phantom Menace. A nameless global underground Sinister and Occult movement. We can always refer to it as the “Sinister Tradition,” which is another term ONA has been using since its birth.

The Leftist Agenda we are witnessing in this era is a dangerous one for the White Population in general. Where the Left are getting bold enough to outlaw and ban White People from being proud of their own Race and Culture. I’m not White, so I can see this from an outside and objective manner.

In one generation, White People here in America will be a minority Race. The Christianity of White People is dying. The traditional family structure of the White People have been broken down into divorced households, single parent homes, and even broken down into segregated individuals. Divide & Conquer. The Culture of White People is dying. Culture and Traditional Religion is the Glue which bonds and holds a Race together. Without that Glue, a Race or Ethnicity begins to dissipate and defuse.

If you are White, I seriously would suggest that you pay very close attention to how the Chinese Regime is working to destroy Tibetan Civilization, Tibetan Culture, and Tibetan Religion. Because the same strategy and techniques the Regime of China is using against the Tibetan People, is being used by the Left against White People.

Being Proud of your own White Race, and struggling to keep alive your own White Traditions and White Culture is not a crime: it is only a crime to the Left and their Liberal Agendas. Just as it is looking more likely that people can be incriminated for associating with an Occult Philosophy [ONA], in time, if this Agenda continues, it will be a crime for White People to be White. You will not have to go out of your way to commit any crime: the crime will come to you, because the Left will legislate and enact their laws and agendas.

A Civil War in this country is looking more likely in 30-40 years. If the Left will make their laws to outlaw ONA, it will be time for ONA associates to disperse like mushroom spores or viruses, and to implant ourselves inside factions, groups, parties, organizations which will help bring about this Civil War. What is important is that Adversity – the very meaning of Satan is Adversity/Enemy – is the underlying Essence and Force of Evolution itself. And so Adversity is not a bad thing. The Adversity ONA is experiencing is a Satanic Blessing: ONA either Adapts to that Adversity and thus evolves, or it Dies.

The Left do have their Agendas. But there is an unintended consequence to their Agendas of undermining White Culture and White political dominance/hegemony to give such power to ethnic races. Such ethnic races – primarily Blacks and Latinos – do not have the human nature and ethos to run and operate a nation or civilization, hence why they are fleeing and have fled their native nations [which are failed states] and have come here to the West. The unintended consequence of the Left’s Agenda is that America and Europe will become another South Africa, and White People here in America and many parts of Europe will be like Whites in South Africa. History Repeats itself. History is the collective fruit of our collective human actions.

And those Mundanes in Power do not consider Human Nature & Ethos. Races such as Blacks and Latinos and Middle Easterners simply do not have the Nature & Ethos to give birth to and produce a functioning, healthy Nation-State or Civilization. And so, the Left’s ignorance of human nature and ethos, will cause history to repeat. A weak White Race means Strong/Empowered ethnic races: they come to fill in the void and vacuum. The greater context is that China is growing in power on the earth. If the Left have their way, there will be many unintended consequences to their stupid and silly actions: the downfall of the White Race and the downfall of America and its power of influence in the world and on humanity.

Like dominos, when you see the Left outlaw things like ONA and White oriented organizations, you will know the pieces have fallen, and a domino affect will take place: it will be the beginning of the end. And only a Civil War will stop it.

/Chloe


Modern Journalism And The Left

Posted: April 5th, 2021 | Author: | Filed under: Current Affair, Far-Right, Journalism, Junk Journalism, Leftists, Liberals, Media Attention, Mundanes, News, O9A, O9A Nine Angles, Order of Nine Angles, Order of the Nine Angles, Reports | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Modern Journalism And The Left

 

.:.I agree with Communist Regimes and the German Nazi Regime: Journalists are scum and should simply be executed.

I’m beyond “fascism” when it comes to my personal and private beliefs and opinions of so-called “Journalists.” I’m Khmer. Our old-world social order is based on Brahmanism, meaning that our old-world culture and society is a Feudal society which was/is divided into castes [varna in Sanskrit, Vanna in Pali]. Traditionally, based on our Traditional Feudal views, a Peasant [those of the bottom caste/class] have no legal or social right to be literate. It was illegal, back in the Kingdom for those people to go to school and learn to read and write. I am by upbringing a Feudalist.

There was a reason why such social rules were established. Same reasoning why, relatively “recently” African Slaves in this country were forbidden to learn to read and write. The reasoning is that humans who are ignorant by nature and ethos cause more problems when they can read and write: because they are Stupid by default, and due to a lack of organic high order intelligence, and a lack of reading and articulatory comprehension skills, they will misunderstand what they read. Which is one reason why conspiracy theories are so prevalent amongst the common public.

But those peasants wanted to learn how to read and write. And so they eventually got together and gave birth to the Khmer Rouge: peasant Communists. They fought and killed for their right to read and write. And then what happened? And then, once in Power, they Understood why people shouldn’t be literate. And so, what did the Khmer Rouge do? They murdered every fucking person who were able to read and write, and murdered teachers and educators.

There are two lessons to be learned from the Khmer Rouge: Lesson 1 = We all understand things in the proper time and place. As peasants they did not understand why it was not lawful for them to learn to read and write. When they themselves became a regime, they Understood why. Lesson 2 = Like the old people in my culture say: “You will stumble upon that which you hate.” The peasants hated those of us in the top varna/vanna so much for oppressing them and keeping them illiterate, that they themselves eventually became the Oppressors and they themselves murdered people en masse to keep them illiterate.

The State of Journalism & The Left

I learned about journalism first in Middle School, and then once again in High School. But this was long ago, when journalism was actual journalism: when it was an honorable profession of writers and reporters.

We learned in Middle School that a journalist “reports” stories to people. They write a “story” by answering the Core Questions of: Who, What, Where, When, Why, & How. Data must be collected from people and so on, in order to answer those Core Questions. The Data must be Objective and Unbiased. And so, our teacher gave us assignments where we were ordered to write an article about an event that took place in our neighborhood or in our family.

Interestingly, I failed that assignment, because I was very young and dumb at that time, and so, I did not know what exactly being “Objective,” and “Unbiased” meant. The subject I decided to write a news article about was on a few kids who lived on my block [they were friends of mine] who did drugs. My “journalist” article defended their right to do drugs, and I attacked the DARE program as being incompetent. I ended up being sent to the principle’s office.

And so, I learned back then, that when a journalist interjects their own private views and opinions, that it is not a “news article” proper, because it’s not Objective [as opposed to subjective views and opinions] and Unbiased. An article which is subjective and biased, which incorporates the emotions and views/opinions of the journalist was called an “Editorial” back in those days.

Today, in journalism, there is no difference between a news article, an editorial, a tabloid, and fake news. In the old days, what we today call “fake news” was referred to as “Misinformation.” And back during the era of WW2, “Misinformation” was referred to as “Propaganda.”

The word “Propaganda” – which shares the same root lexeme as the word “Propagate” – is a means or method of Propagating a certain view, sentiment, belief, or opinion, in a given target group. And so, when modern Journalists write their fake news, such fake news are not objective and unbiased stories about current events: they are narratives written to Propagate their own views, sentiments, beliefs, or narratives designed to spread manufactured opinions and sentiments in order to influence readers [i.e.: citizens].

Today, journalism has gone far beyond being shitty fake news manufacturing machines. Their “news articles,” and “reports,” have gone beyond editorials.

Today, journalism has self-promoted itself into tribunals. And every journalist today is a Judge and Prosecutor.

A good example of the current state of Journalism as Prosecuting Tribunals, is the 1990s interview recording involving David Myatt & Nick Lowles. I’ve had about a week to listen to that interview and formulate an opinion.

In the said interview, David Myatt is clearly on the Defense. In that interview, Nick Lowles is not acting or behaving like a Journalist. He [Nick Lowles] is playing the role of a Prosecutor, one who already had a Pre-Meditated, Pre-Fabricated notion/story/theory that David Myatt is behind the ONA, and that because David Myatt is behind the ONA, he [David Myatt] is therefore an evil and awful person. And like a Prosecutor – one who is functioning outside the legal jurisdiction of any known court mind you – Nick Lowles does not ask David Myatt objective and unbiased questions. Instead Nick Lowles tries to actually Prove his case during the entire duration of the so-called “interview.”

I find a few things disgusting and despicable about that so-called “interview”: 1) That Nick Lowles, playing the role of a Prosecutor, acted in the capacity of such outside of a court, and outside of any known and legal judiciary jurisdiction, 2) That Nick Lowles had the audacity to try and Prove his case, without any actual evidence, by asking David Myatt weasel questions and playing amateurish lawyer games, 3) That David Myatt did not have a Lawyer or Attorney by his side, to help Defend him and his side of the story.

Something about the United Kingdom, its government regime stooges, its journalist institutions, and Nick Lowles, disturb me. Here’s what is disturbing to me:

  1. You have Nick Lowles and UK “journalists” for the past few years relentlessly attack the ONA, with these stupid internet gossip they pass as journalist articles. None of which are researched properly, none of which are objective and unbiased.
  2. Every one of those Anti-ONA journalist “articles” fear mongers the public.
  3. At the Hope Not Hate website there is more fear mongering, where that entire website is dedicated to emotively stimulating the Readers into a fearful frenzy.
  4. After the Readers of the said website are sufficiently afraid for their lives, a Button is provided to the fearful Readers to push in order to urge the UK Members of Parliament to ban the ONA.

So the questions those of us who are intelligent should ask are: 1) Did Nick Lowles and those journalists do any research to verify their story/narrative? 2) Do you actually think that the Readers, will do any research to validate the stories and fear mongering they read? And 3) Do you actually think that those members of parliament will do any research to validate and verify why their constituents [the fearful people] are afraid and if the stories they have been reading are valid and factual, and real? The answer to all three of those questions is: NO. That’s why the UK disturbs me: they’ve made a political method out of fear mongering the stupid public in order to make laws that increasingly divest people of their liberties. Mind you, this is the same government regime that bans and outlaws groups for being Right Wing, which are labeled as “terrorists.” Yesteryear the Leftist hate-words were “Communist” and “Socialist.” This era, the hate-words of the Left are “terrorist” and “child molesters.” Which is one reason why, as a Feudalist, I believe that commoners should not be literate, because they simply cause more problems when they read shit.

I’ve noticed that those journalists use a lot of logical fallacies when attacking the ONA. One main fallacy they have been using – they use this fallacy with anything they dislike – is called “Card Stacking.”

Card Stacking, for example is when you have a normal deck of poker cards. In that deck there are red suits and black suits. And so “Card Stacking” is when you show people only the black cards, to make it seem as if there are only black cards.

In real life, Card Stacking is when as racists, we desire to make people believe that African Americans are bad people, and so we say: “Look at all the millions and millions of Black people in prison, blah, blah, they do drugs and gang bang, blah, blah.” That’s Card Stacking. It’s Card Stacking because: what about all the White people in prison? And the Mexicans? And what about all of the millions and millions of descent Black people that are not in prison?

Those journalists Card Stack ONA, by telling internet gossip. What about the 5000 pages of institutional texts written by ONA founder Anton Long? What about all the ONA text that says that ONA is not neo-nazi? And so on?

I understand, because I’m not ignorant, that there was a time when Journalism could afford to be objective and unbiased. This was back in the “hey days” of Journalism. Back when paper-based news papers where still around. Journalism today is going through a crisis.


[making money now from trash liberal/Leftist journalism]

 

It’s the same crisis Radio went through when TV was invented. It’s the same crisis TV and Cable went through when the internet was invented. It’s the same crisis that Playboy Magazine died from.

Playboy Inc, peaked during the mid-2000s, when it even had its own reality show on TV. But when the internet began to be used by everyone, you could just google for free porn. Playboy magazine didn’t know how to work around this crisis and stay relevant to Generation Y & Z. They died and went bankrupt.

Journalism is going through the same crisis: paper-based news papers is dead. You can get news for free on the internet. For the past decade – I’ve been observing for a decade – journalism has been working to transition into an internet based [digital] institution. It’s been a clumsy ordeal for them. Besides working to become digital, Journalism is working very hard to grow a new audience, since Baby-Boomers who read paper-based news papers their entire life, are phasing out [dying of old age].

Therefore, today, in the endeavor to build and create their new audience, all Western Journalist institutions which are carry-overs from paper-based news paper companies, are Leftist Institutions, because the Left is a lucrative market.

Which is why, modern Journalism, tend to have a heavy focus on sensational issues and stories that excite the Left. Such as: people beating up ethnic minorities, cops beating black people, gay hate crimes, State laws that threaten the rights of transexuals, loads and loads of reports about the Right and Far Right, making neo-nazis into the boogieman, etc. You simply follow the fucking money trail. Modern Journalism slangs shitty researched trashy Liberal narratives to their Leftist audience for money. I have absolutely no fucking sympathy or respect for you fucking modern journalists.

There was this one time, long ago, when Journalist news had this thing called “World News,” which was when they would report about current events from around the world. These days, when I watch American news [I’m American] all I see is shit like cops beating up black people, how some tranny kid is crying because he can’t use the girls’ restroom, gay pride parades, how Mexicans are suffering at the border, what Donald Trump ate for breakfast and what he tweeted that day, and facebook shit.

You Become What You Hate

Journalism is today a kangaroo court of courtless Prosecutors and Judges, and the Left is their audience and Jury. The Left and their journalist emotion puppeteers don’t realize it, but they hate “fascists” so much that they have themselves become the “fascists.” Any group or organization that does not agree with their Leftist/Liberal doctrines and ideology gets put through the gauntlet where dozens of fellow journalist Tribunals circulate fear mongering shit about you all day long for years, until the lemming Leftist public act up and push their MPs and Senators to pass laws to save them. It’s called the “Rule of the Mob.” The Mob doesn’t think, it feels emotions. Hence why today Journalism appeals to the emotions of the Left. Hence: fear mongering. Hence: fake news. It’s a flaw in democracy I greatly dislike: when the Demos rules, journalists can influence and control the demos. Thus, those journalists become King Makers in such Mob ruled democracies.

Those of us on the Right, don’t want to oppress anyone’s freedom. Most people on the Far Right are simple traditionalists who are proud of their folk culture and race, and racial history. Most people on the Right are just Christian who see and know that their Christianity is a dying religion in the West, and they’re just trying to speak and struggle to keep it alive. The unfortunate thing about Orthodoxy is that Old Things that can’t adapt to the change of Time and Clime, and environment, become irrelevant and die out.

Today, Journalists and the Left have become the oppressors and fascists. Anything and anyone that contradicts their Leftist and Liberal views and agendas becomes their enemy. Under their Leftist influence, the Freedom to Think and Speak your mind is fast becoming legally uncertain. It’s no longer socially acceptable to think and speak anything [to have opinions] that contradicts the Leftist mob and the Journalist Judges.

I hate Liberals so much, that I have, in a way, become Liberal myself. I believe that every human being, regardless of race, gender, age, nationality, has the natural right to be the human being they desire to be. And if that means that they desire to be Satanists, or Nazis, or Drug addicts, or Trump supporters, or misogynists, or racists, or rapists, or murderers, or homeless, or business owners, stay-at-home mom, cop, politician, or whatever: then that is their human and natural right. So long as we each understand that every action and inaction we commit or withhold generates causal consequences in this causal world: then we are each Free by Nature to be as we each desire to be.

I believe in Fate and Destiny and Dharma: that in this earthly Life, we each, by Fate/Wyrd, become the person we are meant to be. And what consequences in Life we each reap, because of the person we are, are also by acts of Fate and Providence. I don’t believe we have any power over Divine Providence. It would be arrogant to believe so. And so, it’s none of my business or concern really, if Providence has fatefully made a Man a racist hater of Blacks and Asians and Women; or whatever. And so, I see no need to force my personal views and beliefs – political or religious or otherwise – on others. God made us each how we are in life for a reason and purpose. I put my Trust In God, not in man-made ideologies, Left or Right.

/Chloe